Remember when donor newsletters read like dissertations and first-time givers needed a decoder ring? We take a clear-eyed look at how AI has quietly raised the baseline for clarity in fundraising and communications—and why that shift changes expectations, not the essence of our work. The conversation moves past hype and eye-rolls to focus on what’s actually changing: standards, roles, and the line between acceptable and excellent.

We unpack the two most common reactions to AI—quiet fear about speed and scale, and easy dismissal of flat outputs—and show how both point to the same underlying movement. With faster orientation, basic competence becomes more common across writing, program design, data conversations, and leadership. That makes sloppy or confusing work stand out more, not less. The payoff for teams is a new starting point; the differentiators become human judgment, editorial taste, and ethical responsibility. You’ll hear the cautionary intern story of a 500-piece appeal that yielded a single $45 gift, and how today’s tools could prevent that kind of collapse without replacing the growth that builds wisdom.

We also tackle risks head-on: hallucinated facts, claims that outrun evidence, and the temptation to accept clean prose as finished thinking. You’ll get a practical workflow for using AI to reach baseline faster—then slowing down for rigorous human review, verification, and audience-centered refinement. Speed should buy time to think, not replace it. If you care about donor trust, clear calls to action, and work you can stand behind, this is a guide to working well at a higher floor where competence is common and excellence still belongs to people.

If this conversation resonated, follow the show, share it with a colleague who writes appeals, and leave a quick review to help more fundraisers find it. Your feedback shapes what we explore next.

💡 Want to take the next small step?

→ Free Download: 12 Fundraising Prompts You'll Actually Use

→ Course: The Fundraiser's AI Starter Suite