
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff5
55 ratings
In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

202 Listeners

25 Listeners

197 Listeners

70 Listeners

781 Listeners

70 Listeners

92 Listeners

218 Listeners

415 Listeners

50 Listeners

26 Listeners

118 Listeners

45 Listeners

3 Listeners

9 Listeners