YesToHellWith

It is April 22. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

I want to take a moment to address something that happened last night.

The “Yes to Hell With” Facebook page was suspended.

The notice indicated a six-month suspension, with an option to appeal.

Now, I don’t pretend to be an expert in technology or social media. So after a brief discussion with the person who assists with the account, I followed the instructions and submitted the requested information.

And almost immediately—the account was reinstated.

So what does that tell you?

It tells you that these platforms operate in a way that is, at best, inconsistent… and at worst, arbitrary.

One moment, you are removed.

The next moment, you are restored.

No real explanation. No real accountability.

Now, I’m not going to speculate beyond that.

But I will say this—

When a platform has the power to remove your voice instantly, and then restore it just as quickly, it should cause you to think carefully about where you place your reliance.

Because Facebook, like TikTok, like other platforms, is simply a vehicle.

It is not the foundation.

It is a tool.

And tools can be taken away.

Now let me also address something else.

The purpose of this platform—of everything we are doing—is not mass marketing.

It is not funnels.

It is not aggressive sales tactics.

Yes, there are books.

Yes, there are materials.

But the objective is not to reach millions of passive consumers.

The objective is to reach a core group of individuals who are serious.

Serious about understanding.

Serious about learning.

Serious about addressing what is actually wrong.

Because what we are discussing—what we are building—is not something that has been taught in any meaningful way.

And it requires effort.

It requires attention.

It requires discipline.

So if someone is here simply to scroll, or to be entertained—

This is not for them.

But for those who want to understand structure…
who want to understand authority…
who want to understand how things actually function—

Then this is exactly where you need to be.

Now, as we move forward, there will be a greater emphasis on platforms that allow for deeper engagement.

Substack will be one of those platforms.

Interviews.

Podcasts.

Live discussions.

More interaction.

More substance.

Because ultimately, that is where real understanding develops.

Now, one final point.

I do not place much weight on follower counts.

Numbers can be inflated.

Numbers can be manipulated.

What matters is engagement.

What matters is who is actually paying attention.

And if a small group of people truly understands what is being presented—

That is far more powerful than a large group that does not.

So with that said—

The Facebook page is active.

We will continue to use it as a tool.

But it is not the foundation.

Now, there will be a live Liberty Dialogues video conference call this Thursday evening at 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

It is April 21st.

Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

A few important announcements.

First—

There will be a Liberty Dialogues video conference call tonight.

The focus of this call is simple and powerful:

How to use the Liberty Dialogues… with AI… and ChatGPT.

If you have the SOU4U package, you are invited to attend.

If you are a veteran of these calls and would like to invite a personal friend or family member, send an email to:

[email protected]

Include their name.

And if you have the SOU4U package and want access to tonight’s call, send an email as well so we can get you set up.

Second—

The statementofunderstanding.com website addresses two critical components:

The Statement of Understanding itself…

And the Good Faith Belief series of letters.

These letters are designed to be sent to senators, congressmen, and agencies—

To establish your good faith belief…

Before you ever find yourself in a position where that belief matters most.

When you order the material, just like with the Liberty Dialogues—

Check your spam or junk folder.

That is often where the files land.

Third—

The response to the Oath and Bond series of videos has been tremendous.

Frankly, it has generated more engagement than anything we’ve posted.

And that tells me something very important:

People are beginning to see.

Because of that—

I am inviting anyone who has personal experience—

Success…

Failure…

Or insight—

As it relates to oaths and bonds…

Send your observations to:

info@yestohellwith.com

I am going to compile an in-depth report—

On securing oaths and bonds—

And I will share that with everyone.

Finally—

This is for those of you in Australia.

If you would like me to hold a regular call for the Liberty Dialogues calls—

Focused specifically on issues in Australia—

Send an email to:

info@yestohellwith.com

Or message through social media.

I will gather names…

Form a group…

We are building something.

And it is growing.

Stay engaged.

Stay focused.

And continue doing the work.

And as always—

May truth reign supreme.

It is April 21st.

Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

Last night we were blessed—once again—with the anointed words of Mr. Wayne.

And since I’ve committed to no longer address him directly, I’m going to do something far more valuable.

I’m going to use his example…

As a Master Class—

On what not to do, and who not to be.

And I’m speaking directly to you.

The good people who watch these videos all over the world.

Because this is not about one man.

It is about a posture.

A very common posture.

The posture of a follower of a guru—someone who believes what he wishes… without ever doing the work to understand it.

And that posture…

Is exactly what gets people destroyed in courts and administrative venues.

So let’s break it down.

First—Due diligence.

When someone speaks with certainty… but has not:

read the material

reviewed the record

studied the documents

or understood the framework

What are they doing?

They are not analyzing.

They are reacting.

This is the hallmark of a follower.

They hear something.

They latch onto it.

And they repeat it—without ever asking:

“Do I actually understand this?”

And if you walk into a courtroom with that posture—

You will be dismantled.

Because the system does not respond to your confidence.

It responds to your preparation.

Second—Outcome versus record.

The follower says:

“He lost. Therefore, he was wrong.”

That is the thinking of someone who has never examined how outcomes are produced.

Courts do not operate on slogans.

They operate on:

procedure

admissibility

preservation of issues

and what is allowed into the record

If you don’t understand that—

You are not equipped to challenge anything.

You are simply accepting outcomes as truth.

And that is exactly what the system depends on.

Third—Misuse of case law.

You hear:

“Cheek says this…”

And suddenly—that’s the end of the discussion.

That is not legal reasoning.

That is parroting.

The follower takes a case…

Strips it of context…

And uses it to avoid deeper inquiry.

But real understanding requires asking:

What does the case actually address?

What does it not address?

How does it apply—and how does it not apply?

If you don’t ask those questions—

You’re not using the law.

You’re hiding behind it.

Fourth—Authority without analysis.

The follower says:

“Authority comes from statutes.”

And stops there.

That sounds intelligent.

But it’s incomplete.

Because authority must be:

invoked

applied

and connected

And that connection requires understanding:

Jurisdiction.

If you don’t understand jurisdiction—

You don’t understand authority.

And if you walk into any venue assuming authority instead of examining it—

You will lose.

Every time.

Fifth—Failure to demand answers.

This is critical.

When a man asks:

“What law requires me to act?”

And the system refuses to answer—

What does the follower do?

He ignores the question.

He skips over it.

And he says:

“Well, the law exists.”

But that’s not the issue.

The issue is:

Was the question answered?

Was the obligation clarified?

Was the connection made?

If you don’t demand those answers—

You are not engaging the system.

You are submitting to it.

Sixth—Presumption.

The follower operates on one belief:

“If the system said it… it must be correct.”

That is presumption.

And presumption is the foundation of compliance.

Not truth.

Not understanding.

Compliance.

The Liberty Dialogues exists to break that cycle:

Presumption → Inquiry → Understanding → Action

But if you stay in presumption—

You never move.

Seventh—and most important—Posture.

Mr. Wayne’s posture is not unique.

It is common.

It is the posture of someone who wants to be heard…

Without first seeking to understand.

The posture of someone who wants validation…

Without doing the work required to earn it.

And here is the warning to you:

If you adopt that posture—

If you follow someone who speaks with certainty but without depth—

If you repeat conclusions without understanding process—

Then when you enter a courtroom…

When you face an agency…

When your rights are actually on the line—

You will be treated exactly as you have trained yourself to behave:

Dismissed.

Overruled.

Defeated.

So what is the solution?

Not mine.

Not his.

Not anyone’s packaged answer.

The solution is this:

You must ask questions.

You must demand clarity.

You must understand structure.

You must know process.

And you must be willing to stand in that understanding—

Even when it is uncomfortable.

Even when it is challenged.

Even when the outcome is uncertain.

Because a man who understands…

Is very different from a man who believes what he wishes.

One acts.

The other reacts.

So before you follow anyone—

Before you adopt any position—

Before you speak with certainty—

Ask yourself:

Have I done the work?

Do I understand the system?

Or am I simply repeating what I’ve heard?

Because that answer…

Will determine everything that follows.

The Liberty Dialogues is not about giving you answers.

It is about teaching you how to ask the right questions—

So that truth becomes unavoidable.

Walk that path.

And as always—

May truth reign supreme.

It is April 20th.

Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

Oftentimes, we have a sense—deep down—that something is wrong.

We feel it.
We see it.
We experience it.

But we cannot quite articulate it.

There’s a syndrome… an atmosphere… a condition… and we know it exists—but we don’t yet understand how and why it came to be that way.

And that is a dangerous place for a people to live.

Because if you cannot define the problem… you cannot defeat it.

So let’s define it.

What is this syndrome?

It is the convergence of three conditions:

An ignorance among the people of the structure they live under.
A presumption of authority by the institutions that govern.
And a habitual compliance by the people themselves.

Ignorance… presumption… compliance.

That is the cycle.

And that cycle repeats—year after year—until it is challenged.

But once you begin to dig—once you start ferreting through the ins and outs, the ups and downs, and the arounds of it—you begin to see it.

Maybe not perfectly… but clearly enough.

And once you can see it… you can speak it.

And once you can speak it… you can act on it.

Let me give you an example.

Congress.

Congress, as it operates today, reflects a failure of understanding—both among those elected and those doing the electing.

Now ask yourself—

Why do we keep electing individuals who do not demonstrate a working understanding of the system they are governing?

Why do so many people not even recognize it?

Because the American people, broadly speaking, do not understand the system they are participating in.

Ignorance elects ignorance.

And ignorance in office governs through presumption.

A presumption that you will cooperate.

A presumption that you will comply.

A presumption that you will graduate right along with their agenda.

Left versus right?

That’s smoke and mirrors.

Because Congress moves forward no matter who is in control—and it advances its agenda, not yours.

And here is the deeper structural failure:

Congress looks up.

It looks up to federal power structures.

It looks inward—for self-promotion, advancement, and position.

But it does not look out…

And it does not look down…

At the American people.

A true representative looks outward.

A true representative looks downward—broadly—at the people and says:

“I serve them.”

Until that changes, nothing changes.

Now look at the courts.

The courts function, in large part, as a high-throughput administrative process.

A conveyor belt.

And why does it work?

Because we accept it.

We pay the fine.

We move on.

We say, “that’s just the system.”

No.

That is not the system operating correctly.

That is ignorance feeding the system.

We do not know our rights.

We do not understand process.

We do not assert due process.

And because of that—we capitulate.

So what is the point?

The point is this:

At some point, you must become aware.

You must observe.

You must know.

You must understand.

And then—you must apply wisdom.

Because when you defeat your own ignorance…

You begin to force the system to operate within its own limits.

And when enough people do that…

Everything changes.

Understand the mechanism:

Ignorance → presumption → compliance → reinforcement.

Break that cycle—and the system changes.

Now consider a practical example.

When 50 to 100 individuals in a jurisdiction demand jury trials, the system experiences immediate strain:

Docket congestion.
Prosecutorial overload.
Resource limitations.

Cases begin to stall.

Some are dismissed.

The system does not collapse—but it is forced to operate within its actual capacity.

This is not theory.

This is process.

Why does this happen?

Because individuals stop cooperating blindly.

They begin understanding.

They begin asserting.

That is power.

That is restoration.

That is how a free people becomes free again.

Now understand something else.

There will always be noise.

There will always be those who snap, yap, and bark without ever taking the time to understand what is being said.

Names like Bradley Allen.

Names like Christopher Wayne.

They criticize without comprehension.

They dismiss without inquiry.

They want you to look at them—to follow them—to believe they have the answer.

But they are a distraction.

This is not about following.

This is about understanding.

The Liberty Dialogues is not about me.

It is not about any one man.

It is a framework.

A pathway.

A construct rooted in truth.

It teaches you how the system actually works—so you can work within it and force it to operate within its proper limits.

And more importantly—

It shifts the burden.

From the individual defending himself…

To the system proving its authority.

Now listen carefully—

Because this is where most people stop.

Like many of you, I believe I have a solution.

A real solution.

It is not political—it is procedural.

It is not violent—it is structural.

It does not destroy the system—it forces the system to confront itself.

It is simple.

It is powerful.

And it is profoundly counterintuitive.

So much so…

That it may be resisted at all costs.

Someone—or some people—may even lose their life in the process of it coming to light.

But from that moment—

There will be an uproar.

An uproar unlike anything we have seen in a long time in this country.

And the American people will rise—not in confusion—but in clarity.

And they will say:

“No. This cannot be.”

“You will not trump the solution.”

“You will not circumvent the one path that restores our freedom and our natural-born rights.”

That is what happens when people finally see.

That is what happens when ignorance is defeated.

But it requires something of you.

It requires that you look beyond yourself.

It requires that you think in terms of 100 years… 500 years into the future.

What is practical?

What is necessary?

What must be done to ensure that freedom is not just remembered—but restored?

There are solutions.

I have a solution.

And it begins with understanding.

It begins with awareness.

It begins with the Liberty Dialogues.

This is how we reverse the process.

This is how we stop looking up at power…

And start looking out—across—and down at the people.

This is how we restore a once-free people.

So do not begin with conclusions—begin with questions.

Do not begin with resistance—begin with understanding.

And do not begin by looking up—

Begin by examining the structure itself.

The Liberty Dialogues is the path.

Walk it.

And as always—

May truth reign supreme.

It is April 20th. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.

We have now completed this series on oaths and bonds.

What have we learned?

We learned that authority should never be presumed. We learned that an oath is the promise. We learned that a bond is the accountability. We learned that records matter.

The Liberty Dialogues does not teach people to make reckless accusations. It teaches people to ask disciplined questions.

Where is the oath? Where is the bond? Where is the proof of authority?

Because the system depends upon your silence. It depends upon your assumption. It depends upon your willingness to believe that title alone creates power.

But title is not proof. Appearance is not proof. Prestige is not proof.

Proof is proof.

And if an official claims authority over your life, your liberty, your property, or your money, then you have every right to require evidence that the official lawfully qualified for that authority.

The most dangerous thing to a presumptive system is not anger. It is not rebellion.

It is a citizen with records.

A citizen who asks the right questions. A citizen who preserves the answers. A citizen who understands that the burden of proving authority belongs to the one who claims it.

And as always, may truth reign supreme.

Are Judges and Prosecutors Really Bonded?
It is April 19th. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.
Many people assume that judges and prosecutors are above this process.
They are not.
They may not always have an individual bond, but they are often covered by: - Blanket policies - Judicial risk pools - State insurance funds - Professional liability programs
So ask for the records.
Send the request to: - Court administration - State administrative office - County risk management office - State treasurer
Ask specifically:
“Please identify any bond, blanket bond, liability coverage, risk pool, or financial protection applicable to Judge Smith or Prosecutor Jones during the period from January 1, 2025 through present.”
Again, we are not relying on assumptions.
We are creating a record.
Because even the most powerful official depends upon one thing:
Presumption.
And when you challenge presumption with documentation, the entire conversation changes.

It is April 18. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. Mr. Wayne, you are missing the point because you are treating this video as though it were a law-school lecture.
It is not.
This video was made for ordinary Americans—people who have never read a Supreme Court case, never studied constitutional limits, and have spent their lives being told one thing:
“Do not ask questions. Just obey.”
The purpose of the Liberty Dialogues is not to teach people that government is always wrong. The purpose is to teach people that government is not automatically right.
You say the answer is the Constitution, statutes, and judicial decisions. Fine. Then people have every right to ask:
What part of the Constitution? Which statute? Which regulation? Which case? And what are the limits?
That is not fantasy. That is the beginning of legal analysis.
The problem is that Americans encounter officials in the hundreds of thousands every day. Police officers. Code enforcement. Tax agencies. Judges. Clerks. Administrative boards. Licensing departments.
And far too often, those officials do not stay within the actual borders of the law, the ordinance, the regulation, or even the court ruling they claim to enforce.
Instead, they presume. They expand. They improvise. They act as though their opinion or office policy is the law.

A police officer claims authority the statute does not grant. An agency creates rules that do not exist. A judge ignores the actual limits of a law and rules according to preference, politics, or convenience.
And yes, courts do this too. Courts have often been wrong. They upheld segregation. They upheld internment. They have expanded government power far beyond what earlier generations believed possible. And later courts have reversed them.
So please do not pretend that asking questions is somehow improper. If courts can question prior courts, then the people can question officials.
The Liberty Dialogues framework is simple:
Authority. Jurisdiction. Status. Standing. Obligation. Enforcement.
Most of the modern system begins at the end—with enforcement—and assumes that all the earlier questions have already been answered.
The Liberty Dialogues say: No. Ask the earlier questions first.
By what authority? What are its limits? To whom does it apply? Has the official exceeded those limits?
That is not radical. That is what a free people are supposed to do.
What is most revealing about your criticism is the tone. You did not ask questions. You did not seek clarification. You simply walked into a lesson intended for ordinary people and announced that it was wrong.
That reflects a kind of presumptive arrogance—the same arrogance many Americans encounter every day from officials who assume that because they wear a badge, hold an office, or sit on a bench, they no longer need to explain themselves.
The video is not for appellate judges. It is not for law professors. And it is not for people who believe that authority never has to justify itself.
It is for ordinary Americans who need to understand one simple truth:
Government in America is supposed to be limited. Officials are supposed to stay within those limits. And the people have every right to ask where those limits come from.
Because the real problem in America is not that too many people ask questions.
The real problem is that too few do.

It is April 18th. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.

Many people ask: can I make a claim against the bond?

Sometimes, yes.

But you must understand the difference between: - A complaint - A lawsuit - A claim against the bond

A bond claim is usually made directly to the surety company.

You identify: - The official - The office - The bond number - The misconduct - The damages

Then you send notice.

For example:

“Please accept this as notice of claim against Bond Number 12345 issued for John Smith, Sheriff of Page County. On April 1, 2026, Sheriff Smith seized my property without lawful authority. Attached are the records, correspondence, and damages.”

Do not exaggerate. Do not become emotional.

Facts. Dates. Documents.

The Liberty Dialogues teaches that the strongest claim is not the loudest claim. It is the best documented claim.

And remember:

The bond company may not want to pay. But they may also not want a claim history.

That gives you leverage.

This video is for April 18th. Welcome to Yes to hell with.com. There will be an inner circle call this evening as announced by email and Patriot members are invited to attend. We will be discussing the curriculum about language, words, definitions, meanings, and posture. I encourage you to attend this call.

If you're not able to make it. I will have a recording and I will post it on the membership page of yes to hell with.com. If you are interested in taking this course, then go to Yes to hell with.com and become an Inner Circle or Patriot member. Now tomorrow we will have a Liberty Dialogues video call on how to use the.

Liberty Dialogues Framework with chat GPT or ai. This will be Saturday morning, the 11:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. This is a very powerful call. Once you get the SOU for you package. I discuss how to use the Liberty dialogues with ai and then we go live on my computer and we look at examples. I'm gonna be inviting Chief Blue Mahi to the call tomorrow because I have some of his letters that I'd like to share with his commentary along with me.

He's got letters prepared for the IRS or a case with Louisiana, both of them and AI Chat. GBT has stated that his record is stronger. Than the agencies. It does not mean that the presumptive system is gonna cave and give him a win, but it does show the power of the Liberty dialogues and the work that he is doing by himself after he went through my sessions and he is doing excellent work.

So I invite you to get the SOU for you package. If you are international, just get the Liberty Dialogues international package. And you are permitted to attend the calls. These are very, very informative and eye-opening calls and I really believe that, not even personally myself, I, I don’t realize the power of the Liberty dialogues and I’m not overselling it.

I just, I think it’s a valuable tool and I think we can cripple the legal industry by using these kinds of platforms. The Liberty Dialogues platform. To prepare our own defenses and our own actions and our own suits. Now, as a final notice, the statement of understanding.com is online and people are ordering this comprehensive defense against a cataclysmic crisis like I went through with the IRS.

If you want to and need to prepare your good faith defense. And establish a statement of understanding and document it for future reference. This is vital. It comes with two components, the understanding that you write and the series of good faith belief letters that you send to senators and congressmen and agencies compelling them to respond so that you actually have a track record to substantiate your good faith beliefs.

And that’s it. I’ll see you tonight on the Inner Circle and Patriot Call. And as always, may truth reign Supreme.

It is April 17th. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.

We now arrive at the final question.

What are we witnessing?

The answer is simple.

We are witnessing the restoration of sight.

For a long time, Americans have lived inside a kind of fog.

They have been taught that government is naturally entitled to regulate almost everything. They have been taught that if a law exists, it must be lawful. They have been taught that if something has been enforced for decades, it must therefore be constitutional.

But that is not true.

The home distilling case shows us that a false idea can exist for 158 years and still be false.

Wickard shows us how a narrow power can become an unlimited power.

Modern federal enforcement often assumes that because government may tax something, government therefore owns it, controls it, or may prohibit it.

But the Constitution does not work that way.

The people come first. Government comes second.

That is the first principle.

And when courts begin to remember that, something extraordinary happens.

The old assumptions begin to crack.

The idea that government may regulate every act inside the home begins to weaken. The idea that labor is merely a government-granted privilege begins to weaken. The idea that survival itself may be controlled begins to weaken.

Perhaps in the near future, appellate courts and even the Supreme Court will begin to recognize that some forms of modern enforcement have gone too far.

They may eventually say:

Yes, Congress may tax where the Constitution allows. But Congress may not use that taxing power as a substitute for unlimited control over private life.

When that day comes, people will look back and realize that the system had drifted very far from first principles.

And they will ask how we ever accepted it.

The restoration of first principles is not rebellion. It is not extremism. It is not chaos.

It is simply remembering what was always true.

That freedom is presumed. That authority must be proven. That government is limited. And that the people are not subjects.

The most important question in America is still the simplest one:

By what authority?

When the people begin asking that question again, clearly, calmly, and without fear, then freedom begins to return.

Because the greatest victory is not merely winning a case.

The greatest victory is helping people see again.