La seconda parte approfondisce la dimensione territoriale del colonialismo d’insediamento in Cisgiordania, dove il controllo lascia la scala urbana per trasformarsi in un progetto capillare di riorganizzazione dello spazio. L’episodio ricostruisce le radici storiche del progetto sionista, la nascita degli insediamenti dopo il 1967 e l’evoluzione della colonizzazione attraverso kibbutz, città suburbane, comunità collinari e outpost illegali poi legalizzati. Le voci degli intervistati guidano l’ascoltatore dentro le logiche di pianificazione che istituzionalizzano l’esproprio: la trasformazione delle terre in “state land”, la costruzione sulle alture come strumento ottico di controllo, l’architettura panottica degli outpost e l’emergere di università nei territori occupati come infrastrutture permanenti della colonizzazione. L’episodio affronta anche il tema della temporalità sospesa dei campi profughi e del ruolo dell’arte e della memoria nel contrastare la cronopolitica dell’occupazione.

Fonte inserti audio:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxLDYkX7l9A

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10156573118623487

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkXJwErm8DM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrdldVhfbaU

La prima parte di “Manuale minimo di urbanistica coloniale (come si pianifica un’occupazione)” esplora come la pianificazione urbana diventi un potente strumento di dominio nei territori occupati. L’episodio racconta come mappe, piani regolatori, vincoli e burocrazia siano impiegati da Israele per controllare Gerusalemme Est e ostacolare la possibilità, per la popolazione palestinese, di costruire, espandersi, accedere ai servizi e abitare la città in modo stabile. Dalla giudaizzazione del territorio all’“abusivismopianificato”, la puntata mostra come il potere si inscriva nello spazio: attraverso demolizioni selettive, permessi mai concessi, quartieri compressi e infrastrutture pensate per connettere colonie e isolare comunità palestinesi.Gerusalemme diventa così il laboratorio più evidente del colonialismo d’insediamento, dove urbanistica, legge e politica si intrecciano nel ridisegnare la città e la vita di chi la abita.

This episode brings together Jeremy Gilbert and Christian Schmid to explore how digital capitalism and Lefebvrian theory can shed light on the changing nature of urban space. Jeremy Gilbert opens the conversation with his work on Platform Capitalism, examining how digital platforms, such as Uber, Airbnb, and Amazon, colonise everyday life andrestructure the material and social fabric of cities. He highlights the ways in which platform power operates across scales, from the household to planetar logistics, transforming labour relations, deepening spatial inequalities, and embedding surveillance and algorithmic governance into urban life. In this account, the city no longer functions as an autonomous entity but as a node within vast digital networks, reshaped by the logics of data extraction and platform accumulation.

Christian Schmid then situates these developments within the intellectual legacy of Henri Lefebvre. Revisiting Lefebvre’s notion of the urban revolution, Schmid reflects on the concept of Planetary Urbanisation: a new stage of urbanisation, distinct from the industrial age, that is the product of the digital era. He considers how digital infrastructures and physical spaces are increasingly entangled, producing hybrid spatialities that destabilise bounded definitions of the city.This entanglement, he suggests, redefines public space, accessibility, and inclusivity while also revealing ontological shifts in the city’s essence and functionality. Schmid emphasises that urban planning, historically shaped bytransformations in production, now faces the challenge of responding to Platform Capitalism: either through adaptation or through a radical rethinking of its foundations.

Together, Gilbert and Schmid provide complementary perspectives on the contemporary urban condition. Their insights span questions of power, inequality, and planning, and point towards a critical horizon: can urban planning resist Platform Capitalism’s centralisation of power and imagine more democratic futures, or must the discipline itself betransformed to meet the conditions of digital urbanisation?

Can a law reshape a city? Salva Milano was introduced to unlock construction across Milan, but quickly became a symbol of something deeper: how urban planning isbeing redefined by private interests, legal loopholes, and political urgency. This episode unpacks what happens when development accelerates at the cost of transparency, equity, and long-term vision. Between satire, protest, andsuspended construction sites, we follow the ripple effects of a city built for speed—and ask: Who is this regeneration really for?

What happens when housing stops being treated as a right and becomes a residual category—something to manage, not invest in? In this episode, we return to one of Milan’s largest public housing districts to examine the material and institutional neglect shaping daily life. Through interviews with researchers and residents, we uncover the long retreat of public responsibility, the internal fractures within social housing, and the everyday forms of resistance and care that emerge in response.

Gated condos next to crumbling apartments. Luxury towers rising beside public neglect. In this first episode, we explore how Milan’s urban space has become a landscape of stark contrasts, where inequality is no longer hidden but spatialized, embedded in the city’s architecture. By tracing narratives, policies, and lived experiences, we ask: What kind of logic is driving the city’s transformation? And what does it mean when the same street hosts two versions of the urban future?

In this final episode of the Territorial Elsewheres series, we travel to the Valle di Lei, a borderland between Italy and Switzerland where a monumental dam reveals the tensions between local governance, energy interests and spatial appropriation. Through the voices of Michela Fanetti, Dino Buzzetti, Omar Iacomella, Dominique Durot and Martin Cantieni, we retrace the history and transformations of a valley — formally Italian, yet accessible only from Switzerland — that has become a crossroads of ecological, economic, and institutional transitions.

Audio excerpts are taken from the documentary Un metro lungo cinque by Ermanno Olmi and the video Radio 24 – Erste Sendung November 1979 vom Pizzo Groppera.

.This episode explores mountain territories as places of production, leisure, and spectacle. Considering practices of mass tourism and mega events as major drivers of spatial transformation, the episode critically explores their sustainability—not only environmentally, but also spatially, socially, and economically. Drawing insights from the work of Martin Müller and Sarah Gainsforth, the episode addresses the material and immaterial effects of such leisure practices in mountain territories through a threefold perspective: firstly, in spatial and tangible terms; secondly, in terms of governance; and thirdly, in terms of the intangible human experience. By reflecting on the above, the episode seeks to highlight the fact that mountains are increasingly undergoing processes of urbanisation, especially in the context of tourism and mega events. Ultimately, it constitutes a call for defending, protecting, and preserving our mountain landscapes.

The first episode of this new Urbinary cycle investigates how systems of labour exploitation shape space, focusing on rural southern Italy. It explores the phenomenon of Caporalato—the informal recruitment of agricultural workers—not merely as an illegal labour practice, but as a spatial and political infrastructure sustaining global food systems.

The episode navigates themes of informality, temporariness, and exclusion, tracing how settlements like La Pista emerge from the intersections of migration, state absence, and economic extraction. These spaces, often viewed as peripheral or non-urban, challenge conventional urban categories and highlight the centrality of so-called margins within contemporary capitalism.

By reinterpreting the rural as an active site of production and power, the episode raises critical questions: what defines a city, and what kinds of spaces are produced at its edges?

In this 4th episode of Urbinary, we venture beyond the traditional confines of academia to explore research, education, and publication practices situated ‘in the periphery of’ academia. We question which aspects of the ‘status quo’ can be pushed back against and how.

To unpack this, we chatted with three different editorial platforms that we admire for their thoughtful and generative perspectives: The Funambulist, KoozArch, and Bellingcat.

Join Aubrey Toldi, Isabella Traeger, and Mohamed Elgohary as they explore different positionalities within spatial knowledge production.