Copyright law also sucks. But the big issue with DRM that people talk about is the fact that it's proprietary software. If the software were Free/Libre the software can be modified such that it now respects the user's freedom where it once might not have. You the user have control with Free/Libre Software. So there is no need to return to physical media, because physical media sucks. And we have superior technology now, it's just a matter of do we have the right to use it. Or are our rights denied. If we have the rights we control our computers. The computer systems are superior, hard drives on computers can be terabytes and terabytes in size, whereas a pesky CD or a DVD or even a blueray are at the very most measured in gigabytes for one, but the even more important reason by far is the fact that physical media degrades. Even if computer parts like hard drives do also degrade, digital files are much easier to copy, to move on to another fresh media, and also to backup, than physical media is. There is really no reason to go back to physical media so long as we can achieve Software Freedom, which should be the real priority.

Free/Libre software is software that respects the user's freedom. Software that meets the "four essential freedoms" is considered Free/Libre. The Free Software Movement was started by Richard Stallman to to pursue the liberation of cyberspace, to create a free digital world for computers users.
Richard Stallman started the GNU project to develop an operating system for this, and pioneered the concept of copyleft with their GNU GPL license. Copyleft is a specific kind of a Free/Libre license among many, that guarantees that the user's freedom is preserved when the software exchanges hands. The four freedoms of software are: (0) to run the program, (1) to study and change the program in source code form, (2) to redistribute exact copies, and (3) to distribute modified versions.
Visit GNU.org for more https://www.gnu.org


file details
FLAC audio
s16 mono 48000hz