Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

100G Ethernet quietly crossed a line from “carrier-only” to “normal enterprise,” and the operational fallout is real: bigger links mean bigger outages, higher stakes, and far less room for sloppy assumptions. We sit down with NetAlly CEO Jeff O’Mara and Product Lead Thomas Doumas to break down why 100G networking is showing up in enterprise environments now, how AI-driven demand is accelerating the bandwidth curve, and what network teams need to do differently when the speed jumps beyond 10G.

We get specific about what actually gets harder at 25G, 40G, and 100G. Auto-negotiation habits that feel natural at lower speeds often do not apply, so both ends of the link can require careful hard-coded settings, with many possible port modes and only a few that will work. Add the “fussy” world of fiber optics at 100G, where connector cleanliness and tiny physical issues can become real failures, and you can see why misconfiguration and optical problems dominate modern troubleshooting.

We also unpack NetAlly’s approach to AI-assisted troubleshooting through what they call Ally Intelligence: guided, field-tested workflows that turn broad complaints into checkable root causes, without relying on generic chat outputs. Then we talk economics and accountability, including how to validate that a 100G service or upgrade is performing to spec, reduce guesswork, and shorten “time to innocence” when the network gets blamed. We close with the upgrade reality of old and new running together, classic landmines like spanning tree, and what comes next as the industry heads toward 400G.

If you want practical, enterprise-focused guidance on testing, troubleshooting, and validating high-speed networks, hit subscribe, share this with your network team, and leave a review. What’s the hardest part of supporting 100G where you work?

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

Your AI budget isn’t blowing up because someone asked too many questions. It’s blowing up because AI agents turn one request into a chain reaction of inference calls, and the infrastructure underneath can’t deliver fast tokens efficiently at scale. We sit down with Vasanth Mohan from SambaNova to get specific about what changes when AI moves from “chat” to “do,” and why enterprises suddenly feel latency, throughput, and cost as operational constraints.

We break down the difference between training and AI inference, then zoom into the agentic reality: swarms of agents, model tiering, and the constant balancing act between tokens per second per request and tokens per second per chip. You’ll hear how model size drives memory pressure, why batching affects your bill, and how to decide when “fast enough” is actually costing you productivity, especially for coding workflows and other tight feedback loops.

Then we go hardware-deep in plain language. Vasant explains SambaNova’s reconfigurable dataflow unit (RDU), why mapping dataflow graphs to silicon can change performance, and how disaggregated inference splits prefill from decode. We also talk about GPUs working alongside other chips, extending the life of existing deployments, and why energy efficiency and air-cooled data centers matter for sovereign AI and global rollouts. We close with a reality check on benchmarks, “benchmaxing,” and why private evals and testing on your own workloads are the only trustworthy path.

If you care about enterprise AI, AI agents, inference optimization, and the real economics of tokens, hit subscribe, share this with a builder on your team, and leave a review with the toughest inference problem you’re trying to solve.

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

Enterprise tech is having a weird moment: innovation is real, but so is the noise. AI shows up in every pitch, “leading” is used in every sentence, and buyers who actually have budgets and deadlines are stuck asking the same question: what’s genuinely worth my time? I’m joined by Rose Ross, founder and chief Trailblazer at the Tech Trailblazers Awards, to talk about how credible startup awards can act as a practical filter for enterprise IT leaders and a meaningful growth lever for founders.

We dig into what makes an enterprise tech awards program valuable instead of performative: clear criteria, a respected panel of judges, and an emphasis on proof over polish. Rose shares how the Tech Trailblazers Awards grew into its 15th edition across categories like cybersecurity, networking, telecoms, containers, sustainability, AI in a B2B context, plus newer frontiers like robotics and quantum computing. We also talk about why customer impact matters more than “sexiness,” and how buyers can use awards as a shortlist without outsourcing their judgment.

If you’re a founder or operator, we get very specific on the practical side: who can enter (nine years or younger and not beyond Series C), the Firestarter subset (three years or younger with no Series A), how to think about the entry like an investor pitch deck, and what judges hate most. The simplest advice wins: answer the question, drop the vague buzzwords, and back every claim with evidence.

Subscribe for more founder and enterprise tech conversations, share this with a builder or buyer who needs a better filter, and leave a review with the best buzzword you never want to hear again.

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

Frontier AI is changing the rules of security, and enterprises feel it first. From the floor at VMware Explore, we sit down with Purnima Padmanabhan
Vice President and General Manager, Tanzu Division, to unpack what customers are asking for as AI agents move into real systems and real data. The headline: private AI is getting a serious bump, not as a trend, but as a control strategy for regulated industries and anyone worried about risk, governance, and cost. 

We walk through the “threat side” of AI, where advanced models can amplify attacks and push open source security to a breaking point. Purima explains why so many enterprise applications depend on open source, especially Spring and Java, and what happens when vulnerability reports spike. We also dig into TrueSource by Broadcom, the idea of a secure software supply chain for curated open source packages, libraries, and images that enterprises can trust and operationalize. 

Then we shift to the “opportunity side”: moving beyond chat and RAG into workflow automation with enterprise AI agents. That raises hard questions about sandboxing, limiting autonomy, and keeping agents secure. Just as important, we talk about why data projects slow everything down, and why governed access to the right data is what makes agents useful at scale. 

Finally, we get practical about developer experience and SDLC automation, including Purima’s example of running a swarm of 21+ agents across planning, Jira creation, coding, and testing, plus the caution that not all AI-generated code is equal. If you’re building on VMware Tanzu, thinking about private cloud AI, or trying to balance security, sovereignty, and TCO, this is for you. Subscribe, share with a builder on your team, and leave a review. What would make you trust an AI agent in production?

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

Agentic AI is showing up everywhere, and it is not waiting for your security program to catch up. From the VMware Explore floor, we talk with Umesh Mahajan, General Manager for Broadcom’s Application Networking and Security Division, about what changes when AI agents become real workloads that talk constantly, call tools through APIs, and evolve by the week. The headline is uncomfortable but useful: AI helps defenders ship faster, but Frontier AI also helps attackers find vulnerabilities and drive more zero-day behavior than many teams are ready to handle.

We dig into the security model that holds up when agents are dynamic and mistakes travel fast. Umesh explains why you have to solve a dual problem: protecting agents from attacks while also preventing a compromised or misdirected agent from attacking others. That leads to concrete priorities like lateral segmentation, distributed firewalling, IDS/IPS, and NDR-style behavioral detection, plus network-level controls to reduce the risk of sensitive data exfiltration. We also talk about discovery, because shadow AI is already a reality. If you cannot identify which agents, MCP tools, servers, and models are running, you cannot confidently separate authorized usage from risky sprawl.

Finally, we tackle the fear every operator has: security that slows the business down. We cover why performance and latency matter more for AI workloads, how enforcement close to the hypervisor can reduce overhead, and what it takes to deploy protection quickly so “bought but not deployed” does not become your weak spot. If you’re building enterprise AI on VMware infrastructure, this is a practical map for getting safer without stalling momentum.

Subscribe for more VMware Explore conversations, share this with the person owning AI rollout, and leave a review with your biggest question about securing agentic AI.

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

AI is making decisions that shape real lives, yet most people cannot see how those decisions get made. We sit down with Scott Zoldi, Chief Analytics Officer at FICO, to unpack what “trustworthy AI” actually requires when the stakes include fraud, credit risk, and customer outcomes in heavily regulated financial services. If you have ever wondered why black box models create so much fear and backlash, this conversation puts clear language around the real issues: data provenance, explainable AI, ethical testing, robustness, and the ability to audit a decision after the fact. 

We go beyond buzzwords and get specific about AI governance. Scott explains why responsible AI starts with a shared model development standard, so a large organization is not running a hundred different approaches that no one can consistently defend. We talk about why monitoring is often the weakest link in real world machine learning, when to retire models that drift, and why enterprises need to stay in control instead of outsourcing critical decisions to models they did not build. 

Then we dig into a practical enforcement mechanism: coupling AI governance with blockchain to create an immutable record of requirements, testing, verification, and release decisions. Think of it as an operating manual that travels with the model and can be inspected years later by regulators, customers, or internal teams. We also look ahead to what changing regulation could mean, including the push toward interpretable models, trust scoring for generative AI, and focused language models or small language models built for narrow tasks with auditable data. 

If you care about responsible AI, AI transparency, and building systems people can actually trust, hit play, then subscribe, share this with a friend who works in AI or compliance, and leave a review with the one governance rule you think every model should follow.

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

Drug discovery is one of the hardest engineering problems on Earth, except it has not always been treated like engineering. Costs can hover around $2 billion per successful drug, timelines can run 10+ years, and too many patients still wait without a cure. We sit down with Rory Kelleher, who leads global business development for life sciences at NVIDIA, to talk about what changes when accelerated computing meets foundation models, generative AI, and agentic AI that can actually do work.

We break down how scientific agents differ from chatbots, and why tools matter as much as models. Rory explains NVIDIA’s BioNEMO Agent Toolkit and the idea of turning core life sciences capabilities into “agent skills” so biologists and chemists can run complex workflows through natural language. We talk protein design and protein binder design, co-folding, bioinformatics, target identification, and ADMET prediction for toxicity and safety, plus why this wave can “democratize” computational drug discovery for scientists who were never trained as programmers.

You’ll also hear a real example from Bristol Myers Squibb, where foundation models trained on proprietary sequences and compound libraries helped improve a sickle cell molecule profile until it reached first-in-human testing. We dig into what an “AI factory” looks like inside pharma, why teams want to run open models and local LLMs on secure infrastructure, and why scientific judgment becomes more important, not less, as agents increase throughput.

If you care about biotech, pharma R&D, life sciences AI, and the future of medicine, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share the episode with a friend in research, and leave a review with the one workflow you want agents to tackle next.

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

Everyone is obsessed with bigger models and faster GPUs, but the part that decides whether AI actually works in the real world is the data behind it. We talk with Paul Speciale CMO at Scality, about what happens when enterprises try to store, protect, and serve AI data at petabyte and exabyte scale, and why the rise of huge context windows turns “just a chat” into a massive storage and latency problem.

We walk through the full enterprise AI pipeline, from data collection and cleansing to inference and the long archive tail most teams never plan for. Paul breaks down which AI phases truly need the fastest storage, why inference can demand microsecond access, and how tiered designs (hot, warm, cool) align to modern GPU stacks. We also dig into what’s changing in the market right now: flash price spikes, constrained supply, and the reality that power per rack often matters more than raw capacity.

From there, we get practical about operations and risk. We explore autonomous infrastructure as “tell the system what you want, not how to do it,” including human-in-the-loop recommendations that can move data to cheaper tiers and cut power bills. We also cover cyber resilient storage, immutability for ransomware defense, and the growing pressure around data sovereignty and even code transparency. If you’re building an AI infrastructure plan, this is the blueprint mindset that keeps GPUs busy and data trustworthy. Subscribe, share this with your infrastructure team, and leave a review with the biggest AI data challenge you’re facing.

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

AI is cranking out more code than ever, but that doesn’t mean teams are shipping the right outcomes. From PegaWorld, I sat down with Steph Lewis, Senior Director of Community Developer Programs at Pega Systems, to unpack what’s actually changing for developers, architects, and business stakeholders as AI, agents, and LLMs reshape enterprise delivery. 

We get specific about the Solution Designer role Steph helped build and why it’s showing up now. We talk about Pega Blueprint as a practical way to turn business ideas into a live application earlier, and how that changes the skills teams need across low-code development, workflow automation, and digital transformation. Steph explains why the goal never changes (delivering value), but the day-to-day work does, especially as “hands-on keyboard” tasks shrink and the need to challenge AI outputs grows. 

A big thread is the human edge: judgment, creativity, and the discipline to align what you build with what stakeholders truly need. We dig into the skills gap Steph sees most often, why workshops and real conversations beat passive training, and what sits behind eye-catching outcomes like 80% of projects going live in 90 days. We also zoom out to what Steph wants for the developer community over the next year: guiding architecture decisions, placing Pega in the right spots, and incorporating other agents only when it makes sense. 

If you care about modern software delivery, developer enablement, and the real-world impact of AI on building systems, this one’s for you. Subscribe, share this with a teammate, and leave a review with your take: what “human skill” will matter most as AI becomes default?

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel

Interested in being a guest? Email us at [email protected]

Your CRM knows a lot about your customers, so why does it still feel like a place you go to do homework? We talk with SugarAI CEO David Roberts about the hard truth many sellers live every week: CRM has mostly evolved into a management tool, not a system that makes reps better in the moment that matters, right before a call, a meeting, or a critical follow-up.

We dig into why the “360-degree view of the customer” often backfires. More dashboards and more reports can create more overwhelm, especially when a rep is managing hundreds of accounts, dozens of deals, and a product catalog with thousands of SKUs. David lays out a more practical promise for AI in CRM: move from data straight to action. Instead of forcing sellers through a rigid process, AI can interpret unstructured sales work like emails and meetings, spot gaps like missing executive sponsors, and recommend the next best step that improves retention, expansion, or new business.

We also explore contextual intelligence and “precision selling” and why generic AI advice is easy to ignore. The best guidance comes from combining customer data with the real selling context: sales methodology, pitch decks, competitive battle cards, and objection handling. For manufacturing and distribution teams, connecting front-office CRM with back-office ERP data like inventory and shipping can surface reorder opportunities without sending reps into endless spreadsheets.

If you care about sales productivity, revenue team performance, AI CRM, and faster sales onboarding, you’ll get a lot from this conversation. Subscribe, share this with a sales leader or RevOps partner, and leave a review with the biggest “next step” you wish your CRM would tell you.

Support the show

More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel