YesToHellWith

Subscribe now

Standing is the legal right and power to challenge

Subscribe now

the government and demand proof of authority. It recognizes that your rights, liberty, property, or status are directly affected. In simple terms, standing gives you the lawful position to say: “Prove your authority. Prove your jurisdiction. Or you have no power over me.” Standing is grounded in: • status • domicile • consent • nexus —not government permission. Once standing is asserted: • the burden shifts to government • jurisdiction must be proven • authority must be justified • constitutional limits apply This is why the system fears standing. Because standing forces government to stay within its lawful boundaries. Standing is not a rumor. It is your birthright.

Subscribe now

Tomorrow or on Saturday

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

, I will be making a significant posting here. And it is for those of you who have been supportive of my efforts. It will be highly instructive. I will be spending a lot of time on it the next two days. So I may not post anything tomorrow. Until then, may truth reign supreme.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

Some people are STILL saying “criminal statutes don’t need regulations.” Let’s fix that. A criminal statute may stand alone… but enforcement authority NEVER does. No federal employee can enforce anything without THREE things: 1—Statutory jurisdiction 2—Delegated authority 3—Regulations saying who can enforce it and on whom That’s why ATF uses 27 CFR… ICE uses 8 CFR… FDA uses 21 CFR… OSHA uses 29 CFR… EVERY agency needs regs to enforce anything. Except the IRS. For income-tax “crimes” like 7203, 7201, 7212 — there are zero implementing regulations giving IRS Criminal Investigation authority under Title 26. Zero. And that silence is louder than every argument. May truth reign supreme.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

When we hear about rape, robbery, or a home invasion, we all react the same way: Evil must be stopped. No man would allow a criminal to harm his family. So why do we tolerate a federal government that violates our rights, invades our jurisdiction, and steals the labor of a free people — without ever proving lawful authority? When I was a boy, I watched two thugs steal a young kid’s winter coat. I wanted to help. I should have helped. But I froze. I didn’t open the door. I’ve carried that moment ever since. And today, 60–70% of the people watching my videos are men. That matters. It tells me men still know responsibility. Men still feel the call to protect what is right. Men still know when a line has been crossed. If we would never allow criminals to harm our families, then we cannot allow the federal government to harm our Republic. This is the moment to open the door. This is the moment to say NO MORE. This is the moment to defend America.

Subscribe now

When we hear about rape, robbery, or a home invasion

Subscribe now

, we all react the same way: Evil must be stopped. No man would allow a criminal to harm his family. So why do we tolerate a federal government that violates our rights, invades our jurisdiction, and steals the labor of a free people — without ever proving lawful authority? When I was a boy, I watched two thugs steal a young kid’s winter coat. I wanted to help. I should have helped. But I froze. I didn’t open the door. I’ve carried that moment ever since. And today, 60–70% of the people watching my videos are men. That matters. It tells me men still know responsibility. Men still feel the call to protect what is right. Men still know when a line has been crossed. If we would never allow criminals to harm our families, then we cannot allow the federal government to harm our Republic. This is the moment to open the door. This is the moment to say NO MORE. This is the moment to defend America.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

Most Americans have no idea the IRS has its own internal rulebook — the IRM. And buried inside it is the line they never want you to see. IRM 9.1.3.3 says: “Criminal Investigation’s authority comes from delegated authority.” So if there’s no delegation? There’s no authority. And if there’s no authority? There’s no jurisdiction. Now look at the two statutes they use to prosecute Americans. Section 7203 — willful failure to file. There is no regulation. No delegation. Nothing. Section 7212 — obstruction. The PTAR maps it only to 27 CFR — alcohol, tobacco, firearms excise taxes… not income tax, not private citizens. That means CID prosecutes without the lawful authority the IRM requires. Their own manual exposes them. The Liberty Dialogues reveal the truth. Your Statement of Understanding protects you. May truth reign supreme

Subscribe now

Most Americans have no idea the IRS has its own internal rulebook

Subscribe now

— the IRM. And buried inside it is the line they never want you to see. IRM 9.1.3.3 says: “Criminal Investigation’s authority comes from delegated authority.” So if there’s no delegation? There’s no authority. And if there’s no authority? There’s no jurisdiction. Now look at the two statutes they use to prosecute Americans. Section 7203 — willful failure to file. There is no regulation. No delegation. Nothing. Section 7212 — obstruction. The PTAR maps it only to 27 CFR — alcohol, tobacco, firearms excise taxes… not income tax, not private citizens. That means CID prosecutes without the lawful authority the IRM requires. Their own manual exposes them. The Liberty Dialogues reveal the truth. Your Statement of Understanding protects you. May truth reign supreme

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

I was prosecuted under two tax crimes — 7203 and 7212 — but here’s the truth the jury never heard: • The regulation for 7203 does not exist. • And 7212 is not an income-tax law — the gov’s own PTAR maps it to 27 CFR, the code for alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. No regulation = no delegated authority. No delegated authority = no legal duty. And without a legal duty… there is no crime. The IRS wins by hiding the missing delegation and suppressing the PTAR in court. The Liberty Dialogues expose it. Your Statement of Understanding protects you. May truth reign supreme.

Subscribe now

I was prosecuted under two tax crimes

Subscribe now

— 7203 and 7212 — but here’s the truth the jury never heard: • The regulation for 7203 does not exist. • And 7212 is not an income-tax law — the gov’s own PTAR maps it to 27 CFR, the code for alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. No regulation = no delegated authority. No delegated authority = no legal duty. And without a legal duty… there is no crime. The IRS wins by hiding the missing delegation and suppressing the PTAR in court. The Liberty Dialogues expose it. Your Statement of Understanding protects you. May truth reign supreme.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

There’s a government document the IRS hopes you never discover. It’s called the PTAR — the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules. It shows which federal statutes actually have regulations behind them. Hold the PTAR up to the Internal Revenue Code… and the IRS collapses. 26 U.S.C. §7203 – Failure to File The IRS prosecutes Americans under it every day. But the PTAR shows: • No regulation • No delegation • No jurisdiction over private citizens in the 50 States The statute has no regulatory foundation. 26 U.S.C. §7212 – Obstruction The PTAR maps it only to 27 CFR — excise-tax rules for alcohol, tobacco & firearms.

Subscribe now