
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff5
55 ratings
In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

90,992 Listeners

407 Listeners

237 Listeners

24 Listeners

70 Listeners

78 Listeners

87,975 Listeners

113,259 Listeners

22 Listeners

109 Listeners

468 Listeners

16,410 Listeners

126 Listeners

9,346 Listeners

13,678 Listeners