
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff5
55 ratings
In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

91,297 Listeners

393 Listeners

236 Listeners

25 Listeners

77 Listeners

69 Listeners

87,868 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

14 Listeners

112 Listeners

458 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

116 Listeners

9,438 Listeners

13,710 Listeners