A case in which the Court determined that warrantless blood tests incident to an arrest for drunk driving violate the Fourth Amendment, but warrantless breath tests incident to an arrest for drunk driving do not.

A case in which the Court determined that the use of an uncounseled conviction in tribal court proceedings that complied with the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 (ICRA) as a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. 117(a) did not violate the Sixth Amendment.

A case in which the Court held that the implied certification test could be a valid basis for False Claims Act liability, and the conditions of payment with which the defendant allegedly failed to comply did not need to be explicitly stated.

A case in which the equally divided Court affirmed the lower court's judgment that the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program was arbitrary and capricious, and failed to undergo notice-and-comment procedures as required by the Administrative Procedure Act.

A case in which the Court held that the rule the Supreme Court announced in Johnson v. United States regarding what constitutes a violent offense for the purposes of sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act applies retroactively.

A case in which the Court determined that the Army Corps of Engineers’ jurisdictional determination that a property constituted “water of the United States” was a final agency action subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.

A case in which the Court held that, regardless of whether special counsel appointed by the Attorney General to collect debts are “state officers” under the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act, the use of Attorney General letterhead by such special counsel is not materially misleading.

A case in which the Court determined that the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s requirement to exhaust administrative remedies does not have a “special circumstances” exception.

A case in which the Court determined that a defendant may be a “prevailing party” for the purpose of the award of fees even without a ruling on the merits.

A case in which the Court determined that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a speedy trial does not extend past a guilty verdict or guilty plea.