
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Michigan Public4.3
151151 ratings
Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

91,297 Listeners

43,837 Listeners

38,430 Listeners

6,881 Listeners

43,687 Listeners

38,950 Listeners

27,011 Listeners

4,022 Listeners

142 Listeners

6,467 Listeners

14,655 Listeners

19 Listeners

4,696 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

9,100 Listeners

16,512 Listeners

294 Listeners