I think every gun nut has been in a debate with a anti-gunner about the true intention of the Second Amendment at least once but more than likely, many times. While arguing the purpose of the Second Amendment, many anti-gunners will eventually say that if your argument is true, then that means we should all have the right to be armed with nukes. This is a informal fallacy where a debater exaggerates an opponent's position to such an extent as to replace it with a position that was not originally argued by the opponent.  If someone spews out this ignorance during a debate then first of all, you know you are winning but second, why not dig the knife in a little deeper with a logical answer, drop the mic and walk away?

Today's episode helps to arm our listeners with such an answer. Enjoy!

Show-notes can be found at Wastedammo.com/71