Supreme Court Oral Arguments

[23-909] Kousisis v. United States


Listen Later

Kousisis v. United States

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Dec 9, 2024.

Petitioner: Stamatios Kousisis.
Respondent: United States of America.

Advocates:

  • Jeffrey L. Fisher (for the Petitioners)
  • Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent)
  • Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

    The U.S. Department of Transportation provides funds to state agencies for transportation projects, requiring recipients to set participation goals for disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs). Kousisis, Frangos, and their companies, Alpha and Liberty Maintenance, were awarded contracts for two Philadelphia projects with DBE requirements. They committed to working with Markias, Inc., a certified DBE, claiming they would obtain millions in paint supplies from the company.

    However, the defendants submitted false documentation about Markias’s role in the projects. Instead of Markias supplying products or performing a commercially useful function as required, it served merely as a pass-through. The defendants arranged for actual suppliers to send invoices to Markias, which then issued its own invoices with a 2.25% fee added. This scheme allowed the defendants to appear compliant with DBE requirements, a condition for receiving payments and avoiding penalties. The jury convicted Kousisis and Alpha of false statements, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and wire fraud.

    The district court calculated the loss based on the defendants’ “ill-gotten profits,” determining that this was an appropriate measure of loss when the actual loss to the government was not measurable at the time of sentencing. This calculation led to a 20-point sentencing enhancement corresponding to a loss between $9.5 million and $25 million.

    Kousisis and Alpha appealed their convictions and the calculation of the loss for sentencing purposes. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the convictions but vacated the loss calculation.

    Question

    Can deception to induce a commercial exchange constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme?

    ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    Supreme Court Oral ArgumentsBy scotusstats.com

    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8

    4.8

    23 ratings


    More shows like Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    View all
    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

    3,536 Listeners

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    682 Listeners

    We the People by National Constitution Center

    We the People

    1,119 Listeners

    Pod Save America by Crooked Media

    Pod Save America

    87,585 Listeners

    The Daily by The New York Times

    The Daily

    112,751 Listeners

    Politically Georgia by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Politically Georgia

    351 Listeners

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat by New York Times Opinion

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

    7,164 Listeners

    Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

    Strict Scrutiny

    5,773 Listeners

    Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

    Advisory Opinions

    3,884 Listeners

    The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

    The Dispatch Podcast

    3,327 Listeners

    The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

    The Ezra Klein Show

    16,038 Listeners

    #SistersInLaw by Politicon

    #SistersInLaw

    10,451 Listeners

    Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

    Divided Argument

    737 Listeners

    The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart by Comedy Central

    The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart

    10,896 Listeners

    Main Justice by MS NOW, Andrew Weissmann, Mary McCord

    Main Justice

    7,044 Listeners