Woda miejscami już przesiąka poza koryto.

14:30 będzie kolejne nagranie - główna fala właśnie się zaczyna

In this episode, I have used a transcript (allegedly) from an actual court case. The names have been removed and only "Mr. Smith" has been used in some places to denote a borrower for a loan.

The first part takes you through what was said and the second half discusses the possible laws which can be used to validate the claims of the alleged "creditor"

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/observation

Links used in this episode are as follows in the order they appeared in the episode:

The truth in lending act 1968

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977: https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings/fair-debt-collection-practices-act-text

Title 18 of us criminal code: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I (Use this link to go to the code sections shown in the video)

Take a close look at Code § 2319.Criminal infringement of copyright (Title 18 subsection 2319)

UCC code "Holder in due course": https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-302

MONEY OF ACCOUNT of the UNITED STATES: http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=147

The UK Based "The Bernician" website: https://www.thebernician.net/banking-crimes/

Niesamowity wywiad z Catherine Austin Fitts z grudnia 2020 r.