
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
This is the first episode! (So allow some grace.) The episode discusses United States v. Tyler, Crim. App. No. 29572, C.A.A.F., April 26, 2021, which held that the unsworn victim impact statement is not evidence but it may, nonetheless, be commented on by trial counsel in sentencing argument. The court also stressed the role of the military judge as gatekeeper to ensure that the statement contains only proper victim impact. At 11:08 the episode shifts gears and discusses the concept of "depth" on cross-examination. I hope you find it helpful!
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
This is the first episode! (So allow some grace.) The episode discusses United States v. Tyler, Crim. App. No. 29572, C.A.A.F., April 26, 2021, which held that the unsworn victim impact statement is not evidence but it may, nonetheless, be commented on by trial counsel in sentencing argument. The court also stressed the role of the military judge as gatekeeper to ensure that the statement contains only proper victim impact. At 11:08 the episode shifts gears and discusses the concept of "depth" on cross-examination. I hope you find it helpful!

113,272 Listeners

56,991 Listeners

14,337 Listeners

15,491 Listeners

29,273 Listeners

16,489 Listeners