
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Michigan Public4.3
150150 ratings
Last week, the US Supreme Court published their decision on Creative 303 LLC v. Elenis. Referencing the First Amendment, they held that there is a constitutional right to discriminate against customers based on their sexuality. In Michigan, legislators signed LGBTQ+ civil rights protections into law last March in the expanded Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. So how does this new Supreme Court decision square with Michigan’s current anti-discrimination laws?
GUEST:
Jay Kaplan, Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ rights project staff attorney
___
Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way.
If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.
Music from Blue Dot Sessions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

90,931 Listeners

43,870 Listeners

31,989 Listeners

38,507 Listeners

6,790 Listeners

43,602 Listeners

38,860 Listeners

9,197 Listeners

141 Listeners

14,619 Listeners

18 Listeners

4,662 Listeners

112,032 Listeners

16,335 Listeners

278 Listeners

1,178 Listeners

397 Listeners