
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Dan McCarthy, who edits Modern Age, thinks that what many believe to be “good” democratic citizenship is completely unrealistic. He challenges the idea that voters need expert-level knowledge and instead argues that elections are really judgments about whether life is getting better or worse. Along the way, he exposes the tension between intellectual elites and ordinary voters and why humility might be the missing ingredient in our politics. It’s a sharp, provocative conversation about expertise, democracy, and who we trust to know the truth.
When We Disagree is on holiday break until early January.
Tell us your argument stories!
By Michael Lee5
1818 ratings
Dan McCarthy, who edits Modern Age, thinks that what many believe to be “good” democratic citizenship is completely unrealistic. He challenges the idea that voters need expert-level knowledge and instead argues that elections are really judgments about whether life is getting better or worse. Along the way, he exposes the tension between intellectual elites and ordinary voters and why humility might be the missing ingredient in our politics. It’s a sharp, provocative conversation about expertise, democracy, and who we trust to know the truth.
When We Disagree is on holiday break until early January.
Tell us your argument stories!

90,980 Listeners

43,594 Listeners

25,807 Listeners

3,981 Listeners

112,426 Listeners

56,545 Listeners

6,430 Listeners

57,852 Listeners

15,948 Listeners

41,568 Listeners

2,838 Listeners