Do you ever get into political debates and notice how each side seems to have legitimate studies that support their opinions? How can all these studies be contradicting each other?  Can any study or data for a study be molded to fit anyone's agenda? It's a problem because activists use these studies in court cases and in political debates to claim that civilians rarely use guns to stop public shootings. Enjoy!

Show-notes can be found at Wastedammo.com/222