USA Carry

DES MOINES, IA — Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds signed Senate File 106 into law on May 6, 2025, authorizing the lawful possession of loaded firearms while operating or riding snowmobiles and all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) under specific conditions.

Previously, Iowa law required that firearms transported on snowmobiles or ATVs be unloaded and stored in a carrying case. SF 106 removes those restrictions, now permitting the carry of a loaded firearm—whether concealed or not—when on land that the person owns, possesses, or rents, provided the individual’s conduct is otherwise lawful. Additionally, the law allows for the carry of a loaded pistol or revolver, even on land not owned or controlled by the person, again provided the activity remains lawful.

The bill also maintains the prohibition on discharging a firearm from a moving snowmobile or ATV. However, nonambulatory individuals are allowed to discharge a firearm from a stationary snowmobile or ATV while lawfully hunting.

Key provisions of SF 106 include:

The legislation passed both chambers with strong majorities: 93-3 in the House and 42-8 in the Senate.

This new law aligns Iowa with other states that have similarly modernized their firearm transportation laws to reflect responsible gun ownership and to support hunters and rural residents who rely on off-road vehicles.

This change is a win for lawful gun owners, particularly those in rural areas who often travel their own property by ATV or snowmobile. By eliminating unnecessary restrictions, Iowa’s legislature has taken a step toward recognizing the practicality of carrying a loaded firearm while off-roading, particularly for self-defense in remote areas. The law strikes a balance by keeping discharge prohibitions intact except for nonambulatory hunters, maintaining safety while affirming Second Amendment rights.

Read the original story: New Iowa Law Lets Gun Owners Carry Loaded Firearms on Off-Road Vehicles, ATVs and Snowmobiles Without a Permit

GREECE, NY — A store owner at Henry’s Convenience Store shot a teenage robbery suspect in self-defense during an attempted armed robbery early Tuesday morning, according to Greece Police.

As reported by WHEC, the 17-year-old suspect entered the Denise Road store wearing a mask and pointing a firearm at the clerk. The clerk, who is a licensed pistol permit holder, responded by drawing his legally registered handgun and firing at the suspect. The teen sustained a gunshot wound to the leg and fled the scene, later found by officers on nearby Lake Avenue. A Greece police officer applied a tourniquet before the suspect was transported to Strong Hospital for surgery. He remains hospitalized under the supervision of the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office.

Police say the suspect is also connected to a prior robbery at the same location on April 26, during which he allegedly brandished a firearm and stole cash and other property. In Tuesday’s incident, officers recovered the teen’s firearm at the scene. Surveillance video from the first robbery has been shared by police to support their investigation.

Authorities praised the clerk’s lawful use of self-defense, with Deputy Chief Naser Zenelovic stating, “He used a legally registered handgun in what appears to be the defense of himself and the store.” The store owner, who was unharmed, has cooperated fully with law enforcement and declined media interviews until consulting with legal counsel. The number of shots fired during the exchange has not been disclosed.

The store has since reopened. Some local residents expressed concerns over safety in the area following two armed incidents at the same store within ten days.

Incidents like this underscore the risks faced by small business owners, particularly those working early or late hours in urban environments. Convenience stores are frequent targets for quick, armed robberies, making it crucial for store operators to consider lawful means of protection. This clerk’s calm, prepared response and subsequent cooperation with authorities provide a model of responsible defensive firearm use.

Read the original story: Store Clerk Shoots Armed Teen Robber in Self-Defense During Morning Hold-Up

RALEIGH, NC — In a significant advancement for Second Amendment rights in North Carolina, the House passed House Bill 674, known as the “Firearms Liberty Act,” on May 7 with a 70-42 vote. The legislation introduces lifetime concealed carry permits, streamlines renewals for lapsed permits, expands options for firearm storage during domestic violence protective orders, and enhances school safety protocols with defensive devices in biometric safes.

The bill now moves to the Senate after clearing its third reading in the House.

The bill allows North Carolina residents to apply for a concealed carry permit with no expiration date. While current law only provides for five-year permits, this option enables permit holders to avoid repetitive renewals while still subject to revocation if disqualified.

HB 674 extends the grace period for lapsed concealed carry permits. If a permit has been expired for fewer than 180 days, the applicant is no longer required to retake a firearms safety course. Sheriffs may also waive the training requirement for renewals up to one year after expiration.

The legislation also addresses the rights of gun owners under domestic violence protective orders. Individuals ordered to surrender firearms may now transfer those firearms to a qualified federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL) after 15 days, rather than storing them exclusively with the sheriff. This provision ensures that lawful owners maintain property rights while complying with court orders.

FFLs entering into private “safety hold agreements” with firearm owners—where the firearm is voluntarily held for safekeeping—will now have protection from liability, provided there is no gross negligence. This provision encourages responsible gun ownership by offering a safe, voluntary method for temporarily storing firearms during times of crisis or concern.

The act authorizes trained school employees to access non-lethal defensive devices—such as chemical sprays or electronic incapacitation tools—secured in biometric safes on school property. These tools may only be used in response to a justified threat and are subject to annual training requirements set by the Center for Safer Schools in conjunction with state law enforcement training bodies.

HB 674 reflects a thoughtful and responsible approach to gun rights and public safety. By introducing lifetime concealed carry permits and reducing bureaucratic hurdles for law-abiding citizens, the General Assembly has reaffirmed its commitment to supporting the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Simultaneously, the bill incorporates meaningful safeguards—especially in the areas of domestic violence and school safety—ensuring that enhanced gun rights do not come at the cost of public wellbeing.

Empowering responsible gun owners while improving security infrastructure, this legislation is a strong model for balancing liberty and safety.

Now that the bill has passed the House, it has been referred to the Senate’s Rules and Operations Committee as of May 8. If approved in committee, it will move to the Senate floor for a vote. If passed without amendment, it would proceed to the governor’s desk for signature. However, if the Senate makes changes, the bill would return to the House for concurrence. Key provisions—including the lifetime permit option and biometric school safety measures—are set to take effect in late 2025 and early 2026, pending final legislative approval.

Read the original story: North Carolina House Approves “Firearms Liberty Act” Offering Lifetime Carry Permits and New School Safety Measures

DALTON, GA — An early morning confrontation between a homeowner and a group of alleged car burglars escalated into gunfire on May 3, 2025, in a residential area near Pleasant Drive and Old Grade Road. According to a statement from Whitfield County Sheriff Darren J. Pierce, the homeowner reported that several individuals were attempting to break into his vehicle and possibly his residence around 5:15 a.m.

Upon witnessing the suspects’ actions, the homeowner exited his house and fired multiple shots. One of the rounds struck a female suspect, who was subsequently transported by emergency medical services. Her identity has not been released as she continues to receive medical care.

Deputies arrested Tristen Knight in connection with the incident, charging him with felony entering auto. Authorities indicate that further charges are pending for the injured female suspect. No charges have been filed against the homeowner at this time, though the case has been referred to the District Attorney’s Office for review.

The sheriff’s office did not confirm whether the suspects were armed or how many individuals were involved in total. The presence of multiple suspects and their aggressive actions—reportedly trying to open the back door of the home—created what appeared to be a chaotic scene.

While the homeowner was unharmed, the decision to confront multiple suspects outside his home introduced significant risks. In situations involving potential home invasions or burglaries, we advise residents to stay inside and call 911. Leaving the safety of a secure location to engage unknown and potentially armed suspects can drastically escalate the danger.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the unpredictable nature of defensive gun use scenarios. While armed self-defense is a right, tactical decisions—like staying inside a secure home and awaiting law enforcement—can sometimes be the safer course of action, especially when outnumbered.

Read the original story: Homeowner Opens Fire on Group Attempting Car Burglary and Home Invasion in Early Morning Incident

I got early access to read this book because Robert M. Kurtz is one of our contributing writers at USA Carry. You can find his articles here. His writing style on the site mirrors what you’ll find in this book: clear, practical, and filled with insight from real-world experience.

Mercenaries, Gunslingers, and Outlaws: Two Years as a Security Contractor in Iraq isn’t your typical war memoir. There’s no attempt to glamorize the job. No manufactured drama. No “Hollywood-style” missions. What you get instead is something far more valuable—an unvarnished, boots-on-the-ground look at the daily life of a private security contractor during one of the most chaotic periods in Iraq.

Right from the start, Kurtz sets the tone with a line that stuck with me:

“…then I hope it gives you at least some idea of what it was like to be a private security contractor in Iraq during a long and very dirty insurgent war.”

And that’s exactly what this book delivers.

The value lies in the details. It’s not just the broad strokes of convoys, checkpoints, or IEDs—it’s the way he describes planes spiraling down into Baghdad International Airport to avoid missile fire. Or the offhand mention that a DHL cargo plane was hit. These kinds of real-world details immerse you in the experience and give you a true sense of what it was like to live and work in that environment.

Some of the funniest moments come from the absurdities of warzone logistics. In Chapter 20, an Iraqi mechanic is told the left rear window needs to work, so he pulls the motor out of the right one to make it happen—mission accomplished, sort of. Page 46 had me laughing out loud when he described how they kept cutting the ends off brand-new extension cords, stripping the wires, and plugging them directly into outlets—an OSHA nightmare, if OSHA had jurisdiction in Iraq.

But it’s not all humor. Kurtz also delivers thoughtful insight into the mindset and stress contractors lived with. By the time I hit Chapter 33, it became clear—this book isn’t just about firefights and adrenaline. It’s about long hours, moments of isolation, and having to figure things out when you’re truly on your own.

One moment that stood out was in Chapter 64—a reflection on the difference between being the person who saves others and the one who might need saving. The way Kurtz breaks down that shift in perspective—how physical size, for example, affects rescue scenarios—was a rare bit of emotional depth not often seen in books from this genre.

If you’re looking for a romanticized take on private military contracting, this isn’t it. But if you want a book that tells it like it was, with a mix of gritty reality, dark humor, and clear-eyed storytelling, Mercenaries, Gunslingers, and Outlaws is worth your time.

Read the original story: Book Review: Mercenaries, Gunslingers, and Outlaws by Robert M. Kurtz

SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VA — A homeowner in Virginia is facing a murder charge after allegedly shooting and killing an 18-year-old during what teens claim was a social media prank — but one that may not be as innocent as it sounds.

The homeowner, a 27-year-old Spotsylvania County resident, has been charged with second-degree murder, malicious wounding, and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. The incident occurred around 3 a.m. Saturday at a residence on McKenzie Lane, just hours before the deceased teen was scheduled to attend his high school prom.

According to the Spotsylvania County Sheriff’s Office, the homeowner reported that three individuals were attempting to break into his home. He opened fire, fatally wounding one teen and grazing another. A third teen was not injured.

However, the surviving teens gave a different account. They said they were recording videos for TikTok, specifically claiming they were performing a prank known as “ding-dong ditch” — ringing doorbells and running away. One teen even provided detectives with a phone containing similar videos recorded earlier that evening.

As reported by NBC Washington, the sheriff’s office has not confirmed whether the evidence supports the teens’ version of events or the homeowner’s account of a break-in. The commonwealth’s attorney is currently reviewing the facts to determine if the use of force was justified.

But the story may be more complicated than a simple prank. After experiencing a similar event firsthand, it’s clear that some of these so-called pranks can be far more aggressive. What I later learned after a personal encounter last year is that there is also a trend called the “TikTok Door Kick Challenge.” Unlike traditional “ding-dong ditch” antics, this challenge involves teens violently kicking front doors to shock or scare the residents — a far more threatening and invasive act.

In my own case (video shown above), two teens from the neighborhood back-kicked the front door of my girlfriend’s home and ran off — all within seconds. We were sitting just feet away, I barely had time to react. Reviewing the video later made it clear that this wasn’t a harmless prank — it was an aggressive act designed to provoke a reaction.

That context raises a critical question in the Spotsylvania case: were these teens ringing doorbells as part of a prank, or were they participating in the TikTok Door Kick Challenge, which involves forcefully kicking doors to simulate a break-in? The difference matters — not just in perception, but in how a homeowner might interpret the intent behind the action. At first glance, a loud, aggressive door kick can appear to be a genuine forced entry attempt. But if the individuals immediately run off, as they often do in these challenges, it complicates any claim of an ongoing threat. We don’t yet know what exactly happened in this case, and further details, such as surveillance footage or forensic evidence, will be essential to determining what actions were reasonable.

Speaking from personal experience, if I had responded with gunfire during a similar incident at my girlfriend’s home, I don’t believe it would have been justified. The kids kicked the door and ran off within seconds. If the kicking had continued or escalated, arming oneself could be a more understandable response. Another important consideration is the issue of shooting through a closed door — something that may or may not have occurred in this case. Generally, it’s a risky decision. You can’t identify who or what is on the other side, and there’s the potential danger of bullets exiting your home and endangering others. In any defensive situation, identifying the threat clearly and ensuring your actions are legally and morally defensible should be the priority.

Read the original story: Homeowner Charged with Murder After Teen Fatally Shot During Alleged Break-In That Friends Say Was TikTok Prank

ST. PAUL, MN — The Minnesota Department of Public Safety has officially expanded its concealed carry permit reciprocity to include 33 states, significantly increasing recognition of out-of-state permits. This move follows the outcome of Worth v. Jacobson, a federal court case that struck down Minnesota’s age restriction preventing 18- to 20-year-olds from obtaining a carry permit.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2023 that the age restriction violated the Second Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the state’s appeal in April 2025, leaving the ruling in place. As a result, Minnesota has updated its reciprocity policies to recognize permits from states that issue to 18- to 20-year-olds, aligning with constitutional standards.

The newly updated list includes:

This update ensures that law-abiding permit holders traveling to Minnesota from these states are recognized under the law. It also affirms the rights of peaceable young adults aged 18–20 to carry under the same legal protections as older adults.

For those looking to understand how Minnesota’s changes affect national reciprocity, the updated interactive concealed carry reciprocity maps offer a comprehensive and user-friendly way to view which states recognize each other’s permits. The map has already been revised to reflect Minnesota’s expanded recognition and is a valuable tool for travelers and concealed carriers nationwide.

This change is a win for responsible gun owners who rely on uniform recognition while traveling and a reminder of how court decisions can reinforce constitutional rights for all adults, regardless of age.

Read the original story: Minnesota Expands Concealed Carry Reciprocity to 33 States Following Court Ruling

ST. LOUIS, MO — A 16-year-old was fatally shot early Friday morning during a string of vehicle break-ins in the Carondelet neighborhood, according to the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department.

The incident occurred around 2 a.m. in the 6300 block of Vermont Avenue, near Holly Hills Avenue. Police said the teen, identified as Aeyion Barnett of St. Louis, was among a group of suspects who exited a dark-colored vehicle and began breaking into multiple cars. Neighbors reported that at least six vehicles were targeted.

Home surveillance footage captured the group moving from car to car. Disturbingly, witnesses reported that one suspect acted as a lookout, pointing a gun at nearby homes to deter anyone from intervening.

A resident, hoping to scare the suspects away, reportedly fired two warning shots into the ground from his backyard. In response, the suspects returned fire toward the resident, and during the exchange, Barnett was struck in the head.

His accomplices transported him to Barnes-Jewish Hospital, where he later died. Police stated that the same vehicle may have been involved in additional break-ins earlier that morning outside the city.

“This neighborhood is very safe,” one resident said. “But this has happened several times over the past eight months. It’s shocking.”

The death of the teen marks the first homicide in the Carondelet neighborhood this year. Authorities are asking anyone with information to contact the St. Louis Homicide Division or CrimeStoppers.

This tragic case highlights several critical points in defensive gun use. First, while the urge to confront suspects breaking into a vehicle is understandable, it’s important to remember that such situations can quickly escalate. In this case, the suspects were armed and had stationed lookouts with firearms—underscoring the real and present danger. Second, firing warning shots, although intended to deter, often has the opposite effect. Here, it escalated the situation, leading to an exchange of gunfire that could have injured or killed innocent bystanders. Fortunately, no residents were harmed, but this incident is a sobering reminder of the risks involved in engaging with unknown threats.

Read the original story: St. Louis Teen Shot by Fellow Suspects After Resident Fires Warning Shots During Car Break-In

JENNINGS, MO — A robbery attempt at a local market turned into a shootout Thursday evening, leaving both the suspect and intended victim injured and hospitalized.

According to First Alert 4, the incident occurred around 5:30 p.m. at a market on the 5200 block of Hamilton Avenue. The victim was standing at the counter when 23-year-old Tayvion Baker allegedly approached him armed with a pistol. Police say Baker spotted a handgun in a holster on the victim’s hip, which was reportedly concealed under his shirt. It is unclear how Baker noticed the firearm, but he then attempted to take it.

Baker reportedly grabbed the firearm and threatened the victim, saying, “give it to me, I’m finnin to pop you.” A violent struggle ensued, during which Baker shot the victim twice. The victim returned fire, striking Baker.

After being shot, Baker fled the store, but the victim pursued him outside and continued shooting as the suspect attempted to escape. Both men were later transported to a local hospital for treatment. Their current conditions have not been released.

Police later discovered that Baker’s firearm had been modified with an illegal switch, converting it to full auto. Baker now faces multiple charges including two counts of armed criminal action, attempted robbery, assault, and unlawful possession and modification of a firearm.

This case highlights two critical considerations for concealed carriers. First, proper concealment is essential. If a firearm is visible or easily identified under clothing, it may draw the attention of criminals and escalate a situation, as appeared to happen here. Second, the use of deadly force must stop once the immediate threat has ended. Pursuing and continuing to shoot at a fleeing suspect can have serious legal consequences. Always prioritize de-escalation and adhere strictly to self-defense laws.

Read the original story: Robbery Suspect and Armed Victim Both Shot After Struggle Over Gun in Missouri Market

ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FL — In the early hours of Sunday morning, a 35-year-old man was shot in self-defense after allegedly attacking an elderly couple in their Escambia County home.

As reported by WEAR-TV, deputies responded to reports of gunfire around 1:05 a.m. on Rebel Drive. Upon arrival, they found Daniel Michael Sonier suffering from a gunshot wound. Investigations revealed that Sonier, who was known to the couple, had entered their home and assaulted them. In response, the male resident used a firearm to defend himself and his partner. Sonier was transported to a local hospital for treatment of non-life-threatening injuries and was remotely booked on charges of felony battery on a person 65 years of age or older and felony criminal mischief with property damage. He is currently being held without bond.”

This incident highlights the fundamental legal principle that individuals have the right to use force, including deadly force, to defend themselves against an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. When someone forcibly enters a home and begins a violent assault, the law generally recognizes the homeowner’s right to respond with a firearm to stop the attack. Training and preparedness can be critical in these moments, especially for those who may be physically vulnerable. Responsible gun ownership paired with a clear understanding of self-defense laws is essential for anyone seeking to protect themselves and their loved ones.

Read the original story: Elderly man opens fire on 35-year-old intruder who violently attacked him and his wife during terrifying home incident