
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff5
55 ratings
In this episode, we break down IRCC's practice of rejecting applications for incompleteness, often for minor technical issues. Effectively a form of stats manipulation, this practice creates a misleading picture of departmental efficiency while leaving applicants stranded, often forcing them to restart the process for trivial errors.
Cases discussed include Gennai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 29 and Goel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 275.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

90,994 Listeners

384 Listeners

223 Listeners

24 Listeners

70 Listeners

65 Listeners

87,529 Listeners

111,948 Listeners

18 Listeners

95 Listeners

419 Listeners

15,950 Listeners

112 Listeners

9,431 Listeners

13,636 Listeners