Him calling out my 1000 (hard earned, engaged, natural) followers, really pissed me off, and what I found in his follower list would ensure I never take Instagram seriously again. He had a backup account "FFFU backup" that had 2000
following and about a hundred followers. Ponder that for a second, because if you're been following along, you know exactly how FFFU got his stagnant following. He started his account, experienced slow growth, and created an artificial, dead fanbase by DMing 2000 people that he would follow them
on his second account if he got a follow on his main account from this particular person. Essentially, a classic follow-for-follow scheme to build an inorganic, inflated fanbase, but just a bit sneakier and done in a way that makes FFFU look like a big stud that has tons of followers without any effort. To think that guy was talking down to me since he "had more followers" and every single one of his followers was fake? Laughable, and enough for me to say, "Instagram isn't for me."After my lengthy detour (sorry, I really get going talking about Instagram BS), I'd like to center this conversation around how I ended up doing my podcast. I say all this to say that I learned the hard way that Instagram isn't a level playing field, and it wasn't worth getting frustrated over. Especially since- like I've hinted at, writing isn't ultimately what I want to do. This Instagram thing, while it bummed me out, pushed me to try my hand at video once again and like I said, learn the free video editor "Shotcut". Something Instagram taught me was that people don't have a very long attention span. Despite my lengthy writing, I eventually tried to accommodate short- bite sized stats in my graphic to get more people to engage since they just don't have a very long time looking at your post before scrolling onto the next, generally. Given this, I tried to make shorter YouTube videos as I learned shotcut. I would do the same level of research as I would writing on Instagram, but I'd leave some excess stuff out and the result was usually a pretty action packed video hovering around 10 minutes (sometimes 7 or 8 minutes, sometimes 12 or 13). These videos would do well, but being so bad at editing, I became frustrated with the time between videos I'd spend. Whereas I'd put out a ~1600 word article daily on Instagram, sometimes I'd go a day or two without posting a YouTube video because of the requisite editing and hurdles I'd have to overcome in real time as I was doing that. This frustration made me go through a similarly sizable change in my content as I went through on Instagram. As opposed to doing medium length videos with good production and editing, I decided to do streamlined content that's to the point and under 5 minutes. I could bang out more of them because they took less editing- if any, and I could post one a day just like I did on Instagram. So I set off on this, posting a short video a day and garnering less views than I was on my medium length videos, but enough to justify trying this strategy for a little more. Out of nowhere, though, one of these shorter videos I was doing about a marginal prospect named "Isaiah Mckoy" popped to the tune of 1000 views in the first week. Now granted it didn't go much further than that, but that was the most views I had ever gotten on a single video (and still have!) - it currently sits at 1.7 thousand views. I took note and have since then focused on this shorter form content on YouTube, since that's what the platform is more open to and will promote. How I got to this point of short videos, though, is through some serious introspection in terms of how I can most effectively produce short form content that is going to do well on YouTube.