This time it is the supreme court which had to intervene in the case of an order relating to the AI Hallucinated Judgement.

A Mumbai founder built a streetwear brand from his apartment. Two years of work. Seventy orders a month. Then he found out someone else had trademarked his name. This is the most common mistake in Indian business — and it costs ₹4,500 to avoid.

In this episode: what a trademark actually is under Indian law, why using a brand name doesn't mean you own it, the difference between registration and passing off, and the one filing every founder should make before they print their first business card.

Story is fictional. The law is real. Trade Marks Act, 1999 — Sections 2, 18, 27, 28.

VListen is a VirtuaLaw podcast. New episodes weekly.

A missed EMI does not make you a criminal. In India, loan default is strictly a civil matter, yet aggressive recovery agents often cross legal boundaries with threats, off-hour calls, and public shaming.

In this brief 2-minute episode, we break down:

• The RBI Fair Practices Code limits on calling hours (8 AM – 7 PM) and contact rules.

• Exact legal prohibitions against harassment, threats, and privacy violations.

• A 3-step escalation process: from the lender’s Grievance Redressal Officer to the RBI Integrated Ombudsman (cms.rbi.org.in).

• When and how to file a criminal complaint or report illegal digital lending apps on Helpline 1930.

Know your rights, protect your dignity, and learn how to build an airtight paper trail.

An AI invented three judgments. A State Tax Officer cited them in a GST order. On 20 August 2026, the Gujarat High Court set the whole thing aside.

SC judge strength increases now

The Bombay HC ruled that PGs cannot claim any interim moratorium protection in the pending matters before NCLT as the IBC Amendment of 2026 to Section 96(4) is retroactive.

Imagine a court ruling based on a fake, fabricated and hallucinated precedent generated by artifical intelligence.

In this episode, hosts Prakul Thadi and Bendi Raviteja explore the complex intersection between the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Can enforcement under PMLA continue once insolvency proceedings begin? What happens to ED-attached properties during a resolution process? Are both laws complementary — or conflicting?

We break down:
• Key Supreme Court & NCLAT rulings
• Real-world implications for corporate debt and criminal liability
• What law students, CS aspirants, and young professionals should know

Brought to you by VirtuaLaw, where we simplify complex legal intersections for students and professionals alike.

🎧 Tune in to gain clarity on a high-stakes legal conflict that shapes India’s corporate and criminal law landscape.

In this episode of VListen, we unpack one of India’s most intricate corporate insolvency battles — the saga of Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL) and JSW Steel.

Join host Prakul Thadi as we explore how the Supreme Court of India delivered three landmark judgments in this case:

• Rejecting the Resolution Plan initially due to implementation delays,

• Recalling its own order in a rare judicial course correction, and

• Delivering a decisive verdict upholding the Resolution Plan, reaffirming the primacy of the Committee of Creditors’ commercial wisdom and the core purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

We break down the legal rationale, highlight critical judicial principles, and explain why this saga is a landmark in corporate insolvency jurisprudence.

🎧 Listen to this episode for:

• Detailed timelines and case facts

• Judicial reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decisions

• Lessons for insolvency professionals, lawyers, and corporate stakeholders

VListen — your companion for deep insights into insolvency, corporate law, and landmark judgments.

Dive into the groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling on Byju’s insolvency case, which redefines the use of Rule 11 and reaffirms the importance of procedural safeguards under Section 12A of the IBC. This episode unpacks the legal nuances, critiques the NCLAT’s approach, and highlights the limitations of inherent powers of Tribunals when procedural framework is laid out under the law.