
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 29, 2025.
Petitioner: Luke Davis.
Respondent: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Julian Vargas, who is blind, encountered inaccessible check-in kiosks at LabCorp facilities. Vargas attempted to use these kiosks but was unable due to their lack of accessibility for visually impaired individuals. As a result, he had to wait for assistance from a staff member, which delayed his check-in and denied him equal access to services such as maintaining his spot in the queue or updating personal information privately. Vargas claimed that this lack of accessibility infringed on his rights under disability laws, leading to the lawsuit. The district court certified two classes: a California class for Unruh Civil Rights Act claims and a nationwide class for claims under the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Affordable Care Act. LabCorp appealed the class certification, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision.
Question
May a federal court certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack any Article III injury?
By scotusstats.com4.8
2323 ratings
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 29, 2025.
Petitioner: Luke Davis.
Respondent: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Julian Vargas, who is blind, encountered inaccessible check-in kiosks at LabCorp facilities. Vargas attempted to use these kiosks but was unable due to their lack of accessibility for visually impaired individuals. As a result, he had to wait for assistance from a staff member, which delayed his check-in and denied him equal access to services such as maintaining his spot in the queue or updating personal information privately. Vargas claimed that this lack of accessibility infringed on his rights under disability laws, leading to the lawsuit. The district court certified two classes: a California class for Unruh Civil Rights Act claims and a nationwide class for claims under the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Affordable Care Act. LabCorp appealed the class certification, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision.
Question
May a federal court certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack any Article III injury?

3,528 Listeners

685 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

87,588 Listeners

112,734 Listeners

352 Listeners

7,165 Listeners

5,774 Listeners

3,883 Listeners

3,322 Listeners

16,053 Listeners

10,428 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,931 Listeners

7,052 Listeners