
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 28, 2025.
Petitioner: A.J.T.
Respondent: Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
A.J.T., a student with epilepsy, experiences seizures so severe in the morning that she cannot attend school until noon. Her parents repeatedly requested evening instruction from Osseo Area Schools to give her a school day length more comparable to her peers. Despite the District providing some accommodations, including one-on-one instruction, a slightly extended school day, and summer home instruction sessions, they denied the requests for evening instruction. The District’s Director of Student Services, responsible for Section 504 compliance, was unaware of the parents’ complaints and did not know that District policies allowed at-home schooling as an accommodation. A.J.T., through her parents, sued the District for disability discrimination under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the District, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed.
Question
Do the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Rehabilitation Act of 1973 require children with disabilities to satisfy a “bad faith or gross misjudgment” standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education?
4.8
2222 ratings
A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 28, 2025.
Petitioner: A.J.T.
Respondent: Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
A.J.T., a student with epilepsy, experiences seizures so severe in the morning that she cannot attend school until noon. Her parents repeatedly requested evening instruction from Osseo Area Schools to give her a school day length more comparable to her peers. Despite the District providing some accommodations, including one-on-one instruction, a slightly extended school day, and summer home instruction sessions, they denied the requests for evening instruction. The District’s Director of Student Services, responsible for Section 504 compliance, was unaware of the parents’ complaints and did not know that District policies allowed at-home schooling as an accommodation. A.J.T., through her parents, sued the District for disability discrimination under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the District, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed.
Question
Do the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Rehabilitation Act of 1973 require children with disabilities to satisfy a “bad faith or gross misjudgment” standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education?
1,107 Listeners
1,782 Listeners
3,529 Listeners
666 Listeners
155 Listeners
6,493 Listeners
5,697 Listeners
3,801 Listeners
3,184 Listeners
15,335 Listeners
383 Listeners
666 Listeners
8,721 Listeners
456 Listeners
7,130 Listeners