WIV Reports

Recorded November 18, 2020

Current Episodes at https://walkinverse.buzzsprout.com/

I am moving all podcast here slowly. I will keep buzzsprout for all public reports and here for member only content.

This was the episode which got me removed from twitter. Been on the platform for years, never an issue before and then, just like that, gone in a blink of an eye. The account is suspended to this day.

Episode #16, “Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Hero or Villain.” 

In this report, we will dig into a little background of this hero, Ruth Ginsburg. The supposed champion of law and order and women’s rights.

WIV Reports — Uncensored is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit walkinverse.substack.com/subscribe

Episode #16, “Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Hero or Villain.” 

In this report, we will dig into a little background of this hero, Ruth Ginsburg. The supposed champion of law and order and women’s rights.

Consider Joining

Subscribe to my Free Newsletter and keep current with my new work as it unfolds. Or considered a Paid Subscription and receive access to members only content.

• https://walkinverse.substack.com/

Follow on Telegram

• https://t.me/wivupdates

Support the show

Recorded July 27, 2020

https://walkinverse.buzzsprout.com/

For those who still take any kind of test for COV I would advise you to stop. Since I wrote this initial report we have learned more about the test and procedures used. The PCR test doesn’t work, it generates false positives. The nasal swabs are now known to cause severe adverse reactions due to the chemicals contained within. The e-book will be updated with new inforomation and expanded. Once complete, it’ll be available to all paid members or on Amazon for $5.99.

Episode #15, "PCR Test, the Gold Standard."

In this report, we will dig into the PCR test that they claim is the gold standard and used to drive policy in the US and world.

According to Dr. Pascal Sacré, the test is not reliable as it produces simplistic answers, allowing governments to manipulate results to manage what people think and believe. It’s to instill fear for political gain, to deceive the people into giving up their rights.

The way the PCR test works, it collects cell samples from the back of the nose, hence the long swabs.  They then search the samples (your DNA) for the SARS-COV-2 virus by amplifying the gathered cells to identify the person as positive or negative for COVID-19.

An important note is this test is highly complicated and subject to a collection of missteps. Yet, we are told this is the gold standard? [1]

PCR Test Results (False Positives & Negatives)

And as we dig further into PCR, the issue with this test is emerging to the forefront.  Even the CDC has come out with guidelines on how to interrupt the results. A Gold Standard test now needs interpretations of its results.  

On the Whitehouse website, their guidance states for all COVID test that “if you test positive you Most likely* have an active COVID-19 infection. [2]”

And what does the asterisk mean with the word likely?

“No test is ever perfect. All tests occasionally result in false-positive results…”

And if we look at the CDC website on antibody testing, what do they say a positive test means?

“A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold. [3]”

It means you can have a common cold. With that said, in an article dated May 2020 [4], it states how growing concerns are over the accuracy of the test.

Quote:

“First, you should know that a true positive result means that the test did find what it was looking for. For example, if you get tested for flu, a true positive result means that the test detected the presence of genetic material from the flu virus. On the other hand, a true false result means that no genetic material from the flu was detected.”

“But the trouble with tests (PCR) is that you can’t be sure what you are getting is a true positive or true negative. You have to rely on probabilities.”

And secondly:

“A false positive means that the test shows a positive result, but in reality it should be a negative result. This means that a patient may be told that they have COVID-19, but they actually do not.”

“A false negative means that the test shows a negative result, but it should have been a positive result. This means that the patient may be told they don’t have COVID-19, but they actually are infected.”

And as sated earlier, they contribute some reason for these fraudulent results to samples contaminated with the virus and, or, human error [5].

 “Coronavirus Cases Up The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate. However, when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital, they confirmed errors in the report. Orlando Health’s positivity rate is only 9.4 percent, not 98 percent as in the report.”

With all that stated, what does Dr. Kary Mullins say about the PCR test he created [6],

“Kary Mullis…  With regard to the viral-load tests, which attempt to use PCR for counting viruses, Mullis has stated: ‘Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.’ PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”

In other words, when he stated, “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.” He’s saying the PCR test can’t be used to define how much of the virus is in the body. The test is pretty much meaningless for COVID results; its primary purpose is its ability to lock you down and strip away your liberties and freedoms.  

Let that sink in.

Don’t use PCR for COV

As we continue, what else Dr. Mullis have to say on the topic [7],

“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.”

And when Dr. David Rasnick, a biochemist, was asked about the test and process he expressed the following,

“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it…”

“You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms … the dead cells are generating the symptoms.” [7]

They then asked about his advice on whether one should take the test. He replied,

“Don’t do it… No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.”

Now, why would this doctor state this test would devastate your life?

Quote,

“Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. It’s to track us, they’re not just looking for the virus.”

And one last take away from Dr. Rasnick is, 

“PCR for diagnosis is a big problem,” he continues. “When you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it’s going to generate massive amounts of false positives. Again, I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.”

And in another article, it reaffirms what Dr. Rasnick said without realizing it. They concluded, “PCR tests specific for COVID-19 are possible because the viral sequence was shared globally via a public database.” [8]

So, as stated by the inventor and many other experts, once the DNA is collected and replicated millions of times, lab technicians check the results against a shared global public database such as the REDCap [9] database.

REDCap: Global Surveillance

REDCap is a globally distributed database used today by over 4,300 active partners in 137 countries, including the CDC and WHO.  It’s used for the tracking and support of COVID-19 test results and individuals.

In April, ApiJet Systems Corp. was awarded a $138M DoD contract to provide 100 [10] million pre-filled syringes for distribution across the United States by the end of 2020 via project Jumpstart.

These syringes have an optional RFID tag and GPS-based location tracking option, a.k.a. Contact Tracing. The data is submitted to a global data store for real-time injection mapping and monitoring, thanks to big-tech companies such as Apple and Google [11].

And to make everyone feel more confident, they claim this is for their citizens’ safety as it allows their governments to defend them against pandemics and improve global access to essential medicines (vaccines).

WIV Reports — Uncensored is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

References

1.        Wyllie, A. L. et al. Saliva is more sensitive for SARS-CoV-2 detection in COVID-19 patients than nasopharyngeal swabs. medRxiv 2020.04.16.20067835 (2020) doi:10.1101/2020.04.16.20067835.

2.        Interpreting COVID-19 Test Results. Whitehouse 1.

3.        CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Testing. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html (2020).

4.        Chia-Yi Hou. False positive and false negative coronavirus test results explained. TheHill https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/496651-false-positive-and-false-negative-coronavirus (2020).

5.        Tyler Durden. Florida Labs Acknowledge ‘Major Errors’ After Reporting Positivity Rates Of 100%. Zero Hedge https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/several-florida-labs-report-positivity-rates-100 (2020).

6.        The Ebola Test’s Inventor Says The Test Is Unreliable. Transmissions http://transmissionsmedia.com/the-ebola-tests-inventor-says-the-test-is-unreliable/ (2014).

7.        Farber, C. Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? UncoverDC https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ (2020).

8.        PCR testing inventor speaks to WGN amid COVID-19 pandemic. WGN-TV https://wgntv.com/news/coronavirus/pcr-testing-inventor-speaks-to-wgn-amid-covid-19-pandemic/ (2020).

9.        REDCap. REDCap https://projectredcap.org/

10.      $138M DOD Contract: ApiJect Will Supply Prefilled Coronavirus Syringes with RFID GPS Tracking and Confirmation. USAHITMAN Conspiracy News https://usahitman.com/apiject-rfid-covid/ (2020).

11.      Gurman, M. Apple, Google Bring Covid-19 Contact-Tracing to 3 Billion People. Bloomberg.com (2020).

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit walkinverse.substack.com/subscribe

Episode #15, "PCR Test, the Gold Standard."

In this report, we will dig into the PCR test that they claim is the gold standard and used to drive policy in the US and world.

Consider Joining

Subscribe to my Free Newsletter and keep current with my new work as it unfolds. Or considered a Paid Subscription and receive access to members only content.

• https://walkinverse.substack.com/

Follow on Telegram

• https://t.me/wivupdates

Support the show

Recorded July 20, 2020

Episode #14, "CDC Maskdemic, The Research." When we read over the guidelines from the CDC, studies, and reports, we must pay careful attention to the words used as they change the meaning dramatically.

In this episode, I will cover CDC pages and cited articles used to drive policy across our nation and the world.

WIV Reports — Uncensored is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit walkinverse.substack.com/subscribe

Episode #14, "CDC Maskdemic, The Research." 

When we read over the guidelines from the CDC, studies, and reports, we must pay careful attention to the words used as they change the meaning dramatically.

In this episode, I will cover CDC pages and cited articles used to drive policy across our nation and the world.

Consider Joining

Subscribe to my Free Newsletter and keep current with my new work as it unfolds. Or considered a Paid Subscription and receive access to members only content.

• https://walkinverse.substack.com/

Follow on Telegram

• https://t.me/wivupdates

Support the show

Recorded July 07, 2020

https://walkinverse.buzzsprout.com/

In episode #13, "Who is Seattle's Sawant?," I will dig a little into this political figure, and how they are involved in the protest and riots in and around CHOP, Seattle Autonomous zone.   

WIV Reports — Uncensored is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit walkinverse.substack.com/subscribe

In episode #13, "Who is Seattle's Sawant?," I will dig a little into this political figure, and how they are involved in the protest and riots in and around CHOP, Seattle Autonomous zone.   

Consider Joining

Subscribe to my Free Newsletter and keep current with my new work as it unfolds. Or considered a Paid Subscription and receive access to members only content.

• https://walkinverse.substack.com/

Follow on Telegram

• https://t.me/wivupdates

Support the show

Recorded May 27, 2020

https://walkinverse.buzzsprout.com/

In episode #12, "HR 6666, the Overview," I show the dangers in this bill and share some insight.  This is a multi-part podcast that will dive into 4th Amendment violations and privacy issues surrounding contact tracing.   

Overview

H.R. 66661

This bill authorizes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to award grants for testing, contact tracing, monitoring, and other activities to address COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019). Entities such as federally qualified health centers, nonprofit organizations…

By the ambiguous words used in this bill we are at risk.  When they say nonprofit organizations, we the people need to know who they are.  One of the organizations used for tracing is Partners in Health 2, which I will dive into later.

As we continue to read the overview is states

… awarding the grants, the CDC shall prioritize applicants that (1) operate in hot spots and medically underserved communities, and (2) agree to hire individuals from the communities where grant activities occur.

Another concern is how they will hire. We have seen with Census workers they have hired felons and child sex offenders for workers under their programs.  And in 2020 3 they did it again to help with the Census count.  I cannot even imagine who they will find for H.R. 6666.

SEC. 2. COVID–19 TESTING AND CONTACT TRACING USING MOBILE HEALTH UNITS.

This section, “COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act 1”, it’s interesting as it sets the basis for fourth amendment and additional privacy rights violations. It will allow for entry into a home, to potentially quarantine and collect identifiable data by workers who may not be so qualified especially due to the individuals they hire from the communities of underserved and hot spot areas.

2 (a) General

In this section 2a – General;

The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, may award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals, and to support the quarantine of such contacts, through—

And the vehicles in which they will pursue is via mobile health units and residential quarantine & testing. 

Again, it’s loosely defined leaving for interpretation.

2 (b) Funding

A grant recipient under this section may use the grant funds, in support of the activities described in subsection

(1)  to hire, train, compensate, and pay the expenses of individuals; and

(2)  to purchase personal protective equipment and other supplies.

This section I found interesting.  To hire someone is to pay and with it comes training. And with training comes compensation. But for what?

Many online schools are offering free training4 with certificates. But, the issue with these courses is the misinformation throughout.  And what is even more bothersome is John Hopkins, the same University behind Event 201 5, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation is offering these classes.

Some of the topics include the history of SARS-CoV-2, interventions through contact tracing, identify common barriers and how to overcome and my favorite, ethical consideration around tracing, isolation and quarantine. 

Next is they will compensate and pay expenses which is starting to sound a lot like contractors or mercenaries.

compensate

Compensate is a verb and it means;

1 [with object] give (someone) something, typically money, in recognition of loss, suffering, or injury incurred;

Why I bring this to the forefront is in the bill it mentions to pay, and the word compensate.  You would not pay and compensate if you did not expect some kind of loss.

pay expenses

Next is to pay expenses.  And again, it has the feeling of a contractors who must reimburse themselves and well as a mercenary who is hired to pay without thought of consequences in whom they engage.

2 (c) Priority

They will hire anyone from hot spot communities, or any individual areas that lack access to primary care.

In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to—

(1)  applicants proposing to conduct activities funded under this section in hot spots and medically underserved communities; and

Medically Underserved Areas6

An example of who they will target is the Homeless. In Austin Texas they are testing ID20207 to track medical and criminal records of these individuals using blockchain technology to digital identity and 5G to scale.  Other types of individuals on are those who are Medicaid-eligible, Native American and Migrant farmworkers. 

There is always an exception to the rule.  If they wish to go after other areas, the requesting person must explain the reason along with written consent to the person in charge.  Such as a state’s governor or representative and the local health official. Again, vague usage of who they must submit the request to as it leaves them room for working with third parties.

2 (e) Federal privacy requirements

This section quotes a few interesting laws in which they must adhere to while performing their tracing tasks.

Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any Federal privacy or confidentiality requirement, including the regulations promulgated under section 264(c)8 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPPA) Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–191; 110 Stat. 2033) and section 543 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290dd–2).

Section 264(c) Regulations

These regulations center on a person's identifiable health data connected with electronic data exchange, as stated in section1173(a) 9 of the Social Security Act, as referenced in section 262 from the HIIPA Act of 1996 dealing with data administration.  Also, a time limit, not exceed 42 months (4 years), is stated for compliance. 

An interesting point is a presidential term is four years.  To pull off digital identity at scale, a president would need to fast track the implementation.  It means 5G nationwide coupled with blockchain to create an immutable system of record for wide-scale digital identities.

In an earlier podcast10, I discussed how the FCC approved SpaceX11 on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 5G satellites into low orbit around the Earth. The total number of satellites expected will range from 20K up to 42K by 202712, making digital id a reality. 

section 54313 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290dd–2)

section (a) Requirement

Records of the identity, diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment of any patient which are maintained in connection with the performance of any program or activity relating to substance use disorder education (sickness, illness), prevention, training, treatment, rehabilitation, or research, which is conducted, regulated, or directly or indirectly assisted by any department or agency of the United States shall, except as provided in subsection (e), be confidential and be disclosed only for the purposes and under the circumstances expressly authorized under subsection (b).

section (b) Permitted disclosure

(1) Consent

The following shall apply with respect to the contents of any record referred to in subsection (a):

(A) Such contents may be used or disclosed in accordance with the prior written consent of the patient with respect to whom such record is maintained.

Subsection (B, C) states that once you have given your consent, then anyone defined in this section can use your data now and in the future.  This will include treatments, payments, health care operations, until the patient revokes consent in writing.  But the bill does not define where you send your letter to.

(2) Method for Disclosure

In section (2) titled Method for Disclosure, defines how the data can be used when consent is not given.

Section 2a allows medical personnel only to use the data to meet the need of the medical emergency.  Then in section 2b in addresses what qualified personnel can do.  These individuals are only allowed to use non-identifiable information for scientific research, financial and management audits, and evaluation of the program.  They are not allowed to use any of this data to identify a person directly or indirectly.  Section 2c continues to address the court's power for access in extreme cases for a good cause in the public interest.  This is where the Katz test14 comes into play as well as other privacy tests established by the supreme court case law.   

I will cover this in more detail when I discuss the fourth amendment.

Section 2d focuses on the role of a public health authority as defined under section 164.514(b) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations15 for creating de-identified information.

section 164.514(b) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations15

45 CFR § 164.514 - Other requirements relating to uses and disclosures of protected health information.

(a) Standard: De-identification of protected health information

Mean that the data cannot be used in any way to identify the individual’s health information.

(b) Implementation specifications: Requirements for de-identification

This section is pretty in depth, but in a nutshell the only information they are allowed to use is the year of birth, admission, discharge or date of death. No month or day allowed. Nothing other information can be used that is considered identifiable in this section. The list of comprehensive on what they cannot collect.                               

(c) Implementation specifications: Re-identification

Now to re-identify, a covered entity will use a generated code.  They cannot create the code from data that can identify the individual. In addition, they are not allowed to share how they created the code nor disclose it to anyone.  This is now starting to sound like digital identity plus myPass via blockchain, backed and funded by Bill Gates ID20207 initiative.

section (c) Use of records in criminal, civil, or administrative contexts

Except as otherwise authorized by a court order under subsection (b)(2)(C) or by the consent of the patient, a record referred to in subsection (a), or testimony relaying the information contained therein, may not be disclosed or used in any civil, criminal, administrative, or legislative proceedings conducted by any Federal, State, or local authority, against a patient, including with respect to the following activities:

(1) Such record or testimony shall not be entered into evidence in any criminal prosecution or civil action before a Federal or State court.

(2) Such record or testimony shall not form part of the record for decision or otherwise be taken into account in any proceeding before a Federal, State, or local agency.

(3) Such record or testimony shall not be used by any Federal, State, or local agency for a law enforcement purpose or to conduct any law enforcement investigation.

(4) Such record or testimony shall not be used in any application for a warrant.

WIV Reports — Uncensored is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

References

1.         Bobby L. Rush. H.R.6666. (2020).

2.         Massachusetts Contact Tracing Program Handed to Clinton-Linked NGO with Questionable Past. MintPress News https://www.mintpressnews.com/massachusetts-contact-tracing-partners-in-health-clinton/267534/ (2020).

3.         WATCH, J. Census Bureau Still Hiring Felons, Child Sex Offenders Pass Background Check. Judicial Watch https://www.judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/census-bureau-still-hiring-felons-child-sex-offenders-pass-background-check/ (2019).

4.         COVID-19 Contact Tracing. Coursera https://www.coursera.org/learn/covid-19-contact-tracing?edocomorp=covid-19-contact-tracing.

5.         Event 201. Center for Health Security https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/ (2019).

6.         Medically Underserved Areas and Populations (MUA/Ps). Bureau of Health Workforce https://bhw.hrsa.gov/shortage-designation/muap (2016).

7.         ID2020. Welcome the City of Austin to the ID2020 Alliance! Medium https://medium.com/id2020/welcome-the-city-of-austin-to-the-id2020-alliance-76b0ebe6776 (2019).

8.         STATUTE-110-Pg1936.pdf.

9.         SSA, O. Standards for information transactions and data elements. https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title11/1173.htm#ft246.

10.       5G: A Blessing or a Curse. https://www.buzzsprout.com/906265/3254200-5g-a-blessing-or-a-curse.

11.       THOMAS, J. P. 5G From Space: 20,000 Satellites To Blanket The Earth. Technocracy News https://www.technocracy.news/5g-from-space-20000-satellites-to-blanket-the-earth/ (2019).

12.       McFall-Johnsen, M. SpaceX’s license to launch hundreds of internet satellites may have violated the law, experts say. Astronomers could sue the FCC. Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-starlink-satellite-license-fcc-environmental-law-2020-1 (2020).

13.       [USC02] 42 USC 290dd-2: Confidentiality of records. vol. 42 (2020).

14.       Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 | Casetext Search + Citator. https://casetext.com/case/katz-v-united-states-2.

15.       45 CFR § 164.514 - Other requirements relating to uses and disclosures of protected health information. 164.514.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit walkinverse.substack.com/subscribe

In episode #12, "HR 6666, the Overview," I show the dangers in this bill and share some insight.  This is a multi-part podcast that will dive into 4th Amendment violations and privacy issues surrounding contact tracing.   

Consider Joining

Subscribe to my Free Newsletter and keep current with my new work as it unfolds. Or considered a Paid Subscription and receive access to members only content.

• https://walkinverse.substack.com/

Follow on Telegram

• https://t.me/wivupdates

Support the show