Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]
https://nebula.wsimg.com/1a147a47140f47f7911fbb4e928fc905?AccessKeyId=C0F879B9BB56750BC6EE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAYnJpZBExQmNkMWR3dTNoZmN4ejdzdHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR5BqOcAPZvZH6QtHbnDyjzgrZKCKE5ii_8xOoks6MiMd0v64TEv5QwyYsxIng_aem_Qi2ZqfKIGHCYKQYE9X6kvg
WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]
murfai-en_UK-female:
OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FIGU CANADA NATIONAL GROUP / FLCA #43 / November 2025
PaplaMedia-Noah Greer:
WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED???
Translation: DeepL / Translation corrections, intro, summary notes by Catherine Mossman / Tiny, ON / November 17, 2025
img:Screenshot 2025-12-03 162229.png
MiniMax-English_UpsetGirl:
What actually determines a civilised society? In the west we define it in material terms, i.e by the degree to which we obtain
and secure material riches, avail ourselves of technologies, live in somewhat ‘stable’ societies where most people are ‘civil’,
i.e., polite, helpful and get along ok. But if these ‘stable’ societies start to collapse we soon see more basic survival instincts
kick in and generally it’s ‘everyone for themselves’ with any pretence of so-called civil behaviour quickly deteriorating. There
are always exceptions, and there are those who can bring people together in difficult times. Perhaps these are some of the
more ‘civilised’ ones, even though they could be living in poverty and utter desolation. In that case, perhaps we can define
‘being civilised’ more in terms of non-material values… let’s see what Billy and Ptaah discuss in the excerpt below.
In this conversation (Contact Report 592) that Billy had with Ptaah on July 7, 2012, they examine this subject and provide us
with interesting insights.
How we think of civilisation has nothing to do with the true meaning of civilisation.
View all episodes
By https://nebula.wsimg.com/1a147a47140f47f7911fbb4e928fc905?AccessKeyId=C0F879B9BB56750BC6EE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAYnJpZBExQmNkMWR3dTNoZmN4ejdzdHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR5BqOcAPZvZH6QtHbnDyjzgrZKCKE5ii_8xOoks6MiMd0v64TEv5QwyYsxIng_aem_Qi2ZqfKIGHCYKQYE9X6kvg
WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]
murfai-en_UK-female:
OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FIGU CANADA NATIONAL GROUP / FLCA #43 / November 2025
PaplaMedia-Noah Greer:
WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED???
Translation: DeepL / Translation corrections, intro, summary notes by Catherine Mossman / Tiny, ON / November 17, 2025
img:Screenshot 2025-12-03 162229.png
MiniMax-English_UpsetGirl:
What actually determines a civilised society? In the west we define it in material terms, i.e by the degree to which we obtain
and secure material riches, avail ourselves of technologies, live in somewhat ‘stable’ societies where most people are ‘civil’,
i.e., polite, helpful and get along ok. But if these ‘stable’ societies start to collapse we soon see more basic survival instincts
kick in and generally it’s ‘everyone for themselves’ with any pretence of so-called civil behaviour quickly deteriorating. There
are always exceptions, and there are those who can bring people together in difficult times. Perhaps these are some of the
more ‘civilised’ ones, even though they could be living in poverty and utter desolation. In that case, perhaps we can define
‘being civilised’ more in terms of non-material values… let’s see what Billy and Ptaah discuss in the excerpt below.
In this conversation (Contact Report 592) that Billy had with Ptaah on July 7, 2012, they examine this subject and provide us
with interesting insights.
How we think of civilisation has nothing to do with the true meaning of civilisation.