Genesis 12-25
5. The Impossible Command Dan Bidwell, Senior Pastor
Genesis 22:1-14 13 March 2022
As somebody relatively new to the United States, I love learning new things about your history and culture.
Now you probably learned this in Elementary School, but I just learned this week about the Jefferson Bible.
Some background about Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson was the third president of the United States, and the principal author of the Declaration of Independence. He was highly educated, having studied mathematics, metaphysics and philosophy at the College of William and Mary in Virginia. Just a few years later he was admitted to the Virginia bar, where he pursued reforms to slavery. Jefferson was well read in English classics and political works, history, religion, ethics and a number of areas of science, including agriculture. He was also an accomplished architect, and musician.
But this is what I learned only this week: Jefferson also authored his own version of the Bible, the New Testament anyway.
Jefferson was a great admirer of Jesus, but as a philosopher and modernist, he couldn’t abide by the idea of Jesus as divine. And so in the years after his presidency, Jefferson started to curate his own version of the Bible. Using a razor and glue, he selected the parts of Jesus’ life that made sense to him as a rationalist. He kept Jesus’ birth but got rid of the angels. He kept Jesus’ teachings, but discarded almost all the miracles. His account ends with Jesus buried in a tomb, and no resurrection.
Jefferson called his book: The Life and Morals of Jesus, and apparently, he read it most nights before bed.
Now why do I bring this up?
Well I think many people have a Jeffersonian attitude when it comes to the Bible. There are parts we like, and we choose to read them. And there are parts that we don’t like and so we ignore them – functionally it’s the same as cutting them out of the Bible with a razor.
But some people go further. They find certain parts of the Bible so problematic that they throw the entire book away. And today’s Bible passage is one of those passages. In my own family, I have a family member who says that the story we’re going to read today is the reason why she could never be a Christian. She just finds it too challenging.
So what I want to do is to look at the story and share some tools for understanding difficult parts of the Bible. That way, when we come across other challenging
1
sections, we’ll have a way of approaching it that helps us to look for the deeper meaning.
So why don’t we pray, and ask God to help us as we open this challenging passage?
Our heavenly Father, please help us to see clearly today as we open this part of your Holy Scriptures. Give us minds that understand and hearts that are ready to learn. Show us the beauty of the plans and promises you have for us. In Jesus’ name we pray. Amen
So we are in the middle of our Old Testament series following the story of Abraham and God’s promises to him. We have been working our way through Genesis 12-25 over the last month or so. And the story really started when God called Abraham out of the land of his father, and called him to go to a land that God would show him.
Here’s where we give the little pop quiz. God made three promises to Abraham back in chapter 12. Do you remember what they were?
Land, Nation and Blessing.
God promised to give Abraham a land, the area that we now know as Israel. God promised to make Abraham into a great nation – that he would have so many offspring that they would be like sand on the seashore, or like stars in the sky. And lastly God promised Abraham that he would bring blessing to all the world through Abraham’s family...
Fast forward 24 years from that original promise. Who can tell me what the big problem was? What part of God’s promise is still unfulfilled?
Abraham has been waiting 24 years for God to bring about that cornerstone promise – an heir, a child. Remember Abraham was 75 years old when God first made the promise to him. Sarah was 65. They were already past childbearing age, but Sarah had never been able to have children. It seemed like an impossible promise.
But we had a breakthrough in the story last week, didn’t we?
When Abraham was 99 and Sarah was 89, God spoke to them again and said: This time next year, you’ll have a baby.
And true to his word, that’s exactly what happened. A year later, we read in Genesis 21, Sarah gives birth to baby Isaac. His name means laughter. And Sarah comments on the joy that it is to finally have a baby after all those years of infertility.
“God has brought me laughter, and everyone who hears about this will laugh with me.” 7 And she added, “Who would have said to Abraham that Sarah would nurse children? Yet I have borne him a son in his old age.” (Genesis 21:6-7)
God’s promises were coming true, just as he had said they would, with a miracle baby born in impossible circumstances.
The Impossible Command
2
And that’s why Genesis 22 comes as such a shock. How could God ask Abraham do the impossible? How could he ask him to kill his own son?
1 Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” “Here I am,” he replied.
2 Then God said, “Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.” (Genesis 22:1-2)
I can’t imagine what was going through Abraham’s mind as he listened to the voice of God that he had heard so many times before. The voice that had promised him a son was now asking him to take that son and sacrifice him as a burnt offering...
It’s the impossible command, isn’t it? How can God ask Abraham to kill his own son?
We don’t get an insight into Abraham’s mind, and what he must have been thinking. Commentator Kent Hughes describes this passage as “artfully minimalist” – we’re left to fill in the blanks ourselves. But I imagine those words would have gone round and round in Abraham’s head all that night – your son, your only son, whom you love – Isaac.
It's the impossible command. How does Abraham respond?
3 Early the next morning Abraham got up and loaded his donkey. He took with him two of his servants and his son Isaac. When he had cut enough wood for the burnt offering, he set out for the place God had told him about. 4 On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place in the distance. 5 He said to his servants, “Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you.” (Genesis 22:3-5)
It's quite an extraordinary response, isn’t it? Abraham obeys God.
He packs his donkey and some firewood, and sets out with Isaac and two of his servants. They travel for three days until Mount Moriah is visible in the distance. I can only guess what the mood must have been like on the journey. Uncomfortable silences, I imagine.
But with the destination on the horizon, Abraham tells the servants to wait behind. And finally we get an insight into what Abraham was thinking (v5)
5 He said to his servants, “Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you.” (Genesis 22:5)
We will worship, and then we will come back to you.
I underlined this sentence when I was doing my preparation. Was Abraham telling a lie? I don’t think the servants knew what God had said to Abraham, and certainly Abraham isn’t going to say: wait here while I go and sacrifice my only son... So was
3
Abraham telling a lie? Or did the servants know, but not Isaac? That would make the whole thing conspiratorial.
Or perhaps Abraham was speaking the truth?
We will worship, and then we will come back to you.
Could Abraham somehow believe that both he and Isaac would return? Let’s find out what happened next.
6 Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on together, 7 Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, “Father?” (Genesis 22:6-7)
By the way, Isaac is probably 12 or 13 years old at this point. Back in v1 it says this story takes place some time later. Verse 6 shows us that Isaac is young and strong, probably the stronger of the two, as he easily carries the wood on his back up the mountain path.
Isaac is also old enough to be suspicious about what is going on.
7 Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, “Father?”
“Yes, my son?” Abraham replied.
“The fire and wood are here,” Isaac said, “but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?” (Genesis 22:7)
Isaac knows there is something missing. The animal to be sacrificed.
8 Abraham answered, “God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.” (Genesis 22:8)
PAUSE
The tension is palpable, isn’t it? Because we know who the lamb is. It’s Isaac, right? It seems like one of those half-truths we tell our kids to protect them, where we don’t tell them the whole story, just enough to make them feel ok. But older kids don’t usually fall for that...
The two of them went on together. And then the drama reaches its peak: (v9)
9 When they reached the place God had told him about, Abraham built an altar there and arranged the wood on it. He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. 10 Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son.
I have so many questions about how this played out. As one commentator conjectured, Isaac was probably strong enough to overpower his father, so it seems unlikely that Isaac was an unwilling victim. Perhaps he had understood the whole time what was going on. Or perhaps he understood for the first time when his father asked him to hold out his hands, and began to bind them.
4
And then I wonder about Abraham. He had possibly witnessed human sacrifices as part of the moon cult in the land of Ur where he grew up. And now it seemed that he was being called to the same, grotesque ‘worship’ by his new God.
When we read the rest of the Bible, God condemns child sacrifice in the strongest terms.1 It’s abhorrent to him. And so rightly we ask, how can God ask Abraham to do the same?
Abraham raises the knife to kill Isaac.
And that’s when the angel of the Lord calls out to him from heaven (v11):
11 “Abraham! Abraham!” [the angel called] “Here I am,” he replied.
12 “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”
13 Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son. (Genesis 22:11-13)
It’s such a relief, isn’t it? Isaac is saved, Abraham kills the ram instead. And God has provided, just like Abraham had said back in v8.
A Disgraceful Story Or A Deeper Meaning?
Is there anybody here who is hearing this story for the first time? I wonder what you think?
Like I said before, some people find this a very hard story to swallow.
Richard Dawkins, the famous atheist, calls this a disgraceful story in his book The God
Delusion.
“God ordered Abraham to make a burnt offering of his longed-for son. Abraham built an altar, put firewood upon it, and trussed Isaac up on top of the wood. His murdering knife was already in his hand when an angel dramatically intervened with the news of a last-minute change of plan: God was only joking after all, ‘tempting’ Abraham, and testing his faith. [...] this disgraceful story is an example simultaneously of child abuse, bullying in two asymmetrical power relationships, and the first recorded use of the Nuremberg defence: ‘I was only obeying orders.’ Yet the legend is one of the great foundational myths of all three monotheistic religions.”
Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
1 Leviticus 20:1-4; 2 Chronicles 28:3, 33:6; Isaiah 57:5; Ezekiel 23:37-39 5
A scathing review. For Dawkins, this story makes God look like a capricious bully, tempting Abraham in a cruel joke. And lots of people find this a persuasive argument.
I don’t think Dawkins is right.
Like I said before, I want to share some tools that help us when we encounter a part of Scripture that presents as challenging. Those tools will help us dig for the deeper meaning, and they’ll make us better readers of the Bible as well.
The first tool is a question to ask of any Bible text which is: what does it teach us about God?
The whole Bible is a disclosure of who God is, and how he is at work in the world. And as we read through the Bible, we get a very clear picture of what God is like – his character of goodness and mercy and forgiveness. God doesn’t tolerate injustice, or evil.
And so Richard Dawkins’ impression of God as a capricious bully doesn’t make sense of the God we meet in the Bible. Even if we think through the last few chapters in Genesis, God’s big plan is to bless Abraham, and to bring blessing to the entire world through Abraham’s offspring. It doesn’t make sense that God would torture Abraham along the way. That wouldn’t be a blessing to Abraham – it would make God evil. And if God is evil, then it’s hard to see how he would want to bring blessing to the entire world. It would be logically inconsistent.
So if the passage doesn’t teach us the Dawkinesque view of God, what does it teach us about God?
However hard we find his command to sacrifice Isaac, what we do learn is that God will provide. Abraham had learned to trust God during 25 years of waiting. Abraham had his ups and his downs during that time, but God had made good on his promises. God had provided for Abraham. So why shouldn’t God provide in this circumstance?
When we read the story through that lens, it makes a little more sense of v5. Abraham truly believed that both he and Isaac would return from Mount Moriah. Even if that meant that he had to go through with killing Isaac.
The writer to the Hebrews makes that exact argument in Hebrews 11:
17 By faith Abraham, when God tested him, offered Isaac as a sacrifice. He who had embraced the promises was about to sacrifice his one and only
son, 18 even though God had said to him, “It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned.” 19 Abraham reasoned that God could even raise the dead, and so in a manner of speaking he did receive Isaac back from death. (Hebrews 11:17-19)
It's right there in the last sentence, isn’t it?
Abraham reasoned that God could even raise the dead.
6
Abraham had already experienced a resurrection in his life – Isaac had been born in impossible circumstances, life had been born where hope was dead. Why couldn’t God do it again? After all, God had said to Abraham just a year earlier,
Is anything too hard for the Lord? (Genesis 18:14)
That’s a question for all of us when circumstances seem impossible. Is anything too hard for the Lord? The answer is no. There is nothing that is too hard for the Lord, there is nothing he cannot accomplish, if he so wills it to be.
And that brings me to our second tool for understanding difficult passages like this. Which is the question: what does it teach us about Jesus?
I said a minute ago that the whole Bible is a disclosure of who God is, and how he is at work in the world. As we read the whole Bible, we see that the story culminates in Jesus. And so when we read an Old Testament story like Abraham and Isaac, we read it through the lens of a story that ultimately points to Jesus.
And that’s where this story takes on a whole new depth of meaning.
Because many years later, another son would walk up the same mountain with wood on his back, willingly allowing himself to die as a sacrifice.
I’m talking about Jesus, of course. God’s only, beloved son. The wood that he carried was his cross.
Mount Moriah, where God had told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, it was the site where hundreds of years later, Jerusalem would be built, along with the temple which was the center of the Jewish sacrificial system. And for hundreds of years, it was through the sacrificial system in the temple that God provided forgiveness of sins.
But again, all those sacrificial lambs pointed ahead to the one true sacrifice. When John the Baptist first saw Jesus, he said:
“Look! The lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world.” (John 1:29)
And of course in Jesus, we see not just a metaphorical raising of the dead. After dying on the cross, Jesus spent three days in the tomb before being resurrected to new life. Which is coincidentally the same amount of time that Abraham had to wait, from the time of God’s command to the moment where God provided the ram, and his son was given back to him from certain death.
There are so many parallels.
God knows what it is like to sacrifice his only son, his beloved son. And he did that because he is the God who provides. Even when it seems impossible. He is the God who we can trust, even in the face of death.
And so this passage asks us what God asked Abraham: Do you trust me? Do you trust God, even to the point of death?
7
8
Watch at: https://youtu.be/Zejx1thFMi4 File Downloads: https://dq5pwpg1q8ru0.cloudfront.net/2022/05/11/20/23/15/97731977-598d-42c6-8c64-830345fb3094/03.13.22%20Sermon%20Transcript.pdf