
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Why Your Partner Isnāt Automatically My Friend
Friendship isnāt a blanket you throw over everyone you like. Itās a pact that requires care, choice, and accountability.
I think about friendship like this: If I have a list of things I need in a friend, and you match that list beautifully, thatās why weāre here. You have your own list too, things your other friends, or your partner, match for you.
But that doesnāt mean our lists are identical. Itās logic, really.
Yet people act like itās folly to keep my own requirements when you introduce me to yours. Like Iām supposed to abandon my list because you vouched for them.
Sometimes there is no compromise. And thatās what this essay is about. The quiet choice to keep my standards. The refusal to merge circles just to make things easier.
Because Iām not interested in forced community. Iām interested in friendship that is chosen, deliberate, and honest about what it needs.
The Problem with Forced Inclusion in Friendship
Itās uncomfortable to say it.
Just because I value you doesnāt mean I automatically want friendship with your partner or your other friends. I donāt merge circles by default. My friendship has requirements, not to exclude, but to protect what real friendship demands.
Itās always awkward when someone says āletās all hang outā or ācome have dinner with my husbandāand I say no.
I see the confusion. The slight hurt. The assumption that closeness with them guarantees closeness with everyone they love.
They believe that if I value them, Iāll automatically value whoever they chose.
Thatās not how I work.
Not because Iām trying to exclude anyone. But because I know what it takes for me to be in real friendship with someone.
When I was younger, I did it. I merged circles without thinking. I thought more connection was always better.
But Iāve learned why I keep my circles separate now.
My grandmother used to say, āA dollar goes with a dollar; itās best a dime goes with a dime.ā She wasnāt talking about American dollars ā Iām using money to make it clear. She meant values. When values align, you can walk together.
Yes, sometimes youāll find a dollar among dimes. But Iām not that dollar. Itās about honouring what each relationship actually is.
And Iām not in the business of fixing other peopleās values for them. Especially when some people donāt want connection, they want to stress your edges just to see you fray.
Why Friendship Standards Arenāt Universal
āSometimes what we call ācommunityā is just convenience.ā
I used to assume everyone had standards for friendship. That we all carried requirements for what we wanted from friendsābased on what we offered in return.
I thought people actually analysed these things for balance.
So it always baffled me when someone would carefully choose a partner who met their needs beautifully, or friends who fit them perfectlyāyet never pause to consider whether those people would be a good fit for me.
Why wouldnāt they analyse that too?
Because these are the things I think about ahead of time. Almost mathematically. Because I care about what Iām building with someone.
And honestly? Those same standards might be exactly why I wouldnāt meet their friends or partners.
Sometimes we treat merging friend groups as proof of trust. But what if itās just avoiding the harder work of seeing what this relationship actually needs?
Iām not looking for forced intimacy.
Iāve spoken about this for years. I even have podcasts dating back to 2011 about how much I despise overfamiliarity.
I donāt want the performance of connection that makes things socially easier but emotionally emptier.
I want to know the space Iām holding with someoneāand that we both want to be there honestly.
Choosing the Kind of Peace You Want in Friendship
People who know me know I value peace. Because when I cause unease, it rattles countries.
But I donāt value the kind of peace that demands silence about whatās wrong.
I want the peace that comes from mutual respect, clear expectations, and trust that conflict can be navigated without rupture.
Iām not a fan of disturbances for the sake of it. But I am known to name the thing others want to leave unsaid. And my friends know that about me.
Over time, people around me start noticing it too. The subtle tensions they used to swallow. The compromises that cost them too much. The conversations they didnāt know they were allowed to have.
It can be unsettling. But thatās the kind of peace I want.
Not the pretending everything is fine. Not the politeness that hides harm.
Real quiet. Earned understanding.
A room where you can exhale because you know youāre safe to be honest.
Defining Your Own Friendship Requirements
My question in this short throwaway essay is simple:
Do you actually ask yourself what your requirements are?
I know most people donāt have an Excel spreadsheet listing their friendship criteria like I do. Theyāre not scheduling quarterly inventory meetings with their long-term friends.
(And if you do, please tell me. Iād be deeply amused.)
But even without a formal system, do you know?
What are the things that make you feel safe in friendship?
What do you need to trust someone enough to be your whole self?
I donāt think everyone needs my standards. But I know I need them.
I want consistency. Not just big words, but reliable action over time.
I care about whether someone can handle disagreement without withdrawing or punishing.
Whether theyāll choose repair over blame.
Whether they can stay when things get uncomfortable instead of walking away.
Because I offer those things. And I want spaces where thatās shared.
I want connection on purpose.
Are You Adopting Someone Elseās Community?
One of the lessons Iāve learned is that sometimes the problem isnāt that we lack community.
Itās that we are adopted into someone elseās.
We take their partner as our own. We absorb their friend group without question. Sometimes we align but often we are just along for the ride.
We tell ourselves itās belonging.
But have you ever paused to ask: Do I even want to be included here?
Would I have chosen these people for myself if it hadnāt been so easy to be swept in?
We skip those questions.
Because inclusion feels good, mainly because rejection feels painful.
But you know what feels better? Belonging you actually chose.
People forget that āBā in DEIB all too conveniently. Itās not just about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, itās about Belonging. And belonging isnāt automatic. Itās built. Itās earned. Itās chosen.
Sometimes what we call ācommunityā is really just convenience.
Sometimes itās a mask we wear to make those connections work.
And when life shifts, when someoneās in crisis, when values change, when truth suddenly matters; thatās when we see what was real and what was forced.
The bridge that brought us together might not hold when someone stops performing.
That doesnāt make you disloyal for noticing. It makes you honest about what you actually need. Their standards might be enough for them.
But youāre allowed to have your own. Itās not rejection to name that. Itās respect.
And itās a chance to choose more intentionally next time.
Why I Keep My Friend Circles Separate
āIf Iām going to make friendshipāyes, like making loveāthen itās worth doing with care.ā
This is why I donāt force my friends to merge.
Not because Iām hiding anything.
But because I want to honour what each relationship actually is. Because I know what I want to hold with someone.
And because I believe friendship deserves that kind of honesty.
If Iām going to make friendshipā¦yes, like making loveā¦then itās worth doing with care.
It deserves intention. It deserves choice. It deserves its own space, where no one has to perform, and nothing important is left unsaid.
Because I donāt want connection by accident.
All featured artworks by contemporary Indian artist Ramesh Pachpande, whose figurative style inspires reflections on intimacy, community, and chosen connection.
If this resonates, you might also want to read my earlier piece on Why I Donāt Mix Friends . It goes deeper into why I keep my circles separate.
If this resonated and you want to support nuanced conversations around healing, and accountability, consider subscribing or donating. Every share matters; but your support sustains the work.
Work With Me: Inclusion Strategy, Keynotes, and Critical Conversations
Explore More from The Lovette Jallow Perspective
You can find more of my essays exploring:
* Neurodivergence, autism, and navigating public life as a Black woman
* Building true inclusion beyond checkbox diversity
* Reclaiming voice and agency across personal, political, and historical landscapes
* Racism in Sweden and systemic injustice
Each essay connects real-world experience with structural analysisāequipping individuals and institutions to think deeper, act smarter, and build sustainable change.
Who is Lovette Jallow?
Lovette Jallow is one of Scandinaviaās most influential voices on systemic racism, intersectional justice, and human rights. She is a nine-time award-winning author, keynote speaker, lecturer, and humanitarian specializing in:
* Neurodiversity and workplace inclusion
* Structural policy reform
* Anti-racism education and systemic change
As one of the few Black, queer, autistic, ADHD, and Muslim women working at the intersection of human rights, structural accountability, and corporate transformation, Lovette offers a uniquely authoritative perspective rooted in lived experience and professional expertise.
Her work bridges theory, research, and actionāguiding institutions to move beyond performative diversity efforts and toward sustainable structural change.
Lovette has worked across Sweden, The Gambia, Libya, and Lebanonātackling institutional racism, legal discrimination, and refugee protection. Her expertise has been sought by outlets like The New York Times and by leading humanitarian organizations addressing racial justice, policy reform, and intersectional equity.
Stay Connected
ā Follow Lovette Jallow for expert insights on building equitable, neurodivergent-affirming environments.
š¹ Website: lovettejallow.comš¹ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/lovettejallowš¹ Instagram: instagram.com/lovettejallowš¹ YouTube: youtube.com/@jallowlovetteš¹ Twitter/X: twitter.com/lovettejallowš¹ Bluesky: bsky.app/profile/lovettejallow.bsky.social
Thanks for reading The Lovette Jallow Perspective! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
By Unfiltered insights grounded in lived experience and deep expertise.Why Your Partner Isnāt Automatically My Friend
Friendship isnāt a blanket you throw over everyone you like. Itās a pact that requires care, choice, and accountability.
I think about friendship like this: If I have a list of things I need in a friend, and you match that list beautifully, thatās why weāre here. You have your own list too, things your other friends, or your partner, match for you.
But that doesnāt mean our lists are identical. Itās logic, really.
Yet people act like itās folly to keep my own requirements when you introduce me to yours. Like Iām supposed to abandon my list because you vouched for them.
Sometimes there is no compromise. And thatās what this essay is about. The quiet choice to keep my standards. The refusal to merge circles just to make things easier.
Because Iām not interested in forced community. Iām interested in friendship that is chosen, deliberate, and honest about what it needs.
The Problem with Forced Inclusion in Friendship
Itās uncomfortable to say it.
Just because I value you doesnāt mean I automatically want friendship with your partner or your other friends. I donāt merge circles by default. My friendship has requirements, not to exclude, but to protect what real friendship demands.
Itās always awkward when someone says āletās all hang outā or ācome have dinner with my husbandāand I say no.
I see the confusion. The slight hurt. The assumption that closeness with them guarantees closeness with everyone they love.
They believe that if I value them, Iāll automatically value whoever they chose.
Thatās not how I work.
Not because Iām trying to exclude anyone. But because I know what it takes for me to be in real friendship with someone.
When I was younger, I did it. I merged circles without thinking. I thought more connection was always better.
But Iāve learned why I keep my circles separate now.
My grandmother used to say, āA dollar goes with a dollar; itās best a dime goes with a dime.ā She wasnāt talking about American dollars ā Iām using money to make it clear. She meant values. When values align, you can walk together.
Yes, sometimes youāll find a dollar among dimes. But Iām not that dollar. Itās about honouring what each relationship actually is.
And Iām not in the business of fixing other peopleās values for them. Especially when some people donāt want connection, they want to stress your edges just to see you fray.
Why Friendship Standards Arenāt Universal
āSometimes what we call ācommunityā is just convenience.ā
I used to assume everyone had standards for friendship. That we all carried requirements for what we wanted from friendsābased on what we offered in return.
I thought people actually analysed these things for balance.
So it always baffled me when someone would carefully choose a partner who met their needs beautifully, or friends who fit them perfectlyāyet never pause to consider whether those people would be a good fit for me.
Why wouldnāt they analyse that too?
Because these are the things I think about ahead of time. Almost mathematically. Because I care about what Iām building with someone.
And honestly? Those same standards might be exactly why I wouldnāt meet their friends or partners.
Sometimes we treat merging friend groups as proof of trust. But what if itās just avoiding the harder work of seeing what this relationship actually needs?
Iām not looking for forced intimacy.
Iāve spoken about this for years. I even have podcasts dating back to 2011 about how much I despise overfamiliarity.
I donāt want the performance of connection that makes things socially easier but emotionally emptier.
I want to know the space Iām holding with someoneāand that we both want to be there honestly.
Choosing the Kind of Peace You Want in Friendship
People who know me know I value peace. Because when I cause unease, it rattles countries.
But I donāt value the kind of peace that demands silence about whatās wrong.
I want the peace that comes from mutual respect, clear expectations, and trust that conflict can be navigated without rupture.
Iām not a fan of disturbances for the sake of it. But I am known to name the thing others want to leave unsaid. And my friends know that about me.
Over time, people around me start noticing it too. The subtle tensions they used to swallow. The compromises that cost them too much. The conversations they didnāt know they were allowed to have.
It can be unsettling. But thatās the kind of peace I want.
Not the pretending everything is fine. Not the politeness that hides harm.
Real quiet. Earned understanding.
A room where you can exhale because you know youāre safe to be honest.
Defining Your Own Friendship Requirements
My question in this short throwaway essay is simple:
Do you actually ask yourself what your requirements are?
I know most people donāt have an Excel spreadsheet listing their friendship criteria like I do. Theyāre not scheduling quarterly inventory meetings with their long-term friends.
(And if you do, please tell me. Iād be deeply amused.)
But even without a formal system, do you know?
What are the things that make you feel safe in friendship?
What do you need to trust someone enough to be your whole self?
I donāt think everyone needs my standards. But I know I need them.
I want consistency. Not just big words, but reliable action over time.
I care about whether someone can handle disagreement without withdrawing or punishing.
Whether theyāll choose repair over blame.
Whether they can stay when things get uncomfortable instead of walking away.
Because I offer those things. And I want spaces where thatās shared.
I want connection on purpose.
Are You Adopting Someone Elseās Community?
One of the lessons Iāve learned is that sometimes the problem isnāt that we lack community.
Itās that we are adopted into someone elseās.
We take their partner as our own. We absorb their friend group without question. Sometimes we align but often we are just along for the ride.
We tell ourselves itās belonging.
But have you ever paused to ask: Do I even want to be included here?
Would I have chosen these people for myself if it hadnāt been so easy to be swept in?
We skip those questions.
Because inclusion feels good, mainly because rejection feels painful.
But you know what feels better? Belonging you actually chose.
People forget that āBā in DEIB all too conveniently. Itās not just about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, itās about Belonging. And belonging isnāt automatic. Itās built. Itās earned. Itās chosen.
Sometimes what we call ācommunityā is really just convenience.
Sometimes itās a mask we wear to make those connections work.
And when life shifts, when someoneās in crisis, when values change, when truth suddenly matters; thatās when we see what was real and what was forced.
The bridge that brought us together might not hold when someone stops performing.
That doesnāt make you disloyal for noticing. It makes you honest about what you actually need. Their standards might be enough for them.
But youāre allowed to have your own. Itās not rejection to name that. Itās respect.
And itās a chance to choose more intentionally next time.
Why I Keep My Friend Circles Separate
āIf Iām going to make friendshipāyes, like making loveāthen itās worth doing with care.ā
This is why I donāt force my friends to merge.
Not because Iām hiding anything.
But because I want to honour what each relationship actually is. Because I know what I want to hold with someone.
And because I believe friendship deserves that kind of honesty.
If Iām going to make friendshipā¦yes, like making loveā¦then itās worth doing with care.
It deserves intention. It deserves choice. It deserves its own space, where no one has to perform, and nothing important is left unsaid.
Because I donāt want connection by accident.
All featured artworks by contemporary Indian artist Ramesh Pachpande, whose figurative style inspires reflections on intimacy, community, and chosen connection.
If this resonates, you might also want to read my earlier piece on Why I Donāt Mix Friends . It goes deeper into why I keep my circles separate.
If this resonated and you want to support nuanced conversations around healing, and accountability, consider subscribing or donating. Every share matters; but your support sustains the work.
Work With Me: Inclusion Strategy, Keynotes, and Critical Conversations
Explore More from The Lovette Jallow Perspective
You can find more of my essays exploring:
* Neurodivergence, autism, and navigating public life as a Black woman
* Building true inclusion beyond checkbox diversity
* Reclaiming voice and agency across personal, political, and historical landscapes
* Racism in Sweden and systemic injustice
Each essay connects real-world experience with structural analysisāequipping individuals and institutions to think deeper, act smarter, and build sustainable change.
Who is Lovette Jallow?
Lovette Jallow is one of Scandinaviaās most influential voices on systemic racism, intersectional justice, and human rights. She is a nine-time award-winning author, keynote speaker, lecturer, and humanitarian specializing in:
* Neurodiversity and workplace inclusion
* Structural policy reform
* Anti-racism education and systemic change
As one of the few Black, queer, autistic, ADHD, and Muslim women working at the intersection of human rights, structural accountability, and corporate transformation, Lovette offers a uniquely authoritative perspective rooted in lived experience and professional expertise.
Her work bridges theory, research, and actionāguiding institutions to move beyond performative diversity efforts and toward sustainable structural change.
Lovette has worked across Sweden, The Gambia, Libya, and Lebanonātackling institutional racism, legal discrimination, and refugee protection. Her expertise has been sought by outlets like The New York Times and by leading humanitarian organizations addressing racial justice, policy reform, and intersectional equity.
Stay Connected
ā Follow Lovette Jallow for expert insights on building equitable, neurodivergent-affirming environments.
š¹ Website: lovettejallow.comš¹ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/lovettejallowš¹ Instagram: instagram.com/lovettejallowš¹ YouTube: youtube.com/@jallowlovetteš¹ Twitter/X: twitter.com/lovettejallowš¹ Bluesky: bsky.app/profile/lovettejallow.bsky.social
Thanks for reading The Lovette Jallow Perspective! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.