By David Stephen who considers Human Intelligence in this article.

There is no AI company on earth, currently, that has a Human Intelligence Research Lab. This means a lab that exists just to study and show how human intelligence works. None, zero.

This lab would not cost them as much as AI, and could become more important and profitable than their work on AI - given the world's population. However, they don't, even the so-called good people doing AI for humanity research. Something like, for all the investments in AI, this fraction must go to outlining [natural] human intelligence. Human intelligence is human jurisdiction. AI, regardless of whose, is based without, subjecting its availability to facilities.

A Lab for Human Intelligence Research

There is no lab, anywhere - in or of any organization - that has produced a model of how human intelligence works. Simply, there is no lab, currently, anywhere, that seems close to that goal or seeking - directly - to develop and explain how human intelligence works.

There are all kinds of human and machine cognition labs. Many often state that they are using AI to understand the human brain. There is little to no merit to any project whatsoever, around using large language models [LLMs], or other AI approaches toward understanding how human intelligence works. They have no outstanding postulate, no case for probable components - aside from neurons - and no way to show what they are doing, without AI.

Human intelligence is defined as the use of memory [or information] in the brain. Simply, excellence in using what is known is intelligence. Now, how does an individual use what is known to result in intelligence? Say there is information, how does the individual use the information for the best possible outcome, in reality? What was mechanized in the brain? What are the components of intelligence? What are the attributes? How are they similar or different from those of memory, emotion, feeling, and regulation of internal sensations?

Maybe working on human intelligence is so hard it seems impossible. Maybe labs have given up on human intelligence. Maybe some have concluded that human intelligence is hopeless so nothing can be done to change it. However, no matter the excellence of artificial intelligence, it is still not humans' in terms of unassisted [or unattached] possession. Neurotechnology is also not humans. They are all external and will be externally accessed. They could be owned in some form or controlled by others, or subject to external servicing and management. The are no guarantees that natural intelligence would widely benefit [all humans] no matter their [AI and neurotechnology universal] adoption.

AI in Education

If AI is helping in education, what exactly should AI be helping since AI can do it all, including aspects of work, post-college. Simply, while AI can assist understanding, what can AI currently change or not change, about the [natural, not augmented] efficiency of human intelligence?

How should AI guide learning, that, without AI, learning can advance, naturally? What should be known about how human intelligence works to ensure that the architecture is used to set boundaries about AI's impending sweep of the educational system?

Human Intelligence

How does any human being pass an exam? Study and answer questions in smart ways? How does anyone do an activity, with great planning and then carefully execution, to have the desired outcome?

Only two factors matter, it appears, in the question of human intelligence, what information exist in the brain and how they go from one point to the other to result in [use as] intelligence?

If complex solutions are sort to problems, what makes figuring them out difficult or otherwise? What can be shown as a basic model of how human intelligence works to prospect approaches to memory, learning, comprehension and problem solving, to move the world forward by humans, wherever located, without ultimate dependencies on AI, or neurot...