Supreme Court Oral Arguments

[21-404] United States v. Washington


Listen Later

United States v. Washington

Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Apr 18, 2022.
Decided on Jun 21, 2022.

Petitioner: United States of America.
Respondent: State of Washington, et al..

Advocates:

  • Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Petitioner)
  • Tera M. Heintz (for the Respondents)
  • Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

    The Hanford site was a federal nuclear production site in Washington State that operated between 1944 and 1989, producing substantial amounts of radioactive and chemically hazardous waste. The U.S. Department of Energy now oversees cleanup of the site, which is largely conducted by private contractors and subcontractors.

    In 2018, Washington amended its state workers’ compensation laws specifically for these cleanup workers. The amended law creates a rebuttable presumption that certain conditions and cancers are occupational diseases.

    The federal government challenged the law as violating the principle of intergovernmental immunity. The district court granted summary judgment for Washington, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

    Question

    Does a Washington state workers’ compensation law that applies exclusively to certain federal workers in that state violate the principle of intergovernmental immunity?

    Conclusion

    Washington’s workers’ compensation law is unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause because it facially discriminates against the federal government and does not fall within the scope of the federal waiver of immunity. Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.

    The Supremacy Clause prohibits states from interfering with or controlling the operations of the federal government, also known as the intergovernmental immunity doctrine. Washington’s law explicitly treats federal workers differently from state and private workers, and imposes costs upon the federal government that state and private entities do not bear. As such, it is unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause. Contrary to Washington’s claims, no federal law “clearly and unambiguously” waives federal immunity from workers’ compensation laws.

    ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    Supreme Court Oral ArgumentsBy scotusstats.com

    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8

    4.8

    22 ratings


    More shows like Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    View all
    We the People by National Constitution Center

    We the People

    1,120 Listeners

    GLoP Culture by Ricochet

    GLoP Culture

    1,830 Listeners

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

    3,481 Listeners

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    647 Listeners

    Cases and Controversies by Bloomberg Law

    Cases and Controversies

    153 Listeners

    The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg by The Dispatch

    The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

    6,551 Listeners

    Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

    Strict Scrutiny

    5,686 Listeners

    Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

    Advisory Opinions

    3,806 Listeners

    The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

    The Dispatch Podcast

    3,234 Listeners

    The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

    The Ezra Klein Show

    15,543 Listeners

    Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

    Amarica's Constitution

    372 Listeners

    Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

    Divided Argument

    665 Listeners

    Honestly with Bari Weiss by The Free Press

    Honestly with Bari Weiss

    8,576 Listeners

    Shield of the Republic by The Bulwark

    Shield of the Republic

    472 Listeners

    Main Justice by MSNBC

    Main Justice

    7,039 Listeners