A case in which the Court determined that an intervenor to a lawsuit must meet the requirements of Article III standing if the intervenor wishes to pursue relief that was not already requested by the plaintiff.

A case in which the Court determined that a patentee’s decision to sell an item exhausts all of its patent rights in that item, even if the e patentee purports to impose post-sale restrictions, and regardless of whether the sale occurs domestically or internationally.

A case in which the Court determined that the crime of “unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor” as defined by California law cannot be categorically considered the aggravated felony of “sexual abuse of a minor” for the purpose of mandatory removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

A case in which the Court determined that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s provocation rule has no basis in the Fourth Amendment, and that the lower court erroneously conflated multiple Fourth Amendment violation claims.

A case in which the Court determined that the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) does not address the issue of whether state courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over railroads, and the Supreme Court’s precedent in Daimler AG v. Baumann controls a state court’s exercise of general jurisdiction.

A case in which the Court determined that the district court did not error in determining that North Carolina’s new districting plan constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, and neither claim nor issue preclusion based on the state court case dictate the outcome of this case.

A case in which the Court determined that the Hague Service Convention does not prohibit service of process by mail.

A case in which the Court held that the subsection of the general venue statute that allows a corporation to reside in many jurisdictions for the purpose of establishing jurisdiction does not apply to the patent venue statute.

A case in which the Court determined that the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act prevents state courts from treating the waived portion of military retirement pay as a divisible community asset for the purpose of divorce proceedings.

A case in which the Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts Kentucky state-law precedent that requires a clear statement in the power of attorney agreement in order to grant an attorney-in-fact the power to bind her principal to an arbitration agreement.