A case in which the Court determined that, in the absence of flagrant police misconduct, the discovery of a valid, pre-existing, and untainted arrest warrant attenuated the connection between the unconstitutional investigatory stop and the evidence seized incident to the lawful arrest.

A case in which the Court determined that, in a prosecution for robbery under the Hobbs Act, the commerce element is satisfied when the government shows that the defendant robbed a drug dealer of drugs or drug proceeds.

A case in which the Court held that some sections of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute can apply extraterritorially because Congress clearly based them on predicate offenses that can occur outside of the United States.

A case in which the Court held that, because the Department of Labor did not give adequate reasons for altering its position on whether service advisors are exempt from overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the case should be remanded for reinterpretation that does not give controlling weight to the Department’s 2011 position.

A case in which the Court held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may apply the broadest reasonable interpretation of patent claims during an inter partes review proceeding, and such a proceeding is not judicially reviewable.

A case in which the Court determined that the Court had jurisdiction to address the merits of the case even if the contracts had already been performed, and the Department of Veterans Affairs’ “set-aside” for veteran-owned businesses is mandatory.

A case in which the Court determined that, when deciding whether to grant attorney’s fees under Section 505 of the Copyright Act, courts should give substantial weight to the objective reasonableness of the losing party’s position, but that determination should not be the controlling factor.

A case in which the Court held that the implied certification test could be a valid basis for False Claims Act liability, and the conditions of payment with which the defendant allegedly failed to comply did not need to be explicitly stated.

A case in which the Court determined that the rigid two-part test is not necessary for determining whether a patentee is eligible for enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C §284.

A case in which the Court determined that Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code preempted the Puerto Rico statute that allowed public utilities to restructure their debt.