
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Brown v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 27, 2023.
Petitioner: Justin Rashaad Brown.
Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Justin Rashaad Brown was indicted in York County, Pennsylvania, for multiple counts, including being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Brown pleaded guilty to one charge of drug possession and distribution as well as the § 922(g) offense. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania sentenced him to concurrent terms of 180 months’ imprisonment due to prior convictions triggering the fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence prescribed in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). Brown appealed his enhanced sentence, arguing that his prior state marijuana convictions should not serve as predicates under the ACCA because those crimes are no longer a categorical match to their federal counterpart. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed.
Question
Does the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporate the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense?
By scotusstats.com4.8
2323 ratings
Brown v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 27, 2023.
Petitioner: Justin Rashaad Brown.
Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Justin Rashaad Brown was indicted in York County, Pennsylvania, for multiple counts, including being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Brown pleaded guilty to one charge of drug possession and distribution as well as the § 922(g) offense. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania sentenced him to concurrent terms of 180 months’ imprisonment due to prior convictions triggering the fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence prescribed in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). Brown appealed his enhanced sentence, arguing that his prior state marijuana convictions should not serve as predicates under the ACCA because those crimes are no longer a categorical match to their federal counterpart. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed.
Question
Does the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporate the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense?

3,536 Listeners

682 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

87,585 Listeners

112,751 Listeners

351 Listeners

7,164 Listeners

5,773 Listeners

3,884 Listeners

3,327 Listeners

16,038 Listeners

10,451 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,896 Listeners

7,044 Listeners