Waatea News: Māori Radio Station

A New Zealand fintech turning everyday purchases into automatic KiwiSaver contributions has earned a place on one of the world’s biggest startup stages, with Feijoa named among the finalists for the 2026 Startup World Cup New Zealand regional final.

Feijoa co-founder Mark White-Robinson says the idea behind the platform is deliberately simple — make building long-term savings something that happens in the background of everyday life rather than requiring people to constantly make another financial decision.

The app connects everyday spending with KiwiSaver by rounding purchases up to the nearest dollar and directing the difference into a nominated KiwiSaver account. It can also be used to contribute to another person’s account, allowing parents, grandparents and other whānau to help build savings for people they care about.

Buy something for $5.50 and the remaining 50 cents to the next dollar can become a KiwiSaver contribution.

Individually those amounts can appear insignificant.

Repeated hundreds of times over months and years, however, they can become meaningful additional savings — particularly once investment returns and compounding are taken into account.

Feijoa says its users have been contributing an average of about $2.60 a day, equivalent to close to $1,000 in additional KiwiSaver contributions each year. Earlier this year the company said its users collectively were contributing at a rate equivalent to around $2 million annually.

The company has since reported passing $1 million actually added to New Zealanders’ KiwiSaver accounts, estimating that continued contributions by its current users could potentially add substantially more to their balances over coming decades.

White-Robinson’s argument is that one of the barriers to saving is behavioural.

Spending happens naturally.

Saving usually requires a deliberate decision.

Feijoa attempts to reverse that equation by making small contributions automatic.

That approach could be particularly relevant for people whose KiwiSaver contributions are less predictable, including some self-employed workers, contractors and people working part-time who do not necessarily have the same regular contribution patterns as full-time PAYE employees.

It also provides another option for whānau wanting to contribute towards the future of tamariki and mokopuna without needing large amounts of money upfront.

The concept is now attracting attention well beyond its growing customer base.

Feijoa participated in Creative HQ’s Fintech Lab 2026, where it developed its business alongside 11 other fintech companies.

During the programme it won the Audience Choice award at the Kiwibank Start Up Pitch Breakfast and was subsequently named an innovation finalist in the INFINZ Awards.

Now Feijoa has been selected alongside other New Zealand technology and innovation businesses for the Startup World Cup New Zealand Final.

The regional winner gets the opportunity to represent Aotearoa within the international Startup World Cup ecosystem, with the global competition offering an investment prize of US$1 million.

There is also a broader conversation sitting behind the technology.

KiwiSaver has become an increasingly important component of household wealth in Aotearoa, supporting both retirement savings and, for eligible members, first-home ownership.

But people’s ability to contribute is not equal.

Households facing higher living costs or irregular income can find it considerably harder to put additional money aside.

For Māori whānau, that matters within the wider conversation about financial capability, home ownership, intergenerational wealth and the Māori economy.

An app cannot eliminate structural wealth inequality or create income that a household does not have.

But tools that make small-scale saving easier can potentially help more whānau turn whatever spare capacity they do have into a longer-term asset.

Feijoa’s success also demonstrates the growing role of New Zealand’s fintech sector in developing products around everyday financial behaviour.

The company does not operate a KiwiSaver scheme itself and says it does not directly access or manage users’ KiwiSaver investments. Its platform is designed to work across New Zealand KiwiSaver providers.

For White-Robinson, the proposition remains straightforward.

Make saving easier.

Automate it.

Allow small amounts to accumulate.

And give everyday spending a second purpose.

A few cents left over from a coffee or grocery shop may not look like an investment strategy. But repeated thousands of times — and given decades to compound — Feijoa is betting that small change today can become something considerably bigger tomorrow.

And with a place secured in the Startup World Cup New Zealand final, that very Kiwi idea is now getting a chance to prove itself on a much bigger stage.

#Feijoa #MarkWhiteRobinson #KiwiSaver #StartupWorldCup #StartupWorldCup2026 #Fintech #FintechNZ #StartupNZ #NewZealandStartups #KiwiInnovation #FinancialTechnology #Saving #Investing #RetirementSavings #FirstHome #FirstHomeBuyers #FinancialWellbeing #FinancialCapability #WealthBuilding #IntergenerationalWealth #Whanau #Tamariki #Mokopuna #MaoriEconomy #MaoriBusiness #OpenFinance #CreativeHQ #Innovation #Technology #BusinessNews #Aotearoa #MaoriNews #WaateaNews #RadioWaatea #WaateaDigital

The post #startup: Small Change, Big Ambition: KiwiSaver App Feijoa Earns Shot at Startup World Cup appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

Ka rerekē te āhua o tā te kaimahi whai i ngā utu hararei, i ngā utu māuiui hoki, nā te Ture hou o te Employment Leave Act.

Ka tatau te nui o te utu hararei ka whakawhiwhia ki te kaimahi mā ngā haora, kaua mā ngā rā.

Mō ngā kaimahi harangotengote, arā, ngā kaimahi ‘Part-time’, ka kore rātou e ahei ki te whai i te utu waatea ā-tau, arā, te annual leave. Heoi, ka nui ake tō rātou utu mā te 12.5%, he utu hai whakakapi i te wāhi ki te annual leave.

Neke atu i te 200,000 ngā kaimahi ka pāngia e ēnei panonitanga.

Hei tā Tēnā Tūiono, ki te tū te Rōpū Kākāriki hai kāwanatanga, ka whakakorehia e rātou tēnei Ture.

The post Teanau Tuiono | Ka rerekē ngā utu hararei mō ngā kaimahi. appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

I absolutely agree that we need to do far more to protect our tamariki and rangatahi online. But I hope NZ Labour does not simply buy into National’s proposed ban on social media accounts for under-16s. Labour says it has not yet decided whether it will support the legislation.

Australia should give us reason to be cautious. Its regulator says the policy has removed or restricted millions of accounts, but also acknowledges that a substantial number of under-16s still have accounts or are able to create new ones. In other words, young people do what young people have always done — they find ways around barriers.

We need something much more comprehensive than simply drawing an arbitrary line at 16.

We should be strengthening laws protecting children from adults who prey on them online, investing substantially more in education so young people, parents and schools can recognise grooming and other harmful behaviour, and putting much tougher obligations on technology companies around algorithms, addictive design and the content they push towards children.

Protecting young people online is absolutely the right objective. The question is whether banning them from social media is the right way to achieve it.

Let’s regulate the harm, hold the platforms and predators accountable, educate our rangatahi — and make sure whatever Parliament passes actually works.

The post #opinion: I HOPE LABOUR DOESN’T BUY INTO THE UNDER-16 SOCIAL MEDIA BAN appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

The future shape of local government is becoming a defining issue in the Bay of Plenty Regional Council by-election, with candidate Toi Iti campaigning for stronger local representation and warning that bigger councils could come at the cost of communities having a meaningful say over their own futures.

Iti is putting local decision-making, community representation and the potential consequences of council amalgamation at the centre of his campaign as debate continues across Aotearoa over whether combining councils could deliver efficiencies or simply move decision-making further away from the people affected by it.

For communities across the Bay of Plenty, the issue is particularly significant.

The region encompasses large urban centres, smaller towns, rural communities and numerous iwi and hapū, each with different priorities around infrastructure, rates, housing, environmental management and economic development.

Iti’s campaign raises a fundamental question: does making local government bigger necessarily make it better?

Supporters of amalgamation frequently point to potential savings through combining administrative functions, reducing duplication and coordinating major infrastructure across larger geographic areas.

But opponents argue those efficiencies can come with a democratic cost.

When councils become larger, individual communities can find themselves competing against bigger population centres for attention, investment and political representation.

For smaller and rural communities, there is a particular concern that decisions affecting their roads, water, environment and local development could increasingly be made by institutions physically and politically further removed from them.

Iti is campaigning on ensuring local communities retain the ability to influence those decisions.

The debate also has major implications for Māori.

Across the Bay of Plenty, local government decisions intersect directly with whenua, wai, coastal environments, resource management, infrastructure and relationships between councils and mana whenua.

For iwi and hapū, representation is therefore not simply about having another voice around a council table.

It is about whether people with whakapapa to an area have meaningful influence over decisions affecting their rohe.

Larger council structures could potentially create stronger regional coordination, but they could also change existing relationships between councils, Māori communities and local representatives.

That makes the detail of any amalgamation proposal critical.

There is also an economic argument voters will need to consider.

Combining councils is often promoted as a way of reducing costs, but structural reform itself can be expensive.

Technology systems need to be integrated.

Workforces and contracts need restructuring.

Debt and assets need to be reconciled.

Different rating systems may need to be combined.

And communities can have very different expectations about levels of service.

The question is therefore not simply whether amalgamation could eventually produce efficiencies, but who pays during the transition and whether promised savings ultimately reach ratepayers.

The Bay of Plenty Regional Council has responsibilities extending well beyond conventional perceptions of local government.

Regional councils make important decisions around freshwater, public transport, environmental protection, biosecurity, natural hazards and regional planning.

Those responsibilities become increasingly important as communities confront climate change, population growth and pressure on infrastructure and natural resources.

For Māori, they also overlap extensively with kaitiakitanga and the health of te taiao.

That means who sits around the regional council table — and how closely connected they are to the communities they represent — matters.

Iti’s campaign ultimately places a broader issue before voters.

Local government reform is frequently discussed through the language of efficiency, scale and cost.

But councils are also democratic institutions.

Their purpose is not simply to administer services as cheaply as possible. They provide communities with a mechanism for determining priorities and shaping the places where they live.

The challenge is finding a structure capable of delivering major infrastructure and regional planning efficiently without weakening local identity, accountability or representation.

For Toi Iti, the answer begins with ensuring communities retain a strong voice.

And as amalgamation increasingly enters political debate around the motu, the Bay of Plenty by-election could become another test of how voters feel about the prospect of bigger councils.

Because restructuring local government may change lines on an organisational chart — but for communities, the real question is whether those changes bring decision-making closer to them or push their voice further away.

#ToiIti #BayOfPlenty #BayOfPlentyRegionalCouncil #LocalGovernment #CouncilAmalgamation #Amalgamation #LocalDemocracy #LocalRepresentation #MaoriRepresentation #ManaWhenua #Iwi #Hapu #Whenua #Wai #TeTaiao #Kaitiakitanga #RegionalCouncil #LocalElections #ByElection #CommunityVoice #RegionalDevelopment #Infrastructure #Rates #Ratepayers #Democracy #BayOfPlentyNews #RegionalNews #MaoriNews #Aotearoa #WaateaNews #RadioWaatea #WaateaDigital

The post #regional: Local Voice or Bigger Councils? Toi Iti Puts Amalgamation at Centre of Bay of Plenty By-Election appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

Years of community advocacy have reached a major milestone in Raetihi, with the sod officially turned on the expansion of the Waimarino Health Centre — a development Te Mātuku says demonstrates what can happen when rural health services are designed around the voices and needs of local whānau.

Te Mātuku Chief Executive Elijah Pue says yesterday’s milestone represents far more than the beginning of construction.

It is the result of years of advocacy from a community determined to strengthen access to healthcare closer to home and ensure local people have a meaningful say in the services designed for them.

For rural communities such as Raetihi and the wider Waimarino, access to healthcare can be shaped by distance, workforce availability, transport and whether services are actually designed around the realities of the people using them.

The expansion represents an opportunity to address some of those barriers while strengthening the long-term health infrastructure available locally.

Central to Te Mātuku’s approach is the principle that communities should not simply be recipients of healthcare designed somewhere else.

Whānau need to be part of designing it.

Pue says keeping community voice at the centre has been fundamental to the journey towards the expanded health centre.

That approach is particularly important in rural Māori communities, where healthcare needs can intersect with geography, transport, affordability, cultural safety and longstanding inequities in access.

For whānau, being able to receive more care locally can mean fewer long journeys, reduced costs and greater continuity between patients and the people providing their healthcare.

The Waimarino development also highlights the wider challenge confronting rural healthcare across Aotearoa.

A health service may technically exist, but that does not necessarily mean it is equally accessible.

For people living outside major urban centres, attending an appointment can require significant travel and time away from work, kura or whānau responsibilities.

Those barriers become even greater for kaumātua, people living with disabilities and whānau without reliable transport.

Strengthening local health infrastructure therefore has consequences extending beyond the walls of a clinic.

It can determine whether people seek care early or wait until their condition becomes more serious.

The expansion also reflects a broader shift towards providing more healthcare within communities rather than relying exclusively on major hospitals and centralised services.

For Māori providers and community organisations, that approach aligns closely with Whānau Ora principles — understanding that health does not exist independently of housing, income, transport, whakapapa, whānau and the wider circumstances in which people live.

The opportunity is to create services that respond to the whole person rather than simply treating illness when somebody arrives at the door.

For Raetihi, years of kōrero and advocacy are now becoming something tangible.

The sod has been turned.

The next stage is construction and ultimately expanded services.

But the significance of the milestone is already clear.

When communities are given a genuine voice in determining what healthcare looks like, rural health investment becomes more than bricks and mortar — it becomes infrastructure designed around the whānau who will actually use it.

#WaimarinoHealthCentre #Waimarino #Raetihi #TeMatuku #ElijahPue #RuralHealth #RuralHealthcare #Hauora #HauoraMaori #MaoriHealth #Whanau #WhanauOra #WhanauVoice #CommunityHealth #HealthEquity #HealthInfrastructure #Kaumatua #RuralCommunities #HealthcareAccess #CommunityLed #HealthServices #CentralNorthIsland #Aotearoa #MaoriNews #HealthNews #RegionalNews #WaateaNews #RadioWaatea #WaateaDigital

The post #hauora: From Advocacy to Action: Waimarino Health Centre Expansion Puts Whānau Voice at the Heart of Rural Care appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

Fourteen years of negotiation, science, court proceedings and collaboration involving iwi, farmers, councils, industry and environmental groups has collided with the Coalition Government’s economic agenda, with implementation of Waikato Plan Change 1 now deferred until the end of 2032. For Resources Minister and New Zealand First deputy leader Shane Jones, the debate goes to the heart of a bigger political question — how far should environmental regulation go when the Government is determined to unlock regional and primary-sector growth?

The Government’s intervention in Plan Change 1 — PC1 has reignited debate over the future of the Waikato and Waipā rivers and whether years of collaborative environmental planning are being sidelined in the drive to reduce regulation on farmers and productive land.

PC1 was developed to reduce contaminants entering the Waikato and Waipā river systems and represents the first major regulatory step towards achieving Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato, the legally entrenched Vision and Strategy arising from Waikato River Treaty settlements.

In June, the Environment Court confirmed the plan after years of litigation, describing its measures as an essential first step towards restoring the awa. The long-term ambition is for people to once again be able to safely swim and gather food throughout the river system by 2096, with an interim goal of improving water quality by 20 percent.

But just months later, the Government has moved to defer key PC1 requirements until the end of 2032.

The Government argues the regulatory landscape has changed considerably since PC1 was first developed.

Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has questioned whether a plan developed more than a decade ago remains fit for purpose, following strong concerns from farmers about its complexity, compliance costs and effectiveness.

The Coalition is simultaneously rewriting the wider resource-management system.

Its Planning Bill and Natural Environment Bill are intended to replace the Resource Management Act with a system the Government says will be faster, clearer and cheaper while providing greater certainty for farming, infrastructure, housing and economic development.

That direction sits comfortably with Jones’ broader political agenda.

The Resources Minister has been an outspoken advocate for mining, forestry, fisheries, farming and regional economic development, arguing New Zealand cannot grow its economy while making productive activity increasingly difficult.

Jones has repeatedly promoted resource development as an important source of employment and wealth for regional communities and has also emphasised the importance of primary-sector activity to the Māori economy.

The other side of the argument is that PC1 was not created overnight by environmental campaigners sitting around a table.

It emerged from an extensive collaborative process involving Waikato-Tainui and other river iwi, Waikato Regional Council, farmers, primary-sector organisations, community representatives and environmental interests.

Waikato Regional Council says the plan was developed through a collaborative stakeholder group representing sector, industry and community interests.

The council has expressed disappointment that while the Government held discussions with a number of parties before announcing its intervention, the council’s advice or input was not sought.

That has created a significant political problem.

If governments ask communities, iwi, industry and councils to spend years negotiating difficult compromises, what happens to confidence in future collaborative processes when central government subsequently changes the rules?

The Waikato River Authority has been particularly critical of the decision.

It says deferring PC1 requirements until 2032 pushes restoration of the Waikato and Waipā further away and postpones requirements for Farm Environment Plans and associated measures designed to reduce contaminant losses.

The Authority is not arguing that farmers’ concerns should be ignored.

It has acknowledged legitimate issues around cost and complexity and supports finding practical ways of implementing the plan.

But it says solving those problems cannot come at the expense of the environmental outcomes required to restore the river.

That distinction is important.

The argument is not necessarily between people who care about farmers and people who care about rivers.

Many farmers have already invested heavily in fencing, planting, wetlands, nutrient management and other environmental improvements.

The dispute is increasingly about whether voluntary progress is sufficient or whether enforceable environmental bottom lines remain necessary.

The scale of the existing commitment is significant.

Since 2011, the Waikato River Authority has allocated more than $83.7 million across more than 500 restoration projects throughout the catchment.

That includes iwi-led projects, wetland restoration, riparian planting, habitat enhancement, water-quality initiatives and community programmes.

It represents years of investment based on an agreed destination: restoring the health and wellbeing of the awa.

The concern now is whether delaying the regulatory component of that work weakens the wider restoration effort.

There is also a Treaty dimension that cannot simply be removed through ordinary policy changes.

Te Ture Whaimana was established through Treaty settlement legislation and provides the primary direction for restoring and protecting the Waikato and Waipā rivers.

The Waikato River Authority is an independent co-governance institution made up of equal Crown and iwi representation and is responsible for overseeing that vision.

The Authority’s position is that governments may change planning legislation, regulations and implementation mechanisms, but the underlying Crown commitment to Te Ture Whaimana remains.

That means the question is not simply whether PC1 survives in its existing form.

It is whether whatever replaces or modifies it can still deliver the environmental improvements the Crown and iwi have already agreed are necessary.

For Shane Jones, there is another complexity.

The Māori economy has substantial interests in farming, forestry, fisheries, horticulture, energy and natural resources.

Jones argues those assets need the freedom to develop, generate income and create jobs.

But Māori economic interests also sit alongside whakapapa relationships with whenua and wai.

Waikato-Tainui’s relationship with the Waikato River is not simply environmental regulation.

The awa is central to identity, history, tikanga and the Treaty settlement framework itself.

That makes PC1 a particularly sharp example of the challenge facing Māori economic development: how to grow the value of whenua and primary-sector assets without passing the environmental cost to mokopuna.

The Government’s argument is that environmental regulation must be practical, affordable and compatible with productive economic activity.

The Waikato River Authority’s warning is that continuing to postpone difficult decisions simply transfers the problem to another generation.

Both farming and river restoration operate over long timeframes.

But polluted waterways do not stop deteriorating while governments rewrite legislation.

The Environment Court has already determined that action is necessary, while the Government believes the mechanism for delivering that action needs changing.

That leaves Shane Jones and the Coalition confronting a question considerably bigger than one Waikato planning document.

Can Aotearoa accelerate regional development and unleash its primary industries while still honouring environmental commitments negotiated with iwi and communities over more than a decade?

And after 14 years of negotiation, investment, science and litigation, another question is becoming increasingly difficult to avoid:

If everyone finally gets around the table, reaches a compromise and the courts confirm the way forward — what does it mean when the Government changes the pathway anyway?

#ShaneJones #NZFirst #PlanChange1 #PC1 #WaikatoRiver #WaipaRiver #TeAwaWaikato #WaikatoTainui #TeTureWhaimana #WaikatoRiverAuthority #Freshwater #WaterQuality #RiverRestoration #Whenua #Wai #TeTaiao #Kaitiakitanga #ManaWhenua #TeTiriti #TreatySettlement #CoGovernance #FarmingNZ #Farmers #PrimarySector #MaoriAgribusiness #MaoriEconomy #RegionalDevelopment #ResourceManagement #RMAReform #EnvironmentalProtection #EconomicGrowth #Election2026 #NZPolitics #Aotearoa #MaoriNews #WaateaNews #RadioWaatea #WaateaDigital

The post #regional: 14 Years of Work Put on Ice: Shane Jones Backs Growth as Waikato River Plan Faces 2032 Delay appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

More than 820 new social and affordable homes, millions of dollars flowing into community conservation, and progress on one of Aotearoa’s longest-running historic land grievances are among the Government initiatives being highlighted by Conservation Minister and Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka.

The Hamilton West MP is pointing to a broad programme of work spanning housing, conservation, biodiversity, iwi partnerships and Treaty redress, as the Government increasingly turns its attention towards delivery ahead of the 2026 election.

For Potaka, the announcements also intersect with issues of particular importance to Māori — access to housing, restoring te taiao, supporting kaitiakitanga and addressing historical Crown actions involving whenua.

Housing remains one of the most immediate challenges.

Potaka has been involved in announcements supporting the delivery of more than 820 new social and affordable homes, adding to efforts to increase supply for whānau struggling with housing costs and availability.

For Māori, housing remains an especially important measure of whether increased supply is reaching communities experiencing some of the greatest need.

The challenge is not simply constructing houses, but ensuring new developments translate into secure, affordable and appropriate homes in the places where whānau need them.

It also places attention on the role of Māori housing providers, iwi and community organisations capable of delivering housing alongside wider social and whānau support.

Potaka’s Conservation portfolio has also seen investment directed towards community-led environmental projects.

Rather than conservation being delivered solely through central government, grassroots organisations, iwi, hapū and local communities are increasingly central to restoration programmes involving native species, waterways, coastal habitats and biodiversity.

That approach has particular relevance for Māori, where conservation and kaitiakitanga are often inseparable.

Protecting an awa, ngahere or threatened species can also mean protecting whakapapa, mātauranga and the relationship between tangata whenua and te taiao.

Recent initiatives have included investment in habitat restoration and threatened species protection, alongside encouraging signs from conservation programmes working to restore some of Aotearoa’s most vulnerable native wildlife.

Alongside housing and conservation sits the Te Here-ā-Nuku — Nelson Tenths — settlement, addressing grievances whose origins stretch back generations.

The Nelson Tenths story has become one of the country’s most significant examples of the enduring consequences of Crown failures involving Māori land.

Advancing redress is therefore about considerably more than settling an historical account.

For affected whānau and descendants, it is about acknowledging what happened, addressing the consequences where possible and establishing a different relationship between the Crown and tangata whenua for the future.

The settlement also demonstrates why debates about whenua remain so central to Māori politics.

Decisions made generations ago continue to shape the economic and social position of whānau today.

Potaka’s two portfolios also expose one of the major tensions facing governments.

New Zealand needs more homes and infrastructure.

At the same time, it needs to protect biodiversity, restore degraded environments and prepare communities for climate and biosecurity threats.

Those priorities can sometimes collide.

The challenge is ensuring development does not simply transfer environmental costs to another generation.

For Māori communities, the question is also whether mana whenua and mātauranga Māori are meaningfully involved in decisions affecting whenua, wai and taonga species.

Community-led conservation provides one potential model — placing resources closer to those who understand and care for particular environments.

With the 2026 General Election approaching, announcements will increasingly be measured against outcomes.

How many of the promised houses have actually been completed?

Are they affordable for the whānau who need them?

Are conservation investments producing measurable improvements?

Are community organisations receiving enough support to sustain their mahi?

And does historic redress create meaningful opportunities for future generations?

Those are harder questions than announcing funding, but they are ultimately how government programmes are judged.

For Tama Potaka, the breadth of his portfolios means he sits across some of those tests directly.

Housing is about providing somewhere for whānau to stand. Conservation is about protecting the whenua beneath their feet. And historic redress is about confronting what happened when that whenua was taken or promises were not honoured.

As Election 2026 draws closer, the Government will be arguing that progress is being made across all three.

The question for communities will be whether they can see and feel that progress where they live.

#TamaPotaka #Housing #SocialHousing #AffordableHousing #MaoriHousing #Whanau #Conservation #TeTaiao #Kaitiakitanga #Whenua #Biodiversity #DOC #CommunityConservation #ManaWhenua #MataurangaMaori #TeHereANuku #NelsonTenths #TreatySettlement #TreatyRedress #TeTiriti #Iwi #Hapu #MaoriDevelopment #NationalParty #Government #Election2026 #NZElection2026 #MaoriPolitics #NZPolitics #Aotearoa #MaoriNews #HousingNews #ConservationNews #WaateaNews #RadioWaatea #WaateaDigital

The post #national: From Homes to Whenua: Tama Potaka Points to Delivery Across Housing, Conservation and Historic Redress appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

Tākuta Ferris is preparing for one of the biggest tests of his political career, confirming he will seek re-election in Te Tai Tonga in 2026 as an independent after entering Parliament under the Te Pāti Māori banner in 2023 and being expelled from the party in 2025.

The contest for Te Tai Tonga has taken another significant turn, with sitting MP Tākuta Ferris announcing he will attempt to retain the vast Māori electorate without the backing of a political party.

Ferris won Te Tai Tonga for Te Pāti Māori at the 2023 General Election, defeating Labour incumbent Rino Tirikatene and helping deliver a major resurgence for Te Pāti Māori across the Māori electorates.

But the political landscape has changed dramatically since then.

Following a bitter internal dispute, Ferris was expelled from Te Pāti Māori in 2025 and has since continued in Parliament as an independent MP.

Now he is asking the voters of Te Tai Tonga to send him back.

Standing as an independent fundamentally changes the electoral equation for Ferris.

There is no party list to fall back on.

His path back to Parliament depends on winning the electorate outright.

That makes his personal support among voters, whānau, hapū and communities throughout Te Tai Tonga critical to his campaign.

It will also provide a fascinating test of how much of Ferris’ 2023 victory belonged to the Te Pāti Māori movement and how much belonged to Ferris himself.

In 2023 those two forces were aligned.

In 2026 they will not be.

Te Tai Tonga is geographically enormous, stretching across Te Waipounamu and including Rakiura, Wharekauri and parts of Te Whanganui-a-Tara.

Campaigning effectively across such a large electorate is challenging even with the machinery and resources of a political party.

For an independent candidate, organisation on the ground will be particularly important.

Ferris will need volunteers, fundraising, communications capability and local networks capable of competing against candidates supported by established political parties.

But incumbency also gives him an advantage.

He enters the campaign as the sitting MP with three years of parliamentary visibility and an opportunity to argue that his mandate ultimately comes from the people of Te Tai Tonga rather than any political organisation.

The election will not simply test Ferris.

It presents a significant challenge for Te Pāti Māori.

The party now needs to demonstrate it can retain an electorate won in 2023 while campaigning against the MP who delivered that victory.

That creates an unusual political dynamic.

The campaign will inevitably raise questions about the internal turmoil that resulted in Ferris’ departure, but voters will also be asked to make a more fundamental choice about representation.

Do they want a representative operating independently of party discipline?

Or does Te Tai Tonga’s political influence depend on having an MP sitting within a larger parliamentary caucus?

Ferris’ candidacy also complicates the wider battle for the Māori electorates.

Te Pāti Māori’s extraordinary success in 2023 was built around electorate victories and a powerful message of independent Māori political representation.

The party is now heading into Election 2026 defending those gains while also navigating the consequences of internal division.

Labour, meanwhile, will see Te Tai Tonga as an opportunity to rebuild its historic strength across the Māori seats.

An independent incumbent potentially fragments that contest further.

That means Te Tai Tonga could become one of the electorates to watch closely on election night.

For Ferris, the calculation is straightforward even if the campaign will not be.

He won the electorate once.

Now he intends to ask Te Tai Tonga to elect him again — this time on his own name and record.

The result will answer a question extending beyond one politician.

Can an independent Māori electorate MP build enough personal support to overcome the organisational power of the political parties?

Election 2026 will provide the answer.

For Tākuta Ferris there is no list, no party machinery and no second route back to Parliament.

The pathway has changed — and this time Te Tai Tonga itself will decide whether his political journey continues.

#TakutaFerris #TeTaiTonga #Election2026 #NZElection2026 #IndependentMP #IndependentCandidate #TePatiMaori #MaoriPolitics #MaoriElectorates #MaoriVote #Vote2026 #TeWaipounamu #Wharekauri #Rakiura #ManaMotuhake #TinoRangatiratanga #Parliament #NZPolitics #Aotearoa #MaoriNews #PoliticalNews #ElectionNews #WaateaNews #RadioWaatea #WaateaDigital

The post #election2026: Tākuta Ferris Bets His Political Future on Te Tai Tonga as an Independent appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

For decades, former sawmill workers and their whānau have carried the consequences of exposure to one of the darkest chapters in New Zealand’s industrial history. Now Sawmill Workers Against Poisons says a new Human Rights Commission report must finally lead to healthcare, redress and accountability — not another generation of waiting.

**Marama Cook, co-chair of Sawmill Workers Against Poisons — SWAP — is renewing the organisation’s call for meaningful government action following findings by Te Kāhui Tika Tangata Human Rights Commission examining the legacy of pentachlorophenol, or PCP, and the dioxins associated with its use in New Zealand’s timber industry.

For SWAP, the issue is deeply personal.

The organisation represents former sawmill workers and whānau who believe they have lived with serious and, in some cases, intergenerational consequences after workers were exposed to toxic timber-treatment chemicals.

Their campaign has stretched across decades and generations, seeking recognition, appropriate healthcare, compensation and redress, environmental remediation and accountability for what happened.

PCP was widely used in New Zealand’s timber-processing industry as an anti-sapstain treatment.

Concerns about its toxicity were not new even during the period it was being used. Historical reporting shows international studies had identified serious toxicity risks decades earlier, while PCP continued to be widely used in New Zealand until the timber industry withdrew it in 1988.

The contamination did not necessarily remain inside the mills.

Former industrial sites, surrounding soil, waterways and sediments were also affected.

The scale of the environmental legacy was significant enough that a Ministry for the Environment report in the early 1990s estimated there were around 450 PCP-contaminated sites around New Zealand.

In the Bay of Plenty, the Kopeopeo Canal became one of the clearest examples. Dioxin contamination was linked to historical discharges from a former sawmill where PCP had been used to treat timber, eventually resulting in a multimillion-dollar remediation programme.

But while contaminated whenua and waterways eventually attracted remediation programmes, workers have spent decades asking whether the same determination would be applied to them.

Historical estimates suggested thousands of timber workers may have been exposed nationwide, with a significant concentration in the central North Island.

Former workers have previously described developing illnesses after years of working around the chemicals, sometimes without understanding the potential dangers they faced.

SWAP has helped keep those stories alive.

The organisation has fought to ensure the debate does not become solely about contaminated industrial land while overlooking the people who worked on that land, handled those chemicals and took contaminated clothing back into their homes and whānau.

The latest intervention from the Human Rights Commission puts that unresolved history firmly back on the national agenda.

The Commission has called for meaningful action on the toxic legacy of PCP and its dioxins, framing the issue not simply as an historical occupational health failure but as an ongoing human rights concern.

That distinction matters.

If people continue to experience consequences from historic exposure, then the issue cannot simply be filed away as something that happened in the timber industry decades ago.

For SWAP, recognition must now be translated into practical action.

That means ensuring affected workers and whānau can access appropriate healthcare and monitoring, examining pathways for compensation and redress, continuing environmental clean-up and establishing accountability for the failures that allowed exposure to occur.

There is also an important Māori dimension to the story.

Forestry and timber processing have long provided employment for Māori communities throughout regions including Rotorua, Whakatāne and the wider central North Island.

For generations, mill work put food on the table and provided employment in communities where opportunities could otherwise be limited.

But that also meant Māori workers and their whānau were among those potentially exposed to the chemicals used inside those workplaces.

The consequences therefore reach beyond occupational health.

They raise questions about hauora, environmental justice, whenua, intergenerational wellbeing and whether communities were adequately informed and protected from industrial risks.

New Zealand has demonstrated that it can act when contaminated environments require remediation.

Millions of dollars have been spent cleaning up former industrial sites and contaminated waterways.

SWAP’s argument after decades of advocacy is that human beings deserve the same determination.

Because environmental remediation addresses only one part of the legacy.

The workers cannot be excavated and replaced.

Whānau cannot rewind decades of illness, uncertainty or loss.

And communities cannot undo exposure that has already happened.

The Human Rights Commission’s intervention creates another opportunity for the Crown to confront an issue that campaigners say has remained unresolved for far too long.

For Marama Cook and SWAP, the question now is whether this report becomes another document acknowledging historical harm — or finally becomes the catalyst for action.

After decades of campaigning, the demands remain remarkably consistent: recognition, healthcare, redress, environmental restoration and accountability.

The workers helped build New Zealand’s timber industry.

Many spent their working lives handling products they believed were part of doing an ordinary day’s work.

Now, decades later, their whānau are asking whether the country that benefited from that labour is finally prepared to confront the consequences.

The contamination may have begun generations ago. The fight for justice is happening now.

#SawmillWorkersAgainstPoisons #SWAP #MaramaCook #PCP #Pentachlorophenol #Dioxins #ToxicExposure #SawmillWorkers #TimberWorkers #WorkerHealth #WorkersRights #OccupationalHealth #HumanRightsCommission #TeKahuiTikaTangata #EnvironmentalJustice #EnvironmentalHealth #HauoraMaori #Whanau #MaoriHealth #IntergenerationalHealth #Rotorua #Whakatane #BayOfPlenty #KopeopeoCanal #Forestry #TimberIndustry #WorkplaceSafety #WorkSafe #Compensation #Redress #Accountability #EnvironmentalCleanup #TeTaiao #Aotearoa #MaoriNews #WaateaNews #RadioWaatea #WaateaDigital

The post #mahi: Poisoned at Work, Waiting for Justice: Sawmill Whānau Demand Action on New Zealand’s Toxic PCP Legacy appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.

Kua riro mā Paul Goldsmith ngā kōpaki 11 e whakahaere whai muri i te whatinga atu o Chris Penk.

He nui ngā mahi me ngā kawenga kei roto i ia kōpaki.

Ko ngā kōpaki kei a Goldsmith:

E ai ki a Teanau Tuiono o te Rōpū Kākāriki, kāore e taea e te tangata kotahi te āta aromātāwai, te āta whanake i ngā kōpaki nei nā te nui o ngā haepapa o ia kōpaki.

Hei tāna anō, he tohu anō tēnei mō te pōrearea o te Kāwanatanga.

The post Teanau Tuiono | He nui rawa te 11 kōpaki mā te Minita kotahi? appeared first on Waatea News: Māori Radio Station.