Send us a text

What happens when a society normalizes violence as a political tool? In our analysis of The Purge: Election Year, we explore how this third installment in the franchise transforms from simple horror premise into pointed political commentary.

Senator Charlie Roan's presidential campaign promises to end the annual Purge, making her the perfect target when government officials suddenly lose their immunity just weeks before election day. Frank Grillo returns as Leo Barnes, now serving as the senator's head of security, forced to navigate the most dangerous Purge night yet. As the New Founding Fathers of America deploy mercenaries to eliminate their political opposition, we witness the ultimate battle between pragmatic survival instincts and idealistic moral principles.

The film's political subtext couldn't be more transparent, and we dissect how its 2016 release date coincided with a particularly divisive election year in real-world America. From the disturbing church "sacrifice" scene to the questionable concept of "Purge insurance," we break down what works, what doesn't, and what genuinely terrifies in this politically-charged horror film. We debate whether Senator Roan's unwillingness to fight back makes her admirably principled or frustratingly naive when facing enemies who don't share her moral code.

Our conversation veers into hypothetical survival strategies, weapon choices, and whether any insurance company would actually cover Purge damage (spoiler: absolutely not). We also rank all three Purge films we've covered so far, discussing how this particular entry manages to expand the mythology while delivering the visceral thrills fans expect. Whether you're here for the social commentary or the creative kill scenes, our breakdown of The Purge: Election Year offers something for every survival enthusiast.