Supreme Court Oral Arguments

[24-5774] Barrett v. United States


Listen Later

Barrett v. United States

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Oct 7, 2025.

Petitioner: Dwayne Barrett.
Respondent: United States of America.

Advocates:

  • Matthew B. Larsen (for the Petitioner)
  • Aimee W. Brown (for the Respondent, in support of the Petitioner)
  • Charles L. McCloud (Court-appointed amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below)
  • Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

    Between August 2011 and January 2012, Dwayne Barrett and several co-conspirators carried out a string of armed robberies in New York, often using guns, knives, and threats of violence. On December 12, 2011, Barrett and two associates followed a minivan carrying the proceeds from a sale of untaxed cigarettes. While Barrett waited in the car, his accomplices held two men at gunpoint and stole the vehicle, which also contained $10,000 and a third victim, Gamar Dafalla. As he tried to discard some of the money during the getaway, Dafalla was fatally shot by one of the robbers. Later that day, Barrett took part in another robbery, threatening a victim’s life. He also helped dispose of the murder weapon and clean their vehicle with latex gloves and cleaning fluid to eliminate evidence.

    Barrett was indicted on multiple counts, including conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, two substantive counts of Hobbs Act robbery (one involving Dafalla’s murder), and separate firearms offenses, including a murder charge under 18 U.S.C. § 924(j). He was convicted in 2014 and originally sentenced to 90 years in prison. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated one firearms conviction under the Supreme Court’s then-new decision in United States v. Davis. Barrett was resentenced to 50 years in 2021. After further appellate proceedings, the Second Circuit affirmed most of his convictions and sentence but vacated and remanded for resentencing in light of the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Lora v. United States, which held that § 924(j) does not require consecutive sentencing under § 924(c).

    Question

    Does the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment permit two sentences for an act that violates 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and (j)?

    ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    Supreme Court Oral ArgumentsBy scotusstats.com

    • 4.9
    • 4.9
    • 4.9
    • 4.9
    • 4.9

    4.9

    37 ratings


    More shows like Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    View all
    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

    3,550 Listeners

    Bloomberg Law by Bloomberg

    Bloomberg Law

    383 Listeners

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    670 Listeners

    We the People by National Constitution Center

    We the People

    1,115 Listeners

    Conversations with Bill Kristol by Bill Kristol

    Conversations with Bill Kristol

    2,037 Listeners

    The Lawfare Podcast by The Lawfare Institute

    The Lawfare Podcast

    6,309 Listeners

    Stay Tuned with Preet by Preet Bharara

    Stay Tuned with Preet

    32,379 Listeners

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat by New York Times Opinion

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

    7,251 Listeners

    Strict Scrutiny by Strict Scrutiny

    Strict Scrutiny

    5,863 Listeners

    Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

    Advisory Opinions

    3,955 Listeners

    The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

    The Dispatch Podcast

    3,365 Listeners

    Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

    Amarica's Constitution

    396 Listeners

    Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

    Divided Argument

    745 Listeners

    Shield of the Republic by The Bulwark

    Shield of the Republic

    500 Listeners

    Central Air by Josh Barro, Megan McArdle & Ben Dreyfuss

    Central Air

    459 Listeners