What Clarence Thomas really thinks

Sean Illing talks with Corey Robin, author of a recent article — as well as a 2019 book — about the life and thought of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Robin discusses how Thomas, whose concurring opinion in the case that overturned Roe v. Wade garnered recent attention, developed the ideological basis of his extremist judicial philosophy, how his views went from the hard-right fringe to more mainstream over the course of his thirty years on the Supreme Court, and how the failures of the 1960's movements shaped his fundamental pessimism about racial progress in America.

Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), Interviews Writer, Vox

Guest: Corey Robin (@CoreyRobin), author; professor of political science, Brooklyn College and CUNY Graduate Center

References: 

The Enigma of Clarence Thomas by Corey Robin (Metropolitan; 2019)

"The Self-Fulfilling Prophecies of Clarence Thomas" by Corey Robin (New Yorker; July 9)

Clarence Thomas's opening statement, Anita Hill hearing (C-SPAN; Oct. 11, 1991)

Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison (1952)

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022); Thomas's concurrence

American Negro Slave Revolts by Herbert Aptheker (1943)

Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution - 1863–1877 by Eric Foner (1988; updated 2014)

The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in An Age of Diminishing Expectations by Christopher Lasch (Norton; 1979)

The Rhetoric of Reaction by Albert O. Hirschman (Harvard; 1991)

Enjoyed this episode? Rate Vox Conversations ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts.

Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of Vox Conversations by subscribing in your favorite podcast app.

Support Vox Conversations by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts

This episode was made by: 

Producer: Erikk Geannikis

Editor: Amy Drozdowska

Engineer: Patrick Boyd

Deputy Editorial Director, Vox Talk: A.M. Hall

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices