A case in which the Court held that the omission of eyewitness testimony in a murder trial, which was the only evidence linking the accused to the crime, was a violation of the accused's due process.

A case in which the Court held that a dispute over passport regulation was not a political issue and is thus liable for judicial review.

A case in which the Court held that filing a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Section 7206 qualifies as an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act if the Government's revenue loss exceeds $10,000.

A case in which the Court held that the Due Process Clause does not require a preliminary inquiry into the reliability of an eyewitness' identification unless the ID was brought about under unnecessarily suggestive circumstances.

A case in which the Court held that a prisoner who does not seek review in a state’s highest court faces final judgment for the purposes of Section 2244(d)(1)(A) upon “expiration of the time for seeking such review.”

A case in which the Court held that a witness in a grand jury proceeding is entitled to the same absolute immunity from a §1983 action as a witness who testifies at trial.

A case in which the Court held that a prisoner cannot assert an Eighth Amendment claim for damages against private prison employees.

A case in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires defense attorneys to communicate formal plea offers from the prosecution.

A case in which the Court found that the test to determine ineffective assistance of counsel, from Strickland v. Washington, was not properly applied in an aggravated assault case.

A case in which the Court held that the policy used to determine whether a resident alien is able to ask for relief from deportation under a repealed portion of immigration laws is “arbitrary and capricious” under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).