The Dangerous Drugs law has provisions that protect the innocent. Non presentation of the informant in this case seemed to militate against the claim of the police for any buy bust operation. Weight of shabu/methamphetamine hydrochloride was not indicated in any of the documentary evidence done by the police officers and it was only in the chemistry report which made their operation suspicious. Three tiered witnesses not completed, no justifiable ground offered. PP. vs. Marvin Madrona Otico GR No. 231133

Legal Story: Dangerous Drugs case. Learn how the two women got acquitted from the false charges of the police. What are the requirements that the police failed to offer in evidence? What is the three tiered witnesses that must accompany any illegal drugs operation in order to prevent the innocent from being indicted? These and other questions will be answered by the case of PP v. HILARIO GR. No. 210610

Legal Story- A divorce decree was obtained by a Filipina in Japan and she was denied recognition in the Philippines by the lower court. How did the Supreme Court resolved it on appeal? What are the requirements under the law to be offered in evidence from the start to be granted a recognition of foreign divorce decree to shorten the process? These questions shall be answered by this case...RP v. TANEDO MANALO

A contract terminated earlier where lessor asks for future rentals contained in the stipulations. Are rallies considered fortuitous event to excuse non payment? Are penalty clause allowable? What is the difference between termination of contract and rescission of contracts? What are its respective effects on payment? These questions shall be answered in the case of PRYCE CORP vs. PAGCOR.