In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss the recent county court case, Merlin Real Estate Ltd v Balaam. The case is in relation to easements, particularly the intensification of use. Richard provides an in-depth analysis of the case's background and evaluates the case law on the construction of express grants of rights of way and its limitations.

Cases mentioned:

Merlin Real Estate Ltd v Balaam [2024]

White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne [1913]

Alvis v Harrison (1990)

Jelbert v Davis [1968]

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss the recent Court of Appeal case, R (on the application of Strack (on behalf of The Woodcock Hill Village Green Committee)) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. The case is in relation to the deregistration of village greens and particularly offering replacement land. Richard provides an in-depth analysis of the case's background, and both the High Court and Court of Appeal judgments, evaluating its significance as a case for the deregistration of village greens. 

#DavittJonesBould #VillageGreens #Development

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this episode, our host Lizzie is joined by Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training, and Matthew Needham-Laing, Construction Partner, to discuss the highly topical Building Safety Act. Richard and Matthew analyse leaseholder protections and the criteria for high-risk buildings as well as the implications for owners and developers. Additionally, they provide insight into other concerns relating to the Act and the impact on the construction industry. 

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss the recent High Court case, Tropical Zoo v London Borough of Hounslow. The case is in relation to forfeiture and particularly the waiver of forfeiture through acceptance of the breach. Richard provides an in-depth analysis of the case's background and evaluates its significance. 

#realestate #forfeiture #davittjonesbould

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Davitt Jones Bould's Head of Legal Training, to discuss Blackhorse Investments (Borough) Limited v The London Borough of Southwark. Richard analyses discharging restrictive covenants preventing development including leasehold land. This case holds relevance for stakeholders involved in developments of any size. Richard assesses the background to the case, reminding us of the importance of s84 of the LPA 1925. He further explains the reasoning behind the decision, giving context for future cases. 

Cases mentioned: 

Kay & Cunningham (2023) 

Re Cammiade (application under section 84 of the Law Property Act 1925) (2023)  

Re Hickman & Sons Ltd’s Application (1951) 

Re Barclays Bank plc’s Application (1990) 

Blyth Corporation's Application (1962) 

Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd (1997) 

Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster (1991) 

#RealEstate #Covenants #RestrictiveCovenants #DavittJonesBould

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss the recent High Court case, McDonald’s Restaurants v Shirayama Shokusan. The case is in relation to the rarely discussed topic of a landlord obtaining possession through misrepresentation. Richard provides an in-depth analysis of the case's background and evaluates the potential implications arising from one of the few decisions on section 37A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.

Cases mentioned:

McDonald’s Restaurants v Shirayama Shokusan [2024]

Eco3 Capital Ltd & Ors v Ludsin Overseas Ltd (2013)

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould, to discuss the High Court case Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Mellcraft. Richard provides a refresher of the background law including ground (g) of the LTA 1954 and delves into the facts of the case. Additionally, Richard offers a detailed analysis of the court's decision, focusing on crucial issues such as the application of the Act to mixed-use premises and the implications of ground (g) regarding occupation for your own purposes.

Cases mentioned:

The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Mellcraft Ltd [2024]

Greyson v P&O Holdings (1997)

R (Annington Properties Limited) v Secretary of State for Defence [2023]

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Davitt Jones Bould's Head of Legal Training, to discuss Sainsbury’s Supermarkets v Medley Assets. Richard analyses the background of the case and the importance of ground (f) of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1945. Although this is a county court case, it addresses a crucial legal issue concerning the interpretation of ‘the holding’ in the context of opposed lease renewals. Richard also offers valuable insights for tenants facing ground (f) opposition, explaining the court’s reasoning and its implications for future cases.

Cases mentioned:

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets v Medley Assets [2024]

Betty's Cafe v Phillips Furnishing Stores (1959)

S. Franses Ltd v Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd [2018]

Atkinson v Bettison [1955] 

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Head of Legal Training at Davitt Jones Bould to discuss the enforceability of positive covenants. Richard analyses the challenges posed by the enforceability of positive covenants in freehold land, exploring the associated issues. He also sheds light on potential solutions, including the role of deeds of covenant and commonhold.

Cases mentioned: 

Austerberry v Corporation of Oldham (1885) 

Rhone v Stephens [1994]

Roberts v Lawton [2016]

Halsall v Brizell [1957]  

Wilkinson v Kerdene [2013]

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Davitt Jones Bould's Head of Legal Training, and Property Litigation Partner Jonathan Warner-Reed to discuss Mackenzie v Cheung and Infinity. Jonathan provides insights into the recent Court of Appeal case where he represented the successful respondent. 

Richard and Jonathan analyse the interpretation of property covenants, and grants of modification. This case holds relevance for stakeholders involved in developments of any size. They assess the background to the case, reminding us of the importance of planning permission when it comes to restrictive covenants. Additionally, Richard and Jonathan elaborate on the reasoning behind the decision, addressing the impact on conveyancers.

Cases mentioned:

Mackenzie vs Cheung & Infinity [2024]

Mayner v Payne [1914]

Eagling v Gardner [1970]

Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking. 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

Get in touch!