
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In this episode Major Allen Abrams breaks down two recent cases from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. In Nelson the issue is whether the appellant voluntarily unlocked his cellular phone when he did so under a mistaken belief that, because the government had a search authorization, he had no choice but to unlock the phone. In Horne the court addressed a UCI issue created by trial counsel and victims counsel (I choose no apostrophe) colluding to deter AFOSI from interviewing the complainant's husband despite knowing the husband was the first "outcry" witness and had information favorable to the defense. Finally, Allen does a great job of describing how he allows the story of the case to present itself as he works through the facts, law, and questions the case presents. Enjoy!
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In this episode Major Allen Abrams breaks down two recent cases from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. In Nelson the issue is whether the appellant voluntarily unlocked his cellular phone when he did so under a mistaken belief that, because the government had a search authorization, he had no choice but to unlock the phone. In Horne the court addressed a UCI issue created by trial counsel and victims counsel (I choose no apostrophe) colluding to deter AFOSI from interviewing the complainant's husband despite knowing the husband was the first "outcry" witness and had information favorable to the defense. Finally, Allen does a great job of describing how he allows the story of the case to present itself as he works through the facts, law, and questions the case presents. Enjoy!

90,932 Listeners

43,818 Listeners

228,694 Listeners

38,800 Listeners

26,224 Listeners

153,509 Listeners

1,066 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

112,200 Listeners

56,496 Listeners

15,863 Listeners

26,623 Listeners

45 Listeners

22 Listeners

619 Listeners