In 2022, Ethereum made a bold move to reduce its energy consumption by ninety-nine percent by switching to proof of stake, earning praise for its environmental benefits. However, Bitcoin, the world's most popular cryptocurrency, continues to consume as much energy as the entire country of the Philippines. While there is no technical barrier preventing Bitcoin from making the same change, social resistance within the community poses a significant challenge. As regulators and environmentalists increase pressure, the question remains: can Bitcoin overcome these social hurdles and follow Ethereum's lead?
This study is for academic purpose only and should NOT be treated as an investment advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile ecosystem and any investment should be done based on individual risk appetite. This study do not promote any crypto investment.
Buterin, V. (2022). Proof of stake: The making of Ethereum and the philosophy of blockchains. Seven Stories Press.
Castor, A. (2023, February 28). Ethereum moved to proof of stake. Why can’t Bitcoin? MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/28/1069190/ethereum-moved-to-proof-of-stake-why-cant-bitcoin/
Lin, S. (2023). Proof of work vs. Proof of stake in cryptocurrency. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 39, 953-961.
Sarkodie, S. A., Amani, M. A., Ahmed, M. Y., & Owusu, P. A. (2023). Assessment of Bitcoin carbon footprint. Sustainable Horizons, 7, 100060.
Stoll, C., Klaaßen, L., & Gallersdörfer, U. (2019). The carbon footprint of bitcoin. Joule, 3(7), 1647-1661.