
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In 2012 Canadian judge Justice Binnie said David Bain was innocent on the balance of probabilities. Why? Hear what Binnie says and what Martin van Beynen makes of his arguments. And why does Binnie compare van Beynen to Inspector Javert, a fictitious fanatical police inspector?
Podcasts like this one take a lot of time and resources to create. To help cover some of that cost, you will hear some ads during this episode. For an ad-free experience subscribe to Stuff Extra on Apple Podcasts or at listen.stuff.co.nz/truecrime to get access to this and other Stuff True Crime podcasts ad-free, for about the price of a cup of coffee each month… and you’ll be helping us make more great podcasts, like this one.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
4.4
324324 ratings
In 2012 Canadian judge Justice Binnie said David Bain was innocent on the balance of probabilities. Why? Hear what Binnie says and what Martin van Beynen makes of his arguments. And why does Binnie compare van Beynen to Inspector Javert, a fictitious fanatical police inspector?
Podcasts like this one take a lot of time and resources to create. To help cover some of that cost, you will hear some ads during this episode. For an ad-free experience subscribe to Stuff Extra on Apple Podcasts or at listen.stuff.co.nz/truecrime to get access to this and other Stuff True Crime podcasts ad-free, for about the price of a cup of coffee each month… and you’ll be helping us make more great podcasts, like this one.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
38,503 Listeners
1,386 Listeners
2 Listeners
18 Listeners
41 Listeners
605 Listeners
11 Listeners
58 Listeners
2 Listeners
0 Listeners
7 Listeners
340 Listeners
2 Listeners
129 Listeners
0 Listeners
1 Listeners
1 Listeners
2 Listeners
63 Listeners
0 Listeners
5 Listeners
124 Listeners
176 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
80 Listeners
604 Listeners
41 Listeners
193 Listeners
333 Listeners
221 Listeners
12 Listeners
2 Listeners