USA Carry

MEMPHIS, TN — A man suffered a grazing gunshot wound early Monday morning in what police are calling an accidental discharge but should be called a negligent discharge caused by a dog. However, several details surrounding the incident raise questions about how the shooting actually occurred.

As reported by Action News 5, officers responded to a home on Whitney Avenue around 3:50 a.m. for a reported accidental injury. The victim told police he was lying in bed with a friend when his dog jumped onto the bed, got its paw stuck in the trigger guard of a firearm, and discharged a round. The bullet grazed the man’s left thigh.

His friend then left the scene, reportedly taking the firearm with her. When police arrived, they discovered spent shell casings on the front room floor. However, the report did not clarify whether there was a bed in that room, raising questions about where exactly the shooting took place. Additionally, the presence of multiple casings suggests that more than one round may have been fired.

The victim was transported to the hospital in non-critical condition. Police have not indicated whether they plan to investigate further.

While negligent discharges involving pets have been documented in rare cases, proper firearm safety practices could have prevented this incident. A loaded firearm should always be secured in a holster or locked in a safe when not in use. Leaving a gun unattended on a bed presents a significant risk, whether from a pet, a child, or even an adult unfamiliar with proper handling. This case also raises questions about whether someone else may have negligently fired the weapon rather than the dog. Regardless, this incident serves as a reminder that responsible firearm storage is critical to preventing accidents.

Read the original story: Memphis Man Grazed by Bullet After Dog Jumps on Bed Where He and Friend Were Lying and Allegedly Fires Gun

LOS ANGELES, CA — A man shot and killed his brother in a Beverly Grove home Friday afternoon after witnessing him violently attack their 80-year-old mother with a baseball bat, authorities said.

The incident occurred just before 1:30 p.m. near Alfred Street and Oakwood Avenue, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.

ABC7 reported that the 61-year-old suspect had broken into his mother’s home using a baseball bat before launching the attack. When the suspect’s brother arrived at the scene, he found his mother on the floor with the suspect on top of her, choking her.

According to LAPD Detective Samuel Marullo, the arriving brother initially fired a warning shot in an attempt to stop the assault. When the suspect did not relent, he fired again with a shotgun, fatally striking his sibling.

Investigators later learned that the suspect had allegedly made threats the night before but left before police could intervene. It does not appear he was living at the home at the time of the attack.

The suspect’s brother was initially taken into custody but was later determined to have acted in lawful self-defense. Authorities announced they would be releasing him without charges, ruling the shooting a justifiable homicide.

The elderly victim was transported to a hospital and is reported to be in stable condition. Police continue to investigate the motive behind the attack.

This tragic case highlights the harsh reality that violent threats can sometimes come from within a family. When facing a deadly attack—especially against a vulnerable loved one—armed self-defense can be the only viable option.

One key takeaway from this incident is the importance of understanding the proper use of force in self-defense. While it’s understandable that someone might want to fire a warning shot—especially in a situation as emotionally charged as stopping a violent attack by a family member—doing so is never a good idea. Warning shots can be unpredictable, endangering bystanders and potentially escalating the situation. Instead, if deadly force is justified, it should be used decisively to stop the threat. For a deeper understanding of why warning shots are both legally and tactically risky, check out this guide on warning shots in self-defense and this article explaining why they should never be used.

Read the original story: Los Angeles Man Fatally Shoots Brother to Stop Baseball Bat Attack on Elderly Mother

GRAND TERRACE, CA — A homeowner in Grand Terrace defended himself against multiple intruders on Tuesday night, resulting in one suspect’s death and two others being hospitalized.

According to the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, the incident occurred around 9:18 p.m. on March 4, 2025, in the 23000 block of Grand Terrace Road. The victim, whose identity has not been released, reported that several individuals broke into his home. Fearing for his life, the resident armed himself and opened fire on the intruders. The suspects then fled the scene in a white sedan.

Approximately ten minutes later, authorities in Loma Linda responded to a 76 gas station on Redlands Boulevard, where a man was found lying on the ground with gunshot wounds. He was accompanied by a 15-year-old male. The wounded suspect was transported to a hospital, where he later died. Investigators determined that both individuals were involved in the home invasion.

At about 10:05 p.m., the San Bernardino Police Department was alerted to another suspect, 25-year-old Marquez Jackson, who had arrived at a different hospital seeking treatment for a gunshot wound. He underwent surgery and remains hospitalized. Upon release, Jackson will be booked for robbery and murder charges. The juvenile suspect was also arrested on similar charges and booked into Juvenile Hall.

The fourth suspect involved in the crime remains at large, and law enforcement is actively seeking information.

California law allows the use of deadly force in self-defense if an individual reasonably believes they are in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In this case, the homeowner took swift action to protect himself when faced with multiple intruders. Home invasions are inherently dangerous, and residents should always have a plan for home security and self-defense.

Anyone with information about the fourth suspect is urged to contact the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Homicide Detail at 909-890-4904 or report tips anonymously via We-Tip at 1-800-78-CRIME (27463).

Read the original story: Homeowner Shoots Two of Three Intruders, Killing One in Grand Terrace Home Invasion

NEWINGTON, NH — SIG Sauer has issued a strong rebuttal against ongoing lawsuits and media reports alleging that its popular P320 pistol can fire without a trigger pull. In a March 7, 2025, press release titled The Truth About the P320, the company firmly stated that the firearm “CANNOT, under any circumstances, discharge without a trigger pull – that is a fact.”

This statement comes in response to years of litigation and accusations that the P320 is prone to unintended discharges. SIG Sauer asserts that these claims are being driven by individuals seeking financial gain or to push an anti-gun agenda, rather than being based on legitimate safety concerns.

The SIG Sauer P320 was introduced in 2014 and gained widespread adoption, particularly after being selected as the U.S. Army’s Modular Handgun System in 2017, under the designation M17 and M18. However, not long after its release, reports surfaced of the pistol discharging when dropped or jarred—without the trigger being pulled. This led to a voluntary upgrade program in 2017, in which SIG offered modifications to the pistol’s trigger mechanism and striker assembly to prevent potential issues.

Despite this upgrade, lawsuits continued, with plaintiffs claiming the P320 discharged unexpectedly in holsters or while being handled normally. Some lawsuits have been dismissed, and in others, expert testimony has reportedly supported SIG Sauer’s assertion that the pistol will not fire unless the trigger is deliberately actuated.

SIG Sauer maintains that all claims against the P320 have no factual basis, citing extensive testing and evaluations conducted by military and law enforcement agencies worldwide. According to the company, “lawsuits claiming that the P320 is capable of firing without the trigger being pulled have been dismissed in courtrooms around the country,” and expert witnesses for plaintiffs have acknowledged that the pistol will not fire unless the trigger is fully engaged.

In the press release, SIG Sauer directly calls out media outlets and attorneys pushing these lawsuits, accusing them of “clickbait farming, engagement hacking grifters” and warning that similar legal tactics could be used against other gun manufacturers in the future.

The P320 remains one of SIG Sauer’s most popular handguns, widely used by civilians, law enforcement, and military personnel. While some lawsuits are still active, SIG’s latest statement suggests that the company is taking a more aggressive approach in countering what it sees as misinformation.

For gun owners, this controversy underscores the importance of proper firearm handling, holster selection, and adherence to safety practices. Regardless of manufacturer claims, safe gun handling remains the best way to prevent unintended discharges.

This situation also serves as a reminder of the legal challenges firearm manufacturers face in an era of increased scrutiny and litigation. Whether SIG Sauer’s firm stance will put an end to the controversy remains to be seen.

Read the original story: SIG Sauer Defends P320 Amid Controversy Over Alleged Unintended Discharges

TERRE HAUTE, IN — A legally armed citizen stepped in to defend an O’Reilly Auto Parts employee after a suspect, armed with what appeared to be a handgun, threatened the worker on the evening of March 6, 2025. The confrontation ended with the suspect being shot multiple times and later found to be wielding an airsoft pistol.

According to the Terre Haute Police Department, officers responded just after 8:00 PM to a report of shots fired at the auto parts store in the 1900 block of South 3rd Street. Their investigation revealed that the suspect had initially arrived at the business to dispute a recent trespass order. After being asked to leave, the suspect refused, escalating into a brief physical altercation with an employee.

Following the altercation, the suspect returned to their vehicle, retrieved what was believed to be a firearm, and pointed it at the employee. At that moment, a bystander who was legally carrying a firearm intervened, shooting the suspect multiple times. The suspect fled the scene in a vehicle driven by a family member but was later located at a local hospital. Due to the severity of the injuries, they were transferred to an Indianapolis-area hospital, where they remain in stable condition.

Further investigation determined that the weapon used by the suspect was an airsoft pistol, which closely resembled a real firearm. Terre Haute Police detectives and the Vigo County Prosecutor’s Office are continuing to investigate the incident.

This incident demonstrates the importance of being prepared to act in a life-threatening situation. The armed citizen recognized an imminent threat when the suspect pointed what appeared to be a firearm at the employee and took decisive action to stop the attack.

For responsible gun owners, this serves as a reminder of the value of situational awareness and the ability to respond under pressure. Training regularly, understanding self-defense laws, and being prepared to protect yourself and others when necessary are key components of responsible firearm ownership.

Read the original story: Armed Citizen Shoots Suspect that Drew Airsoft Pistol on Employee at O’Reilly Auto Parts

PIERRE, SD — A bill that could significantly expand the right to carry concealed firearms on college campuses in South Dakota is now one step away from becoming law. Senate Bill 100, introduced by Senator Jim Voita, has cleared both chambers of the South Dakota Legislature and now awaits Governor Kristi Noem’s signature.

If signed, SB 100 would prevent public universities and technical colleges in South Dakota from imposing blanket bans on lawful concealed carry by permit holders. Specifically, the bill would allow individuals with enhanced, restricted enhanced, or reciprocal concealed carry permits to legally carry firearms on the grounds of public colleges and inside most campus buildings.

Under the legislation, the South Dakota Board of Regents, which oversees the state’s public universities, and the Board of Technical Education, which governs technical schools, would no longer be able to prohibit lawful concealed carry on campus. The bill covers not only firearms but also other self-defense tools, including stun guns, mace, and pepper spray.

According to the bill text, restrictions could still apply in certain specialized areas such as:

Outside of these designated areas, lawful permit holders would have the right to carry firearms and other self-defense tools anywhere else on campus, both indoors and outdoors.

Supporters of the bill argue that lawful gun owners should not be forced to leave their rights behind simply because they step onto a college campus. Proponents point out that South Dakota already requires enhanced permit holders to undergo additional training and background checks, ensuring that only responsible and vetted individuals would benefit from the expanded carry rights.

As reported by South Dakota Searchlight, Senator Voita emphasized that the bill is about protecting personal safety, noting, “Campuses aren’t immune from violence, and students and faculty shouldn’t be left defenseless just because they are pursuing higher education”.

With both legislative chambers approving the bill, the final decision now rests with Governor Kristi Noem. If she signs the bill into law, South Dakota would join a growing number of states that allow some form of campus carry.

This bill highlights the importance of understanding your local laws if you choose to carry a firearm for self-defense. Even in states that allow campus carry, there are often specific rules about where firearms are prohibited, how they must be stored, and what training is required. If you’re a student or faculty member with a valid permit, make sure you’re fully informed before carrying on campus. Responsible carry starts with knowing the law and committing to safe practices at all times.

Read the original story: South Dakota Advances Campus Carry Bill, Allowing Concealed Guns at Public Colleges and Universities

GLENWOOD, IL — A fatal shooting that took place outside a Glenwood bar on February 23, 2025, has been ruled self-defense following a comprehensive investigation by local authorities and the South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force. After reviewing surveillance footage, interviewing witnesses, and examining forensic evidence, the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office determined the shooter acted lawfully to protect themselves.

The incident occurred at approximately 1:30 a.m. in the parking lot of Chug A Lug, a bar and grill located at 18409 S Halsted. Glenwood Police responded to reports of shots fired and found a 31-year-old man suffering from a gunshot wound. Despite lifesaving efforts, the man was pronounced dead at the scene. Authorities have not yet released his name, pending family notification.

Investigators say the confrontation began as a dispute over parking between the deceased and a separate group, who were also leaving the bar at the time. None of the parties knew each other before the incident. During the argument, the deceased reportedly drew a handgun. In response, a member of the other group — a legally armed concealed carry license holder — drew their own firearm and fired, striking the man.

The shooter remained on the scene, immediately turning their firearm over to police. Officers also recovered the firearm belonging to the deceased. Following an extensive investigation, prosecutors concluded the shooting was a lawful act of self-defense, and no charges will be filed against the concealed carrier.

This incident highlights the importance of avoiding unnecessary confrontations, particularly in situations where emotions can escalate quickly, such as disputes over parking. However, when faced with an immediate and credible threat of deadly force, armed citizens are legally allowed to defend themselves. Responsible concealed carriers should always prioritize de-escalation when possible, while remaining prepared to act if their safety is put at risk.

It’s also worth remembering that if you are involved in a self-defense shooting, law enforcement will likely take possession of your firearm as evidence for the duration of the investigation. This is standard procedure, regardless of whether the shooting is ultimately deemed justified. For this reason, many experienced concealed carriers choose to own and train with a backup carry gun so they are not left unarmed while waiting for their primary firearm to be returned.

Read the original story: Illinois Concealed Carrier Cleared in Fatal Self-Defense Shooting Over Parking Spot Dispute Outside Bar

FRANKFORT, KY — A bill advancing through the Kentucky legislature would allow 18-year-olds to carry concealed firearms without a permit, lowering the current minimum age from 21. Senate Bill 75, sponsored by Sen. Lindsey Tichenor, passed the Senate Veterans, Military Affairs, and Public Protection Committee on March 6, 2025, and now moves to the full Senate for consideration.

The proposed legislation would amend Kentucky’s existing concealed carry law, which currently permits adults aged 21 or older to carry concealed deadly weapons without a license. Under SB 75, that age threshold would drop to 18, provided the individual is legally eligible to possess a firearm under both state and federal law.

Supporters of the bill, including Sen. Tichenor, argue that legal adults should have the right to defend themselves in the same way older adults do. “If an 18-year-old can vote, join the military, and get married, they should be able to protect themselves in public,” Tichenor stated during the committee hearing, according to WKYU Public Radio.

Currently, 18-year-olds in Kentucky can own firearms and openly carry them, but concealed carry—without a license—has been restricted to those 21 and older since Kentucky adopted permitless carry in 2019.

Critics of the bill, including gun control advocates and some law enforcement officials, express concern that younger adults lack the maturity and judgment to responsibly carry concealed firearms. Opponents have also raised concerns about potential risks on college campuses and in nightlife areas if the bill becomes law.

However, supporters counter that individuals under 21 who already qualify for concealed carry permits (such as members of the military) have shown they can responsibly carry firearms, and expanding this right to all legal adults is consistent with the Second Amendment.

Kentucky would not be the first state to lower the concealed carry age to 18. States like Missouri, Mississippi, and New Hampshire already allow permitless concealed carry for 18-year-olds. The trend is part of a broader push across conservative-led states to expand firearm rights, particularly for younger adults.

SB 75 now heads to the full Kentucky Senate for a vote. If approved, it will proceed to the House. If ultimately passed and signed into law, Kentucky would become one of a growing number of states lowering the concealed carry age to 18.

In any state where permitless carry is allowed, responsible firearms ownership and training remain essential, regardless of age. For 18-year-olds who may soon be eligible to carry concealed, it’s highly recommended to pursue professional firearms training, understand Kentucky’s self-defense laws, and practice safe handling at all times. Knowing when the law allows you to use force—and when it doesn’t—is crucial for any armed citizen.

Read the original story: Kentucky Senate Advances Bill to Lower Concealed Carry Age to 18

NEW YORK CITY, NY — Nine New York City residents who applied for concealed carry licenses have filed a federal lawsuit against the City of New York, accusing the city of unconstitutional delays in processing their applications. The case, Milani et al. v. New York City, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and directly challenges the New York Police Department’s License Division over excessive, unreasonable, and unjustifiable processing times that plaintiffs say violate their Second Amendment rights.

The plaintiffs, who applied for various types of firearms licenses including concealed carry permits, say the city’s licensing process is plagued by administrative dysfunction, causing applications to languish for months—or even years. Despite New York State law requiring decisions on firearm license applications within six months, the complaint documents widespread violations of that legal deadline.

The lawsuit describes the licensing process as riddled with bureaucratic roadblocks:

The plaintiffs argue these persistent delays amount to a de facto denial of their right to keep and bear arms. The lawsuit claims the city is violating the Second and Fourteenth Amendments by obstructing lawful citizens from obtaining concealed carry licenses. The complaint seeks a court order forcing the city to comply with the six-month deadline, as well as damages and legal fees.

This lawsuit emerges after the landmark 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which struck down New York’s restrictive “proper cause” requirement for concealed carry licenses. Following Bruen, New Yorkers flooded the NYPD’s License Division with concealed carry applications, but this lawsuit claims that instead of streamlining the process, the city has doubled down on unnecessary delays and administrative inefficiency.

For residents seeking to lawfully carry a concealed firearm for self-defense, these delays could have serious consequences. Being forced to wait more than a year leaves applicants unarmed and vulnerable while their paperwork drags through a broken system. Although background checks and verification are expected, arbitrary delays are not.

If the plaintiffs succeed, this case could reshape the way New York City handles concealed carry license applications—potentially forcing the city to adopt a more efficient, transparent, and timely process that better respects constitutional rights.

The plaintiffs, along with supporters from the New York 2A community, have launched a GoFundMe campaign to help fund this critical legal battle. The campaign, titled “Support the New York 2A Community’s Legal Battle,” aims to raise awareness and gather financial support to sustain the lawsuit as it progresses through the courts. Those who want to stand with these plaintiffs and support their fight for timely access to their constitutional rights can contribute directly at: Support the New York 2A Community’s Legal Battle.

This case has the potential to set a vital precedent for concealed carry applicants not just in New York City, but across the country where bureaucratic delays are used to obstruct lawful gun ownership.

Read the original story: NYC Concealed Carry Applicants File Federal Lawsuit Over Extreme Licensing Delays

TERRE HAUTE, IN — A negligent discharge incident at Top Guns, a well-known shooting range and gun store in Indiana, left one man injured earlier this week. The incident, which occurred before the man had even begun shooting, serves as an important reminder of the risks posed by improper holster selection and handling.

According to Steve Ellis, the owner of Top Guns, the customer was preparing to shoot and was in the process of holstering his firearm when the negligent discharge occurred. The man was using a leather holster with a floppy retention strap—a design that has been known to create safety issues if the strap enters the trigger guard during reholstering. In this case, the strap made its way into the trigger guard and pressed against the trigger as the man pushed his handgun into place, causing the gun to discharge.

The round struck the man in the leg, entering just above his knee and exiting near his ankle. Staff at Top Guns responded immediately, providing critical first aid by applying tourniquets to control the bleeding. Emergency responders arrived shortly afterward, and the injured man was transported to a local hospital where he was listed in stable condition. Ellis credited his staff’s quick and calm response with saving the man’s life.

This incident highlights the importance of selecting a quality holster and paying attention to your surroundings when holstering a firearm. A proper holster should fully cover the trigger once the gun is secured, but it’s equally important for the user to ensure nothing—like a jacket drawstring, loose clothing, or an unsecured retention strap—can enter the trigger guard during reholstering. Holsters with floppy leather retention straps, like the one involved in this incident, pose a particular risk because the strap can easily fold into the holster’s opening and press against the trigger before the firearm is fully seated. This combination of holster design and user oversight makes reholstering a critical moment that requires care and attention.

Additionally, Ellis emphasized the value of visually confirming the holster is clear before inserting a firearm. While some shooters believe reholstering should be done by feel alone, the reality is that during non-stressful situations, such as at a range or during training, there is no reason not to look your firearm into the holster. This simple habit can prevent unintentional discharges caused by obstructions.

Another helpful tip shared by Ellis is to adjust your body position when holstering to minimize the risk of a round striking your body if an unintentional discharge occurs. For those carrying at the 3 or 4 o’clock position, this could mean angling the strong-side leg inward to move it out of the line of fire. If you carry in the appendix position, you can achieve a similar effect by pushing your hips forward to create a safer angle while holstering. This simple adjustment is an effective way to follow one of the core firearm safety rules: keeping the firearm pointed in a safe direction at all times.

This case serves as an unfortunate but valuable reminder that firearm safety doesn’t end when the trigger finger leaves the trigger. Reholstering is a critical moment that deserves just as much attention to safety as firing the gun itself. By selecting quality holsters, being deliberate when reholstering, and maintaining muzzle awareness, shooters can greatly reduce their risk of experiencing a similar incident.

Read the original story: Negligent Discharge at Indiana Range Serves as Reminder of Holster Safety