A case in which the Court held that "trademark tacking" is a mixed question of fact and law to be decided by the jury.

A case in which the Court ruled that the Whistleblower Protection Act bars an agency from taking enforcement action against employees who intentionally disclose sensitive security information.

A case in which the Court ruled that a federal appellate court can only overturn a district court’s finding of fact if those findings were determined to be “clearly erroneous.”

A case in which the Court held that the Department of Corrections' grooming policy violated an inmate's right to religious exercise.

A case in which the Court held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 does not require localities to provide reasons for their denial of construction applications in the written denial notification as long as the reasons appear in some other sufficiently clear written record.

A case in which the Court held that a federal habeas petitioner who prevailed in district court does not need to file a separate certificate of appealability to respond to the state's appeal.

A case in which the Court held that forced accompaniment during the commission of a crime occurs when a person requires another to “go with” him, even when that movement occurs over a short distance.

A case in which the Court ruled that the Truth in Lending Act allows a borrower to rescind a loan by notifying the creditor within the three-year time frame, even though a lawsuit has not yet been filed.

A case in which the Court ruled that a defendant seeking removal of a case to federal court is not required to provide evidence supporting federal jurisdiction in the notice of removal.

A case in which the Court decided that search and seizures are acceptable if a police officer made a reasonable factual or legal mistake.