
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Berk v. Choy
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 6, 2025.
Petitioner: Harold R. Berk.
Respondent: Wilson C. Choy.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Harold R. Berk injured his ankle and allegedly received negligent medical care from three healthcare providers: Dr. Wilson C. Choy, Beebe Medical Center, Inc., and Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Middletown, LLC. Believing he suffered harm due to their malpractice, Berk filed a lawsuit against them under Delaware law. Like many states, Delaware requires plaintiffs in medical negligence cases to submit an affidavit of merit (AOM)—a statement from a qualified expert certifying that the lawsuit has a reasonable basis—either with the complaint or within a short time after filing.
Berk failed to submit an AOM with his complaint and did not request an extension before the deadline passed. Because the Delaware statute treats the AOM requirement as mandatory, the district court dismissed his case. Berk appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the Delaware AOM statute is substantive and therefore must be enforced by a federal court sitting in diversity.
Question
Must a Delaware law providing that a complaint must be dismissed unless it is accompanied by an expert affidavit be enforced by a federal court sitting in diversity?
By scotusstats.com4.8
2323 ratings
Berk v. Choy
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 6, 2025.
Petitioner: Harold R. Berk.
Respondent: Wilson C. Choy.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Harold R. Berk injured his ankle and allegedly received negligent medical care from three healthcare providers: Dr. Wilson C. Choy, Beebe Medical Center, Inc., and Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Middletown, LLC. Believing he suffered harm due to their malpractice, Berk filed a lawsuit against them under Delaware law. Like many states, Delaware requires plaintiffs in medical negligence cases to submit an affidavit of merit (AOM)—a statement from a qualified expert certifying that the lawsuit has a reasonable basis—either with the complaint or within a short time after filing.
Berk failed to submit an AOM with his complaint and did not request an extension before the deadline passed. Because the Delaware statute treats the AOM requirement as mandatory, the district court dismissed his case. Berk appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the Delaware AOM statute is substantive and therefore must be enforced by a federal court sitting in diversity.
Question
Must a Delaware law providing that a complaint must be dismissed unless it is accompanied by an expert affidavit be enforced by a federal court sitting in diversity?

3,528 Listeners

685 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

87,588 Listeners

112,734 Listeners

352 Listeners

7,165 Listeners

5,774 Listeners

3,883 Listeners

3,322 Listeners

16,053 Listeners

10,428 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,931 Listeners

7,052 Listeners