
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Andrew is joined by Dr. Rodney Schmaltz, a psychology professor at MacEwan University, to explore what the evidence actually says about productivity, meaningful work, and how we structure our days, and where the popular advice gets it wrong.
Rod's perspective is shaped by two research streams that turn out to have more in common than they first appear: studying how people thrive at work, and studying why people believe things that aren't supported by evidence. That combination gives him an unusually clear-eyed view of the productivity myths and workplace assumptions that so many of us accept without question.
Together, Andrew and Rod move from myth-busting to a set of research-backed principles called Boice's Rules, originally developed for academics struggling with procrastination and writing, that turn out to apply remarkably well to anyone trying to do meaningful work more sustainably.
Key TakeawaysMany people experience frustration that they're not doing enough, working the right way, or finding enough meaning in what they do — and a steady stream of productivity content tends to make that worse rather than better.
Rod takes those claims seriously enough to test them, and found that the path to a better workday is less about discipline or passion and more about small, deliberate design choices that actually hold up under scrutiny.
About Our GuestDr. Rodney Schmaltz is a psychology professor at MacEwan University in Edmonton, where he teaches and researches at the intersection of workplace productivity and the science of belief. His work focuses on evidence-based approaches to thriving at work, alongside strategies to help people become better, more critical consumers of information, including the kind that shows up in our LinkedIn feeds.
By Eudaimonic by Design5
99 ratings
In this episode, Andrew is joined by Dr. Rodney Schmaltz, a psychology professor at MacEwan University, to explore what the evidence actually says about productivity, meaningful work, and how we structure our days, and where the popular advice gets it wrong.
Rod's perspective is shaped by two research streams that turn out to have more in common than they first appear: studying how people thrive at work, and studying why people believe things that aren't supported by evidence. That combination gives him an unusually clear-eyed view of the productivity myths and workplace assumptions that so many of us accept without question.
Together, Andrew and Rod move from myth-busting to a set of research-backed principles called Boice's Rules, originally developed for academics struggling with procrastination and writing, that turn out to apply remarkably well to anyone trying to do meaningful work more sustainably.
Key TakeawaysMany people experience frustration that they're not doing enough, working the right way, or finding enough meaning in what they do — and a steady stream of productivity content tends to make that worse rather than better.
Rod takes those claims seriously enough to test them, and found that the path to a better workday is less about discipline or passion and more about small, deliberate design choices that actually hold up under scrutiny.
About Our GuestDr. Rodney Schmaltz is a psychology professor at MacEwan University in Edmonton, where he teaches and researches at the intersection of workplace productivity and the science of belief. His work focuses on evidence-based approaches to thriving at work, alongside strategies to help people become better, more critical consumers of information, including the kind that shows up in our LinkedIn feeds.

153 Listeners