
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Devillier v. Texas
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 16, 2024.
Petitioner: Richard Devillier.
Respondent: State of Texas.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioners Devillier and others own property in Texas along Interstate Highway 10 (IH-10). The State of Texas, through the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), elevated IH-10 and installed a solid concrete median barrier, which acted as a “weir” to obstruct natural water flow and led to the flooding of the petitioners’ properties. Despite being aware of the potential for flooding, the State proceeded with the construction and even extended the barrier, causing extensive damage to the petitioners’ properties.
The petitioners sued the state, directly invoking the Taking Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which they argued applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court denied Texas’s motion to dismiss, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated, finding the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment does not provide a right of action for takings claims against the state.
Question
May a party sue a state directly under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment?
4.8
2222 ratings
Devillier v. Texas
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 16, 2024.
Petitioner: Richard Devillier.
Respondent: State of Texas.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioners Devillier and others own property in Texas along Interstate Highway 10 (IH-10). The State of Texas, through the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), elevated IH-10 and installed a solid concrete median barrier, which acted as a “weir” to obstruct natural water flow and led to the flooding of the petitioners’ properties. Despite being aware of the potential for flooding, the State proceeded with the construction and even extended the barrier, causing extensive damage to the petitioners’ properties.
The petitioners sued the state, directly invoking the Taking Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which they argued applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court denied Texas’s motion to dismiss, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated, finding the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment does not provide a right of action for takings claims against the state.
Question
May a party sue a state directly under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment?
1,107 Listeners
1,801 Listeners
3,482 Listeners
652 Listeners
153 Listeners
6,492 Listeners
5,674 Listeners
3,790 Listeners
3,218 Listeners
15,470 Listeners
372 Listeners
669 Listeners
8,606 Listeners
463 Listeners
7,031 Listeners