Supreme Court Oral Arguments

[23-51] Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC


Listen Later

Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Feb 20, 2024.

Petitioner: Neal Bissonnette, et al.
Respondent: LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, et al.

Advocates:

  • Jennifer D. Bennett (for the Petitioners)
  • Traci L. Lovitt (for the Respondents)
  • Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

    Flowers Foods, Inc. is a holding company that owns subsidiaries responsible for producing and distributing baked goods like breads, buns, rolls, and snack cakes. Two of the independent distributors for Flowers in Connecticut are Neal Bissonnette and Tyler Wojnarowski. Both entered into Distributor Agreements with Flowers in 2017 and 2018, respectively. According to these agreements, they pick up baked goods from local warehouses and distribute them to stores and restaurants, earning the difference between the acquisition and selling prices. They are also responsible for sales promotion, stock management, and other operational tasks. While they can sell non-competitive products, they primarily work full-time for Flowers.

    The Distributor Agreement includes an appended Arbitration Agreement, which states that any disputes must be submitted to binding arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, except for certain specified issues. Pursuant to that arbitration agreement, the district court compelled arbitration. Bissonnette and Wojnarowski claimed that they are not subject to the FAA because they are “transportation workers” within the meaning of Section 1 of the FAA, which excludes contracts with “seamen, railroad employees, [and] any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision ordering arbitration and dismissing Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Defendant for unpaid or withheld wages, unpaid overtime wages, and unjust enrichment, concluding that Bissonnette and Wojnarowski did not qualify as transportation workers because they were not employed by a company in the transportation industry.

    Question

    To be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, must a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation also be employed by a company in the transportation industry?

    ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    Supreme Court Oral ArgumentsBy scotusstats.com

    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8

    4.8

    22 ratings


    More shows like Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    View all
    We the People by National Constitution Center

    We the People

    1,107 Listeners

    GLoP Culture by Ricochet

    GLoP Culture

    1,801 Listeners

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

    3,482 Listeners

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    652 Listeners

    Cases and Controversies by Bloomberg Law

    Cases and Controversies

    153 Listeners

    The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg by The Dispatch

    The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

    6,492 Listeners

    Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

    Strict Scrutiny

    5,674 Listeners

    Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

    Advisory Opinions

    3,790 Listeners

    The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

    The Dispatch Podcast

    3,218 Listeners

    The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

    The Ezra Klein Show

    15,470 Listeners

    Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

    Amarica's Constitution

    372 Listeners

    Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

    Divided Argument

    669 Listeners

    Honestly with Bari Weiss by The Free Press

    Honestly with Bari Weiss

    8,606 Listeners

    Shield of the Republic by The Bulwark

    Shield of the Republic

    463 Listeners

    Main Justice by MSNBC

    Main Justice

    7,031 Listeners