Love Island USA Season 8 has officially ended, and after finally becoming a devoted watcher this summer, I’m breaking down what the show reveals about our culture more broadly. From KC and Corbin’s red-pill-adjacent language to the homosocial bonds that prioritize other men’s approval over the emotional needs of the women they’re coupled with, Love Island is a microcosm of today’s gender dynamics and dating culture.

Fair warning: spoilers ahead. And as always... MelaniEEEEEE!

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

Everyone seems to own an Oura Ring these days, and that’s only one part of the equation. From Apple Watches and Whoop bands to emerging hormone trackers, wearable devices are becoming an everyday part of how we understand our bodies.

In this episode, I explore why wearable health has taken off and what it reveals about broader cultural shifts in wellness. As people become more health-literate, we’re increasingly drawn to holistic health practices that treat the body as an interconnected system. Wearables fit perfectly into that mindset, offering continuous data on everything, like sleep, stress, recovery, and activity.

That said, more information doesn’t always mean better self-understanding. I also reflect on my own experience with data fatigue after wearing an Oura Ring and why relying too heavily on metrics can sometimes cloud our assessment of our bodies.

Finally, the health wearables industry is only growing. Excitingly, there is a growing focus on women’s health and hormone-tracking technology—hooray, something to celebrate!

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

When was the last time you read an article from start to finish? Or listened to an entire podcast episode? Instead of consuming long-form content, we are increasingly gravitating toward short clips extracted from longer pieces—and, in many cases, abandoning those longer works altogether. Known as the “clip economy,” I explore how the dominance of short-form video is transforming the media industry.

Legacy media organizations like The New York Times are adapting to these changing habits by embracing TikTok-style vertical videos. They’re also recognizing the growing influence of personality-driven content: reporters are building audiences around their own identities rather than relying solely on institutional credibility. Even Spotify now puts its editors on camera for New Music Friday.

As institutions start to behave like creators, and TikTok-style vertical videos continue to dominate, I ask: What does this mean for the future of media?

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

Usually, by June 1st, my feed is already flooded with corporate rainbow logos and Pride collections (they’re never very cute, sorry to say). That isn’t quite the case this year.

At a moment when queer and trans rights are increasingly under attack, corporate support for the LGBTQ+ community has noticeably declined. In this episode, I explore why corporations have pulled back. Perhaps, for better or for worse, we’re finally witnessing the death of rainbow capitalism.

At the same time, parts of queer culture have become more mainstream than ever. Think: people adopting queer language and humor (why does everyoneee know what “DL trade” is?), Heated Rivalry, etc etc. As generic Pride campaigns are exposed for their performativity, the brands that still resonate are engaging with queer culture in more culturally fluent ways. Finally, I reflect on how I’ll be celebrating Pride this year—and why supporting queer community matters far more than buying a polyester rainbow T-shirt!

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

From the Knicks’ championship (go NYC!) to the Monaco Grand Prix and the upcoming World Cup, it feels like everyone—not just lifelong fans—is paying attention to sports. Why?

In this episode, I argue that one overlooked reason is the return of the WAG. Once dismissed as tabloid side characters, today’s wives and girlfriends of athletes have become influential figures in their own right. WAGs like Alexandra Saint Mleux, Jordyn Woods, and Kristin Juszczyk are building brands, shaping fashion trends, and bringing entirely new audiences into sports. They’re also making professional athletes feel more relatable than ever before.

Ultimately, the modern WAG has become an important part of the business of sports itself. As sports and fashion continue to converge, the WAGs sitting courtside may only grow in cultural importance. Let’s see how the World Cup shakes out, shall we?

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

Weddings are everywhere right now. Dua Lipa and Callum Turner. Ming Xi and Mario Ho. Venus Williams and Andrea Preti. And don’t forget the recent wave of high-profile engagements: Zendaya and Tom Holland, Zoë Kravitz and Harry Styles, Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift.

With every new wedding comes endless discussion of the dress, the venue, and the guest list. Increasingly, I’ve noticed that the conversation around weddings focuses as much on the aesthetic and curatorial choices a couple makes as it does on the couple themselves—myself included, guilty as charged.

In this episode, I ask whether celebrity culture and social media have fundamentally shifted our understanding of weddings. In the age of social media, weddings increasingly function as displays of cultural capital. Every decision, however small, communicates something about taste (shoutout to sociologist Pierre Bourdieu!) and, by extension, social position.

Is the wedding still about love? Or has it become a cultural performance for an audience of millions? Could it perhaps be both?

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

I grew up with Euphoria. I watched season one as a high school sophomore experimenting with colorful eye shadow, season two while waiting on college decisions, and season three just a few days after graduating from college. In many ways, the show’s timeline mirrored my own.

In this episode, I unpack my complicated feelings about the show’s third season. I explore what feels like a growing misogynistic portrayal of women and how its female characters have lost much of the agency and complexity that once made them compelling. As this season’s shock value increasingly relies on the exploitation of women, I ask: Do these “fictional” portrayals reflect larger cultural and political shifts happening in the real world? What do the rise of trad-wife culture and the rollback of women’s rights have to do with Euphoria?

And yet, despite all of my criticisms, I still finished the show. Why? Maybe we stay attached to certain pieces of media long after we’ve outgrown them because they’re tied to a particular version of ourselves. So, let's talk Euphoria!

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

Celebrity brands are everywhere right now. Every week, there’s a new skincare line, makeup launch, wellness drink, or fashion collaboration attached to a famous face. But while some brands like Rhode, Rare Beauty, and Fenty Beauty become genuinely culture-shifting companies, most celebrity brands disappear soon after they launch.

In this episode, I explore what actually makes celebrity brands work today. A celebrity name undoubtedly generates first-time purchases. It creates curiosity and gets people talking online. But in today’s world, as consumers are becoming increasingly literate about branding, fame alone is no longer enough. People can now sense when a brand feels culturally embedded versus manufactured, and that shift is reshaping the future of celebrity brands. How can a celebrity brand really, truly gain and sustain cultural relevance?

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

Earlier this week, reports surfaced that Everlane was being acquired by Shein for $100 million. Everlane is built on the promises of “radical transparency” and sustainability; Shein, on the other hand, is the epitome of fast fashion.

The Everlane-to-Shein pipeline exposes the limits of ethical consumption under capitalism. It highlights the contradictions inherent to sustainable fashion: true sustainability would require people to buy less, but businesses and investors depend on constant growth.

In this episode, I unpack how Everlane became symbolic of a very specific 2010s cultural moment, shaped by Obama-era optimism, in which consumers believed brands could create social change through “better” purchasing decisions. But in today’s more politically cynical climate, many sustainable brands are struggling to survive. What happens when brands built around ethics are forced to survive amidst the pressures of constant growth?

Subscribe for more!

New episodes every Thursday. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe on Substack for written notes on culture and to get new episodes delivered straight to your inbox.

Have ideas, questions, or something you want me to dig into? Send them my way at [email protected] or message me on Substack!

As I’m about to graduate, I’ve been reflecting on my senior thesis on neo-Chinese fashion—a style that blends traditional Chinese design with modern, everyday wear. Think: the viral adidas Chinese New Year jackets, qipaos modified for comfort, and shirts with pankou buttons. In this episode, I ask a simple question: why is it becoming so popular right now?

I break down how neo-Chinese fashion is tied to China’s growing soft power, where a country’s presence on the international stage is reflected in culture and in what people come to see as desirable. You can see this even online, in trends like “I’m at a very Chinese time of my life.” At the same time, dissatisfaction and political uncertainty in the U.S. are pushing people to look outward, with China positioned as an alternative cultural reference point. Here, fashion reflects a shifting geopolitical moment in which global power shapes what we find worth wearing.