
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff5
55 ratings
In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

234 Listeners

207 Listeners

24 Listeners

112,360 Listeners

109 Listeners

430 Listeners

227 Listeners

24 Listeners

19 Listeners

108 Listeners

19,771 Listeners

1,603 Listeners

23 Listeners

10 Listeners

28 Listeners