
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Dan McCarthy, who edits Modern Age, thinks that what many believe to be “good” democratic citizenship is completely unrealistic. He challenges the idea that voters need expert-level knowledge and instead argues that elections are really judgments about whether life is getting better or worse. Along the way, he exposes the tension between intellectual elites and ordinary voters and why humility might be the missing ingredient in our politics. It’s a sharp, provocative conversation about expertise, democracy, and who we trust to know the truth.
When We Disagree is on holiday break until early January.
Tell us your argument stories!
By Michael Lee5
1818 ratings
Dan McCarthy, who edits Modern Age, thinks that what many believe to be “good” democratic citizenship is completely unrealistic. He challenges the idea that voters need expert-level knowledge and instead argues that elections are really judgments about whether life is getting better or worse. Along the way, he exposes the tension between intellectual elites and ordinary voters and why humility might be the missing ingredient in our politics. It’s a sharp, provocative conversation about expertise, democracy, and who we trust to know the truth.
When We Disagree is on holiday break until early January.
Tell us your argument stories!

91,297 Listeners

43,687 Listeners

26,012 Listeners

4,022 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

56,944 Listeners

6,457 Listeners

58,365 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

41,512 Listeners

2,854 Listeners