Zone of Risk

Zone of Risk

By Joni Mosely & Spencer CharifSociety & Culture
Download on the App Store

Zone of Risk episodes

  • Separating Public School Restrooms Based on Biological Sex

    Professor Harold Krent of the Chicago Kent College of Law joins Robert to discuss a major 11th Circuit opinion. The court, sitting en banc, held that separating the use of male and female bathrooms in public schools based on a student’s biological sex does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title IX. The case is Drew Adams v. School Board of St. Johns County, Florida.

    Listen. Enjoy. Subscribe. Share.

    Send your questions, comments, and feedback to [email protected]. 

    *Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided on this podcast is not intended to be legal advice. You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice. If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer. The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers. This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only. Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited.

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    36 min
  • Police Anonymity

    Marsy's Law is a provision of the Florida Constitution that grants crime victims certain rights, among them is the right to "prevent the disclosure of information or records that could be used to locate or harass the victim or the victim’s family[.]" Art. I, §16(b)(5), Fla. Const. A police officer is victimized while on duty. Can she claim the protections of Marsy's Law?

    Daniela Abratt of Thomas & LoCicero joins Robert to debate the issue. Thomas & LoCicero represents the news media, which intervened in the case. The media argues that police officers are not covered by Marsy's Law. The First District Court of Appeal disagreed. The case is now before the Florida Supreme Court. Oral argument took place on Dec. 7, 2022.

    This podcast is supported by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.

    *Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  he information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice. You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice.  If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer. The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers. This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only. Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited. 

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    55 min
  • Sweeping Changes to Property Insurance Law

    Cristina Cambo breaks down the major changes to property insurance law in the wake of SB 2-A and explains what litigators and policy holders need to know.

    Cristina Cambo is a partner at the Bolin Law Group where she practices first- and third-party insurance coverage and defense. She recently testified before the Florida legislature on behalf of the Florida Defense Lawyers Association.

    You can find the summary of SB 2-A here.

    This podcast is supported by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.

    *Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  he information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice. You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice.  If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer. The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers. This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only. Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited. 

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    39 min
  • Thoughtful and Compassionate Prosecution

    State Attorney Harold F. Pryor joins Robert to discuss inequities in the criminal justice system, the challenges facing local prosecutors, and what it means to be a thoughtful and compassionate prosecutor.

    This podcast is supported by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.

    *Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice.  If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers.  This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited.  

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    50 min
  • PIP Earthquake

    Jennifer Opiola stops by to review three major PIP opinions from November, as well as an importance case from 2013 that plays a role in how the three opinions were decided.

    This podcast is supported by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.

    ·       United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lauderhill Med. Cent., LLC a/a/o /Robert White, (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

    ·       United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lauderhill Med. Cent., LLC a/a/o Amber Griffin, (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

    ·       United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Chironex Enter., Inc. a/a/o Eimly Echegaray, (Fla. 4th DCA 2022). 

     ·       Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Perez ex rel. Jeffrey Tedder, (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

    *Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice.  If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers.  This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited.  

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    37 min
  • November Rundown

    Lindsey and Robert cover civil and criminal opinions from November.

    This podcast is supported by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.

    Civil Opinions

    Enriquez v. Velazquez, 5th DCA (family law; paternity). 

    Wharran v. Morgan,  2d DCA (discovery; privacy rights).

    Harris v. Plapp, 1st DCA (proposals for settlement).

    Criminal Opinions (begin at 20:48)

    State v. Richmond, 1st DCA (medical records in criminal proceedings).

    Somers v. United States, FL. S. Ct. (ACCA).

    Edwards v. State, 1st DCA (stand-your-ground immunity).

    State v. Hall, 2d DCA (plea agreements).

    Martin v. State, 1st DCA (preservation; proffer).

     *Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice.  If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers.   

    This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited.  

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    44 min
  • What's Happening in Legal Ed

    Antony Page, Dean of FIU Law, joins Robert to discuss legal education, the U.S. News and World Report ranking, and affirmative action.

    This podcast is supported by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.

    Antony Page was named the third dean of the FIU College of Law in May 2018. Prior to joining FIU Law, Dean Page served as Vice Dean and Professor of Law at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.

    Dean Page earned his J.D. with distinction from Stanford Law School, where he was elected to Order of the Coif. Following law school, he clerked for the Honorable H.L. Hupp of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, and for the Honorable A.L. Alarcon of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. His international professional experience includes private practice in the London and Los Angeles offices of New York-based law firm Sullivan & Cromwell.


    Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice.  If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers.   

    This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited.  

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    46 min
  • Caselaw update and why Robert hates stand your ground

    Lindsey Lawton and I review civil and criminal opinions from September and October.

    This podcast is supported by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.

    Civil Opinions:
    ·        Iarussi v. Iarussi, 1st DCA (prejudgment interest on equitable distribution, and imputation of income for investments). 

    ·        White v. AutoZone, 3d DCA (employment discrimination). 

    ·        EIG Services, Inc. v. One Call Medical, Inc., 1st DCA (arbitration). 

    ·        Martin v. City of Tampa and Columbia Restaurant, 2d DCA (negligence; legal duty). 

    Criminal Opinions (beginning at 19:45)

    ·        State v. Green, 1st DCA (warrantless search of probationer’s home).

    ·        State v. Torres, 5th DCA (ongoing investigation exception; law enforcement jurisdiction).  

    ·        State v. Woodson, 5th DCA (stand-your-ground immunity). 

    Previous Stand-Your-Ground Opinions:

    ·        No evidentiary burden on defendant under stand your ground statute: Jefferson v. State (2d), Casanova v. State (3d), State v. Cassaday (4th), Rogers v. State (5th).

    ·        Defendant failed to pled facts sufficient to make a prima facie claim of self-defense: State v. Moore (3d), State v. Woodson (5th).

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    42 min
  • PIP, Insurance, and Standing - Oh My!

    It's time for PIP/insurance updates from October.  Join me and Jennifer Opiola for a breakdown of the following cases:

    • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Athans Chiropractic, Inc.
    • Air Quality Experts Corporation v. Family Security Insurance Company
    • Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. Tiffanie Hoffman

    Listen.  Enjoy.  Subscribe.  Share.

    This podcast is sponsored by Ascension Global Staffing & Executive Search.  Whether you are looking to bring on new talent or are trying to find the best fit for your career, Ascension can help.  Firms and companies that partner with Ascension can receive a 10% discount on Ascension’s services by emailing [email protected] (that’s info at ascension search dot com).   Team-up with elite talent. Elevate with Ascension.

    Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice.  If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers.   

    This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited.  

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    33 min
  • Capital Punishment and the Nikolas Cruz Case

    Last week, a jury in Broward County, Florida decided against the death penalty for Nikolas Cruz.  The decision was met with outrage by many and relief by some.  On this episode, Robert Dunham of the Death Penalty Information Center joins the podcast to discuss the facts and myths about the death penalty and to explain the Cruz verdict.

    Robert Dunham is the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.  He is a nationally recognized expert on the death penalty with more than 25 years of experience as a capital litigator.  The Death Penalty Information Center is a national non-profit organization serving the media and the public with analysis and information on issues concerning capital punishment.  Founded in 1990, the Center promotes informed discussion of the death penalty by preparing in-depth reports, conducting briefings for journalists, and serving as a resource to those working on this issue.

    Listen.  Enjoy.  Subscribe.  Share.

    Please send your questions and comments to [email protected]. 

    🔗 Connect with the Hosts:
    Joni Mosely – TheMoselyFirm.com
    Spencer Charif – CharifLaw.com

    1 hr 11 min

About Zone of Risk

From the publisher's feed

DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services. The information provided in this podcast is not intended to be legal advice. You should…

More shows like Zone of Risk

This American Life by This American Life

This American Life

90,560 Listeners

Pivot by New York Magazine

Pivot

9,664 Listeners