Wealth Formula

Wealth Formula

By Buck JoffreyBusinessInvesting
Download on the App Store

Wealth Formula episodes

  • 168: Multidimensional Investing with Tom Wheelwright!
    Learning is an electrical function of the brain. When we first start learning something, our brains start developing connections to integrate that information. Over a period of time, those electrical connections become stronger and stronger giving the perception of something becoming second nature.
    It isn’t until a basic function becomes second nature that you can then start adding layers. For example, a professional baseball player was, at one point, an infant who couldn’t walk. Eventually he went on to develop his athletic prowess to the point where he might even chew tobacco while hitting a hundred mile an hour baseball with a piece of wood. At that point, he doesn’t have to think about how to walk anymore.
    You see, expertise in things requires depth of experience that allows for complex neural circuitry to form and to make certain, more basic skills, run on autopilot. At that point, you are able to absorb information in multiple dimensions—some conscious and some not. This next level in learning allows us to function at a higher level.
    So how does this relate to investing? Well, becoming a sophisticated investor requires some of the same layering of information and development of neural circuitry to allow for a more comprehensive approach to personal finance.
    I’ve talked before about how novice investors are often attracted to the “good from far but far from good” investments. You know—the kind with big front end cash on cash returns that then depreciate to zero in just a few years.
    Seems obvious to avoid such things but cash on cash is a simple thing to cling on to for novice alternative investors after reading books like Kiyosaki’s Rich Dad Poor Dad. It represents the metaphorical “learning to walk”. Over time, the successful investor starts layering depth and complexity to his investing strategy. He might even start paying attention to the more nuanced lessons in the Kiyosaki books that are often overlooked at first glance.
    I will admit whole heartedly that there was a time several years ago that I was just “learning to walk”. There is no shame in that. Over time, I just spent so much time thinking about this stuff that I got more sophisticated than most when it comes to thinking about money. That said, I’ve been around for a long enough time to know that five years from now I’ll be a hell of a lot smarter than I currently am!
    Now, over the last several years, one of the most critical elements of investing that I have learned is to understand the importance of the interplay between deploying capital and taxes. In fact, I would say that taxes play a DOMINANT role in my investing decisions and, for that matter, my life decisions.
    Earlier, I mentioned that the tax code has not only influenced my investing decisions but actually some life decisions as well. You see, after I left medicine, I had to decide where to focus my time. I was already investing in real estate and enjoyed it so one of my options was to become a full time real estate professional.
    A real estate professional, defined by the IRS, requires a minimum of 750 hours documented real estate activity per year with no other activity that you spend more time doing. If you meet those criteria, the tax benefits are HUGE. Specifically, all of those passive losses you get from investing in real estate become “activated” making them applicable to any other source of income that you or your spouse (if filing jointly), may earn in a given year. If you don’t understand what I just said, read this paragraph again. It’s huge and it was one of the major reasons that I decided that the best option for me was to become a full time real estate professional.
    Say you were one of the lucky ones and sold your dental practice for $10 million. What if you then decided to focus the rest of the year on going full time into real estate investing and became designated as a real estate professional? Well, all of that money gained from the liquidity event could theoretically be
    48 min
  • 167: Are You Ready for an Asset Protection Knife-Fight?
    If you can’t explain it, you don’t understand it. Remember that the next time you look across the table at a financial advisor type and feel confused. Ask yourself if you could explain what you were just told to someone else with some level of confidence.
    If not, start asking questions because the advisor will not expect you to! You see, this is a set-up—a financial ambush so to speak that high paid professionals get caught up in all the time.
    Let’s say you are a hotshot surgeon coming out of residency and you just signed a contract that’s going to pay you $500K per year.
    You know nothing about about investing, taxes, or asset protection and suddenly, you have a bunch of new “best friends” who want to help you invest that money and do your taxes.
    The money manager starts talking about all these buckets and different kinds of risk and yield. He seems to know what he’s talking about but you don’t really get it.
    Even though you don’t know how those different buckets produce the returns the way the guy said they would, you figure he knows what he’s talking about. After all, he manages money for all the other guys in the practice.
    Instead of asking a lot of questions that might sound dumb, you decide to just to trust him and give him all your money. After all, like you, he is a “specialist”. Let him do his job!
    Now, as a Wealth Formula Podcast listener this scenario may sound ridiculous to you, but I can guarantee it happens every year when surgical residents graduate and start making money.
    Even surgeons with massive egos are fooled into thinking that personal finance is too complicated for them and should be handled by a professional. After all, we have all been brainwashed into believing that by Wall Street. They want you to be afraid. They want you to think that what they do is so complex that you would be down-right irresponsible to take things into your own hands.
    It’s actually a brilliant marketing play if you think about it. The idea is to weaponize complexity to generate fear. The highly educated, highly paid professional falls for it all the time! Do me a favor, next time you are in a situation like this with a money manager, tax professional or asset protection attorney, start asking them all the questions you can think of even if they seem stupid. After all, if they can’t explain it, they either don’t understand it or they are simply trying to make you feel dumb.
    None of this stuff is over your head. Furthermore, if you think you are too busy to learn about your own financial matters, you will pay a steep price that you won’t discover until the end of your career when you look at your bank accounts and start wondering why you don’t have more money. I see this all the time with doctors and other highly specialized professionals and its sad—people making hundreds of thousands of dollars per year for decades and winding up with less than a million bucks to retire!
    I am sympathetic though. The fear of complexity is powerful. I have to admit that I have followed the lead blindly into some things as well. A few years ago, I signed up for a foreign asset protection trust because it seemed like a good idea—and for me it was.
    The problem was that I didn’t really understand the strategy very well. But the guy who recommended it to me seemed like he knew what he was talking about and was very confident that it was the right thing for me.
    And to be clear, he is a smart guy. But I always left meetings with him a little confused and frankly embarrassed to ask any more questions. I figured he knew what he was talking about and that he was taking care of me.
    When it comes to asset protection, that’s pretty dangerous. After all, when push comes to shove, you have to know exactly what your situation is. There is no time to be confused in a knife fight!
    For better or for worse, I was in some asset protection knife fights over the past year after a business failure. Everything turned out ok but I found significant flaws in t
    1 hr 4 min
  • 166: Should You Invest in Assisted Living Facilities?
    Let me tell you about another one of my failures. A few years ago, I was listening to a well known podcast and I heard about this concept of turning single family houses into elderly care facilities.
    The idea sounded pretty compelling so I decided to go to the “course” in Phoenix. In fact, I went out there with another entrepreneur buddy of mine.
    In short, we both got sold on the concept (and I mean sold). The next thing you know, we were dropping five figures on a coaching/mentorship program.
    Have you ever bought something like this? I bet you have if you think about it. Good marketers know that people respond to fear and greed and this one had elements of both.
    Now I am not saying that this program that I signed up for was worthless. I did learn a lot and I believe that had things gone another way, I could have had a successful small business on my hands.
    However, a lot of things got in the way. First of all, I bought a house that was clearly zoned for such conversion, but it was clear that the neighbors were not going to have it.
    But wait..if you are zoned properly, shouldn’t you be able to do whatever you want to do? Not really—that’s where the theoretical and the real world of local real estate politics collide.
    In short, the neighbors were making me jump through all sorts of hoops that they knew would be time consuming and expensive. The proposed traffic feasibility study alone would have cost me tens of thousand of dollars.
    In the end, I asked my business attorney if the neighbors could really stop me and he said, “no, but they can make you wish you had never started”.
    If you want to know how this thing ended ask me next time you see me. But suffice it to say, this did not end up the way I wanted it to. When all was said and done, I was down over $250K with nothing to show for it.
    Now, I don’t blame my coach/mentor for this. The service provided was reasonable and had circumstances been different, I might have had a profitable little business.
    But there was a valuable lesson there. No matter how you cut it, what I was embarking on was an extremely high risk endeavor. I was doing something that really had not been done before in the Chicago suburbs. It involved significant investment into real estate and there were an enormous number of moving parts—many of which were out of my control.
    For a guy with some highly profitable businesses at the time, did it make sense for me to take this on? In retrospect the answer was clearly no. Even had things turned out ok, the reward simply was not high enough for the risk involved.
    Understand that I am a serial entrepreneur. I have successfully started multiple businesses with seven and eight figure yearly revenues. But I have also failed on some. That’s why, when it comes to my entrepreneurial activity, I never accept investor money. I am willing to take a lot of risk on my own dime but I’m leaving you out!
    So, losing money in that venture was not that big of a deal to me. I’ve lost a lot more than that with other efforts. But what bothered me about this one was that the upside was so limited. Why did I think it was worth it? Well, I think I had mistook a business start up for a real estate investment.
    When you hear about 30 percent cash on cash projects, that sounds pretty good to a real estate investor but it’s not that big of a deal for a business start up. You should expect that kind of return from buying an established business. But for a start-up??? No. That’s enough.
    For reference, my successful startups have had returns in the 400-500 percent range and have been incredibly scalable. That makes up for the big losers. The best case scenario for this start-up was 30 percent cash on cash, lack of scalability, and a ton of work and responsibility (it’s a big deal taking care of the elderly!)
    Bottom line, I chalk this experience up as a mistake. Now, don’t get me wrong. I know there have been people doing this successfully but those who are doing it well are not t
    54 min
  • 165: Gray Hair, Peacocks and Unicornomics
    We recently had a Wealth Formula Network call in which we talked about an offering some members were participating in that I didn’t care for as much. One thing to remember is that smart people can disagree about things without anyone necessarily being wrong. I pointed out some things I avoid when I invest and the topic seemed to garner a lot of interest. So, I decided to share some of the lessons I have learned over the years. After all, the best way to become a good investor is through age and experience.
    The problem is that age and experience are hard to teach. When I did my first face lift, I thought I was good. But looking back after doing 500, I definitely was not. I had the basics down and got lucky with my results, but it was no where near mastery.
    When you are a young Turk plowing ahead full of energy, you look at guys a few years older and wonder why they are so cautious until, one day, you learn for yourself—the hard way. When you make a mistake that matters it will stick for ever.
    The good news is that while mistakes are critical to learning, they don’t always have to be your mistakes. But in order to learn from others mistakes, you have to be humble and receptive. So, let me give you a few investing pearls that have come along with my graying hair.
    1) When it comes to investing, it’s not just about the numbers. It is also an over-simplication to say to “invest with people that you know, like and trust.” Of course I truly believe that is a requirement. The problem is that I know, like and trust a lot of people with whom I would never trust my money. Would you trust your grandmother to choose where to invest your life savings?
    Look for people who you know, like and trust, then judge their competence by looking at what they have already achieved. A track record is important and really is the report card that you need to look at. Don’t be part of someone’s resume building exercise or someone’s multimillion dollar lesson if possible. If someone has a full time job as a software engineer and trying to get you to invest in their $20 million dollar real estate acquisition so they can work toward quitting their job, politely decline and say you might be interested in 5-10 years.
    2) Avoid “good from far but far from good investments”. Every species has some kind of physical attribute that make it more likely to reproduce. Think of the peacock with colorful patterned plumage fanned out for display purposes to attract a mate. Investments have similar qualities that are irresistible to investors and deal sponsors know it. Cash-on-cash is probably one of the most attractive features to the novice investor because, on the surface, high cash on cash numbers can be pretty seductive. Everyone loves the idea of replacing their income with passive cash flow asap.
    Let me ask you this—would you rather get 25 percent cash on cash or 7 percent cash on cash? 25 of course, right? Well, what if the 25 percent depreciated down to zero in 4 years while the 7 percent cash-on-cash investment increased in value by 100 percent?
    All investment proformas must be considered holistically. As investors, we should be looking at the profit we make from our investments rather than being content with monthly checks that represent our own money being given back to us in small increments. I would suggest looking at investments in terms of annualized returns or internal rate of return instead. In the process of making this calculation, you will need to get an idea of how the investment will be exited. In some cases, you may discover that there is NO EXIT! No exit is not a good thing—tough to get a return of any kind on that.
    Anyway, I could keep going—in Wealth Formula Network we recently talked about the classic great deal that is highly dependent on one guy—that’s another recipe for disaster. There are lots of patterns of bad investments that you recognize after you’ve been around the block a few times—sort of like PTSD.
    In fact, I would go as far
    56 min
  • 164: Should You Invest in Marijuana?
    Last week, I got a few emails wondering why I was sending out “scammy” emails from my friend Teeka Tiwari about investing in pot. Actually, I totally understand. If you don’t know Teeka, those emails might sound a little bit like snake oil advertisements.
    As you know, I pride myself on not being a platform for internet marketers or for people raising capital that have no clue what they are doing. Early in my podcasting days, I was less careful about who I interviewed. I was more interested in the idea of exposure to broader alternative investment opportunities without necessarily advocating for anything.
    As a podcaster, I thought that I was just providing education and that people would understand that and not jump to the conclusion that I was supporting a particular investment. The problem is that once you get behind the mic, whether you like it or not, you end up being a bit of an influencer. So, you have to be careful who and what you expose to your audience.
    You see, there is a lot of noise out there and most of it is worthless. The challenge is to figure out who to take seriously. In my own experience, you cannot draw a direct correlation between marketing efforts and value.
    In other words, there are individuals who market heavily who actually are worth listening to. Robert Kiyosaki is a good example. He is a master marketer. He is so good at marketing that you don’t even know that you are on the receiving end of it when you are. I recognize that. I also recognize that Robert’s books and philosophy have fundamentally changed my life and the life of hundreds of thousands of other people.
    Newsletters are particularly difficult to assess. The very business model of a newsletter is to sell newsletters. But if you can’t make any money selling newsletters who is going to actually write them? How do you get more people to buy them? The answer is that you have to advertise.
    Now, does that mean that a newsletter is not valuable because it is being advertised heavily? In my opinion, the answer is no. There are some really smart people writing newsletters with tremendous value who market like crazy. Marin Katusa and Doug Casey are just a couple of examples.
    One of my favorite newsletters is Palm Beach Confidential written by Teeka Tiwari. The focus is cryptocurrency. I have been a subscriber to it for two years and, although the cryptocurrency market has been frozen for some time, I have really learned to appreciate how much time and thought Teeka puts into his work and his approach to speculative investments. I don’t agree with everything he says or recommends, but he works his tail off and is one of my primary sources for cryptocurrency news and information.
    That’s why you have been getting emails from me about Teeka’s latest venture into the cannabis space. Teeka works under the umbrella of a marketing machine called the Palm Beach Research Group. I don’t have an opinion on most of what they do because I am only concerned with individuals that provide the underlying content of a given newsletter.
    When I found out that Teeka had focussed on the cannabis space, I was happy to support him. A lot of people in Wealth Formula Nation, including myself, have been trying to figure out how to get exposure to cannabis investing while avoiding all the shady characters. That’s a tough job. But that’s the focus of Teeka’s latest venture and, if anyone can do it well, I think Teeka can.
    Check out this week’s Wealth Formula Podcast as I interview Teeka on the topic of cannabis investing and you will get a sense for why I decided to support him.
    43 min
  • 163: When Bad Debt Happens to Good People with Jorge Newberry
    Debt is like a lethal weapon. It can be used for good and it can be used for greed. It can be used to create wealth and it can be used to destroy it.
    In short, debt is nothing more than a tool. The problem is that a fool with a tool is still a fool. Debt gets a bad name because of this.
    But the reality is that, in skilled hands, debt can be used to create unlimited wealth. In Investor Club, we use debt to create the extraordinary strategy of infinite returns. We also use it in Wealth Formula Banking and Velocity Plus. Debt is the weapon of the wealthy.
    Unfortunately, it is also the opioid of the poor who often use it to pay their bills. In situations like that, debt can be downright deadly.
    That said, like a loaded gun with good intentions, sometimes debt can explode at unexpected times and create unexpected casualties. That’s why it is always important to respect it and fear it… just a little bit—like driving a motorcycle. If you don’t, it will take you out in a flash.
    Many smart entrepreneurs have experienced this first hand and gone through the painful process of dealing with the repercussion of good debt gone bad.
    Jorge Newbery is one of those guys. He is a serial entrepreneur and, using debt, was worth millions of dollars as a real estate entrepreneur. Then it suddenly went south—literally an act of nature took down his empire.
    A lesser entrepreneur would have been wiped out for good. Not Jorge. Not only did he overcome the debt, but he built an entire career based on it. And he’s got fantastic insight on how to deal with it now.
    Debt is a big part of getting rich. Learning about it is a key to becoming wealthy. That’s why you should listen to this interview with Jorge Newbery now.
    49 min
  • 162: Are We Seeing the Extinction of Fossil Fuels?
    These days you hear a lot of people use the word “sustainable”. It’s actually one of those words that I don’t really understand very well. I guess by definition, it means something that you can keep on doing in perpetuity—something you can recycle and use over and over again.
    In that regard, the kind of investing I advocate for is “sustainable investing”. Those of you in investor club know that one of the primary strategies I look for is called “Infinite Returns”. The idea is to shoot for not 8 percent or 10 percent cash on cash, but instead, we want all of our invested capital back in our hands in 4-5 years while maintaining equity, cash flow, and eventually the benefit of capital gains. Meanwhile, we use the money pulled out of that first deal and recycle it into the next. It sure is a lot easier than just making more money.
    Anyway, the problem with the word “sustainable” is that it sometimes gets a bad rap from us capitalist types. It’s a word that has some loaded connotations with imagery of hippy socialists trying to tax us into carbon submission. That’s why I don’t think I will ever use the phrase “sustainable investing” when describing my own strategies, although it sure seems appropriate.
    Imagery aside, there appears to be a growing capitalist case for renewable energies that just might not be easy to ignore over the next few years. Just like computers doubling their power every couple of years, it seems like Moore’s law is starting to apply to alternative energy sources as well.
    In other words, in the next decade, you might see a massive shift in energy resources not because people worry about the climate impact of fossil fuels (which I do), but rather because it is so much cheaper to use the alternatives. It’s just the way capitalism works.
    I’ve heard multiple smart individuals talk about this in the past year and I think its worth actually thinking about critically as an investor. So, I thought it might be a good idea to have someone on the show who can intelligently speak on the topic. Hunter Lovins certainly can do that and she is my guest on this week’s episode of Wealth Formula Podcast.
    44 min
  • 161: Opportunity Zones: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
    We’ve had a number of webinars and podcasts related to tax mitigation over the last several weeks. Unless you are new to the Wealth Formula ecosystem, you know that when we think about investing, we think not only about how much we are going to make, but also what we are going to keep.
    For those of you in the accredited investor club, we’ve talked about the power of utilizing bonus depreciation for passive investors, and investing in assets that are tax friendly. My friend and CPA, Tom Wheelwright, says that the tax code is simply a series of incentives for investors and small business owners. If the government wants you to behave a certain way, they can get you to do that through tax incentives. Oil and gas investing is a good example of this. Much of the world’s oil reserves are in countries that don’t like us much, so energy independence is desirable for our country. That’s why investing in oil and gas drilling in the US has significant tax benefits.
    Investing with tax benefits in mind can become kind of addicting and it is important to keep tabs on yourself. You want to be careful not to let the tax wag the tail. In other words, tax incentivized investing is valuable but it’s even more valuable to actually make money. After all, you aren’t going to get taxed on investment losses anyway.
    With the new Trump tax code, it is still my opinion that bonus depreciation is still the most powerful and useful benefit available to investors like us. Theoretically, however, there is another new law that is also pretty compelling from a tax perspective. It involves what are called opportunity zones and they are being talked up big in the real estate podcast world. Is it the greatest thing since sliced bread or a bunch of hype? Well, I finally got someone on the show to talk about them.
    My guest this week on Wealth Formula Podcast is Mauricio Rauld. Mauricio, as you may know, is my SEC attorney and an overall great guy. He starts out by giving us a little review on the guidelines for investing in private placements and tells you what to look out for given his breadth of experience.
    Then we get into the nitty gritty of Opportunity Zones on which he has become an expert. Quite honestly, I thought I knew more on the topic than I did before talking to Mauricio. If you are a serious investor, especially if you are trying to figure out how to deal with capital gains taxes, do not miss this show.
    48 min
  • 160: Bull Markets in the Least Ugly Economy in the World!
    I am a lousy trader. I’ve said it before and I fully recognize this fact. That’s why, I try very hard to stay focussed on investing rather than trading. Nevertheless, I still get trapped in behaviors that I invariably regret.
    For example, you may know that I am a believer in bitcoin. I truly believe this will be one of the best investments of my lifetime over the course of the next few years. That’s why when it dropped to $3100, I should’ve bought some more. But, I didn’t because I got greedy. I figured it might drop even more so I waited.
    The end result was that by the time I bought more, it had actually doubled in price. Now, over the long run I still think that’s not a bad price at all. Especially considering I believe that we will see $100,000 bitcoin within the next couple of years. However, I was kicking myself because I was timing something instead of just recognizing that it was a good time to buy.
    In the heat of the moment, it’s hard to remember Warren Buffett’s wisdom. Here’s a good quote for you. “It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.” The point is recognize when you have a good opportunity and can buy a quality asset at a fair price and just do it!
    Now some of you may disagree with me that bitcoin is a “quality“ asset. We can agree to disagree. However, let’s focus on that principal with another example.
    One of my friends is a famous home designer and is particularly well known amongst Hollywood celebrities. He told me about a house he once put on sale in Los Angeles. At the time, it was the most expensive house per square foot in all of Los Angeles.
    He had a very motivated buyer who happened to be the daughter of a well-known tech billionaire. My friend said that dad had three questions before he bought the house for his daughter. 1) Was the house in a desirable area? 2) Did the house have a great views? 3) Was the house built well?
    The broker assured him that all three answers were a resounding yes. The billionaire went on and bought that house for his daughter at full price. And, that house which was the most expensive house per square foot in LA at the time (in 2007), sold for a significant profit only 10 years later even after the housing correction.
    The moral of the story?—most of the time when we think we are saving money, we really aren’t. It may be more expensive to buy a higher quality asset or an asset that is in a higher quality area. However, over the long run, you will come out ahead.
    Think of it this way. Ikea furniture is not going to appreciate. So, if you can afford it, buy something that might appreciate so that, someday, you have something of greater value.
    This is the kind of perspective you get over time. That’s why it’s a good idea to listen to people of been around for a while. Tyler Jenks is one of those guys. He’s been in the financial industry since 1971. That’s before I was even born!
    Tyler can speak on a broad base of financial topics with perspective that is both unusual and multidimensional. From the S&P 500 to gold and even to bitcoin, Tyler is a wealth of knowledge as you will see on this week's Wealth Formula Podcast.
    1 hr 14 min
  • 160: Bull Markets in the Least Ugly Economy in the World!
    I am a lousy trader. I’ve said it before and I fully recognize this fact. That’s why, I try very hard to stay focussed on investing rather than trading. Nevertheless, I still get trapped in behaviors that I invariably regret.
    For example, you may know that I am a believer in bitcoin. I truly believe this will be one of the best investments of my lifetime over the course of the next few years. That’s why when it dropped to $3100, I should’ve bought some more. But, I didn’t because I got greedy. I figured it might drop even more so I waited.
    The end result was that by the time I bought more, it had actually doubled in price. Now, over the long run I still think that’s not a bad price at all. Especially considering I believe that we will see $100,000 bitcoin within the next couple of years. However, I was kicking myself because I was timing something instead of just recognizing that it was a good time to buy.
    In the heat of the moment, it’s hard to remember Warren Buffett’s wisdom. Here’s a good quote for you. “It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.” The point is recognize when you have a good opportunity and can buy a quality asset at a fair price and just do it!
    Now some of you may disagree with me that bitcoin is a “quality“ asset. We can agree to disagree. However, let’s focus on that principal with another example.
    One of my friends is a famous home designer and is particularly well known amongst Hollywood celebrities. He told me about a house he once put on sale in Los Angeles. At the time, it was the most expensive house per square foot in all of Los Angeles.
    He had a very motivated buyer who happened to be the daughter of a well-known tech billionaire. My friend said that dad had three questions before he bought the house for his daughter. 1) Was the house in a desirable area? 2) Did the house have a great views? 3) Was the house built well?
    The broker assured him that all three answers were a resounding yes. The billionaire went on and bought that house for his daughter at full price. And, that house which was the most expensive house per square foot in LA at the time (in 2007), sold for a significant profit only 10 years later even after the housing correction.
    The moral of the story?—most of the time when we think we are saving money, we really aren’t. It may be more expensive to buy a higher quality asset or an asset that is in a higher quality area. However, over the long run, you will come out ahead.
    Think of it this way. Ikea furniture is not going to appreciate. So, if you can afford it, buy something that might appreciate so that, someday, you have something of greater value.
    This is the kind of perspective you get over time. That’s why it’s a good idea to listen to people of been around for a while. Tyler Jenks is one of those guys. He’s been in the financial industry since 1971. That’s before I was even born!
    Tyler can speak on a broad base of financial topics with perspective that is both unusual and multidimensional. From the S&P 500 to gold and even to bitcoin, Tyler is a wealth of knowledge as you will see on this week's Wealth Formula Podcast.
    1 hr 14 min

About Wealth Formula

From the publisher's feed

The Wealth Formula - by Buck Joffrey