A case in which the Court held that a plaintiff in a class action case cannot stipulate that the potential damages are less than $5 million in order to remove the case from federal jurisdiction.

A case in which the Court held that it was improper to apply the categorical approach in which the courts apply elements of a prior conviction with elements of a generic crime in order to enhance a sentence under the ACCA.

A case in which the Court decided that the return of a child to his or her country of residence pursuant to The Hague Convention, does not make an appeal of that order moot.

A case in which the Court held that the statute of limitations for filing a claim with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board may be extended up to 3 years.

A case in which the Court found that transferring polluted water from one portion of a waterway to another portion of the same waterway did not constitute pollution under the Clean Water Act.

A case in which the Court found that based on the Clean Water Act, a permit is not necessary for storm water runoff because it is not associated with industrial activity.

A case in which the Court held that a collective action suit on behalf of other "similarly situated" employees becomes moot when the individual claim does.

A case in which the Court held that the determination of “plain error” is made during the appellate review, not during the trial.

A case in which the Court held that when a contract is silent on allocation of relief, the parties' intentions are best determined by the common-fund doctrine.

A case in which the Court held that, for purposes of liability for workplace harassment, the definition of "supervisor" is limited to a person empowered to take tangible employment action against the victim.