
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Michigan Public4.3
151151 ratings
Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

91,074 Listeners

43,956 Listeners

38,238 Listeners

6,821 Listeners

43,622 Listeners

38,952 Listeners

27,068 Listeners

4,031 Listeners

141 Listeners

6,482 Listeners

14,672 Listeners

19 Listeners

4,711 Listeners

112,225 Listeners

9,091 Listeners

16,394 Listeners

295 Listeners