Western Moral Philosophy For Beginners

Deep Dive Xenophanes 570-475 BCE

Xenophanes, the pre-Socratic philosopher from the ancient city of Colophon, invites us into a world of intellectual inquiry that bridges the gap between mythological understanding and rational explanation. Living during the 6th century BCE, a time when certain philosophical ideas began questioning traditional religious views, Xenophanes stands out for his critical approach to the gods and moral considerations that stem from his observations of the natural world and human behavior. In this episode, we will delve into what makes Xenophanes a pivotal figure in moral philosophy, exploring his central ideas, moral arguments, their implications for contemporary society, and the philosophical dialogues that his thoughts have sparked through the ages.

One of Xenophanes' most striking contributions is his critique of anthropomorphism in the conception of the divine. In his extant fragments, he argues against the prevalent view of gods resembling human beings in form and behavior, positing that if animals could create images of the divine, they would inevitably depict gods that resemble their own forms. For instance, he famously asserts that if horses could draw, they would depict gods as horses, and if lions could paint, their gods would be lion-like. This idea is fundamental, as it underscores how cultural and societal contexts can shape our understanding of the divine. Although often seen as a critique of the Greek pantheon, this argument extends wider; it challenges the notion that any portrayal of the divine can capture an ultimate, ineffable reality. By questioning who we envision the divine to be, he compels us to reflect on the limitations of our own perspectives and beliefs.

Selenius Media

Deep Dive 03 Anaximenes 586-526 BCE

Anaximenes, living between 586 and 526 BCE, was a pre-Socratic philosopher from Ancient Greece, hailing from the city of Miletus. He is often grouped with his mentor, Anaximander, and his predecessor, Thales, as one of the early figures who sought to understand the nature of the cosmos through rational inquiry rather than mythology. Anaximenes is particularly known for his belief that air, rather than water or an abstract concept, is the fundamental substance of the universe. However, his contributions go beyond physics; they also delve into the moral and ethical implications of his ideas.

Anaximenes’s philosophy presents a compelling framework to explore how the physical world influences moral considerations. Central to his thought is an understanding of the concept of change as a process determined by the qualities of the underlying substance, which he identifies as air. For Anaximenes, air is not merely a material entity but a vital, dynamic principle that shapes everything around us. This notion leads to a unique perspective on morality; if air is the source of all existence, and if all things derive their characteristics through processes like rarefaction and condensation, then the moral implications can be profound.

02 Deep Dive Anaximander 610-546 BCE

Anaximander, who lived around 610 to 546 BCE, was a pre-Socratic philosopher from the ancient city of Miletus in what is now Turkey. He holds a significant place in early Western philosophy not only for his contributions to metaphysics and cosmology but also for the foundations he laid for moral philosophy. As we delve into Anaximander’s ideas, we’ll explore his central works, the moral concepts he proposed, and how his thoughts resonate with modern issues in ethics and beyond.

One of the key works attributed to Anaximander is the “On Nature,” though unfortunately, only fragments remain. Nevertheless, Anaximander’s philosophical inquiries provide a glimpse into his thinking, particularly regarding the concept of the "apeiron," which translates to the "infinite," "boundless," or "indeterminate." Central to his philosophy is the idea that the "apeiron" is the originating principle of all that exists. This fundamental notion is significant not just in the realm of metaphysics but also in moral philosophy, as it invites questions about the nature of existence, the implications of infinity, and the relationships between beings and their universe.

Selenius Media

John Rawls 1921 - 2002

In the late 1930s, an anxious teenager sits in a boarding school in Connecticut, surrounded by the trappings of privilege he doesn’t quite know what to do with. The school is Kent, Episcopalian and elite, a feeder into the American establishment. The boy’s days are filled with chapel services, Latin, math, sports, and the casual assumption that people like him will one day help run things. He is shy, serious, and introspective. The world outside his campus is sliding toward catastrophe — the rise of fascism, economic turmoil, the approach of war — but inside the routines of American upper-class life continue. The boy’s name is John Bordley Rawls, and he will spend the second half of the twentieth century trying to answer one basic question: what does a just society look like, if we take seriously the fact that no one really deserves the starting position they’re born into?

Rawls was born in 1921 in Baltimore, Maryland, into a professional, comfortable family. His father was a prominent lawyer; his mother was active in civic and women’s organizations. There were five Rawls boys, and for a time the household must have felt full of energy and promise. Then, in quick succession, tragedy struck: when John was still a child, two of his younger brothers died from illnesses they contracted, probably from him. One died of pneumonia after catching diphtheria; another of an infection after catching measles. It is hard to overstate how scarring this would be for a child: to see brothers die from diseases that passed through your own body. Rawls rarely spoke about this later, but friends and biographers have seen in it a source of the deep sensitivity to guilt, chance, and undeserved misfortune that runs underneath his philosophy.

Selenius Media

William of Ockham

In the early fourteenth century, when Europe’s universities were packed with monks and clerics arguing about God, logic, and the structure of reality, a quiet Franciscan friar from a small English village began to do something dangerous: he started cutting away at the grand systems of his time. It was not a physical blade he wielded, but a habit of mind, a principle that later generations would remember as a “razor”: do not multiply entities beyond necessity. His name was William of Ockham. To later philosophers, he would become a symbol of intellectual sharpness, the man who helped strip scholastic metaphysics down to essentials and who, in doing so, reshaped the background against which Western moral thought developed.

Selenius Media

In the middle of the nineteenth century, when factory chimneys were blackening the skies of Europe and trains were stitching cities together with steel, a bearded émigré in a London reading room was trying to understand why so much new wealth seemed to bring so much new misery. Outside, the streets were full of contrasts: fine houses a carriage ride away from slums where whole families crowded into a single room; lavish shops not far from soup kitchens; workers who had left the countryside for the promise of wages now coughing themselves to death in mills and mines. Inside the British Museum’s reading room, a man in a worn coat sat hunched over economic reports, parliamentary inquiries, and statistics, his handwriting spilling across page after page as he tried to make sense of it all. His name was Karl Marx, and whatever else one says about him, his work would change the moral vocabulary of the modern world. Words like exploitation, alienation, class struggle, ideology, and revolution would never sound the same again.

Selenius Media

In a quiet corner of the Roman Empire sometime in the late second or early third century of our era, a physician sits at a wooden table, scratching notes onto a wax tablet by lamplight. Around him the house is dark; outside, the city is sleeping. On the shelves behind him are scrolls by Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, Chrysippus, Hippocrates. He has read them all, argued with them in his mind, and found in each something impressive and something unproven. Tonight he is trying to do something different. Not to build yet another doctrine about the soul or the gods or the best life, but to catalogue the ways in which any such doctrine can be unsettled. His name is Sextus Empiricus, and though he writes in an age of worn-out certainties and competing cults, what he sets down will become one of the most powerful handbooks of doubt ever composed.

We know almost nothing about Sextus’ personal life in the way we know about Socrates or Seneca. He left no anecdotes about himself, no self-dramatizing death. What we have are his works: dense, sometimes repetitive, but astonishingly systematic. He was almost certainly a doctor by profession, probably of the Empiric school of medicine, which distrusted grand theories about hidden causes and relied instead on observation, experience, and analogy. That attitude—suspicion toward unseen explanatory entities, and respect for what can actually be observed—shapes his philosophy.

Selenius Media

01 Deepdive Thales ofMiletus 624_546_BCE The first philosopher

Thales of Miletus, often referred to as the first philosopher, is a figure who emerged in the early 6th century BCE, during a transformative era in human thought. Known for his pioneering inquiries into the nature of the cosmos and the principles governing existence, Thales stands at the cradle of Western philosophy. He is celebrated not only for his explorations in natural science but also for laying the foundational concepts that would influence moral philosophy and ethics.

Selenius Media

Picture Córdoba again, the same city where Averroes walked, but in an earlier, more fragile moment. It is the middle of the twelfth century. Once, this city had been the shining capital of an Umayyad caliphate, famous for its libraries and its mixture of cultures. Now power has shifted. A stricter movement, the Almohads, has crossed from North Africa and taken control. Their theology is uncompromising, their vision of Islam purist. For non-Muslims — Christians and Jews — this means pressure: convert, leave, or live under increasingly harsh conditions. In one Jewish household, a boy is watching his father argue law and theology by candlelight. Books are piled on the floor, in Hebrew and Arabic, Bible and Talmud alongside works of logic and philosophy. The boy is absorbing everything. Soon he will have to leave this city behind and never return. His name is Moses ben Maimon, and he will become known to Jews as Rambam and to the wider world as Maimonides.

On a warm afternoon in the late Roman Republic, in a modest house somewhere near Rome, a man sits at a wooden table, writing verse about atoms. Outside, the streets are noisy with politics: senators scheming in marble halls, generals chasing glory, crowds in the Forum roaring for bread and spectacle. Inside, this man is engaged in something quieter but, in his view, much more urgent. He is trying to free human beings from terror—terror of the gods, of death, of fate—by showing them that everything in the universe is made of small, unseen particles moving through empty space. His name is Titus Lucretius Carus, and the poem taking shape under his hand, De Rerum Natura, On the Nature of Things, will become the most powerful poetic expression of Epicurean moral philosophy that survives from antiquity.

Selenius Media