
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Michigan Public4.3
149149 ratings
Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

91,066 Listeners

38,494 Listeners

38,677 Listeners

27,211 Listeners

25,869 Listeners

11,488 Listeners

137 Listeners

6,341 Listeners

16 Listeners

4,928 Listeners

4,683 Listeners

112,601 Listeners

2,400 Listeners

1,085 Listeners

16,258 Listeners

6,411 Listeners