Supreme Court Oral Arguments

[24-5774] Barrett v. United States


Listen Later

Barrett v. United States

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Oct 7, 2025.

Petitioner: Dwayne Barrett.
Respondent: United States of America.

Advocates:

  • Matthew B. Larsen (for the Petitioner)
  • Aimee W. Brown (for the Respondent, in support of the Petitioner)
  • Charles L. McCloud (Court-appointed amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below)
  • Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

    Between August 2011 and January 2012, Dwayne Barrett and several co-conspirators carried out a string of armed robberies in New York, often using guns, knives, and threats of violence. On December 12, 2011, Barrett and two associates followed a minivan carrying the proceeds from a sale of untaxed cigarettes. While Barrett waited in the car, his accomplices held two men at gunpoint and stole the vehicle, which also contained $10,000 and a third victim, Gamar Dafalla. As he tried to discard some of the money during the getaway, Dafalla was fatally shot by one of the robbers. Later that day, Barrett took part in another robbery, threatening a victim’s life. He also helped dispose of the murder weapon and clean their vehicle with latex gloves and cleaning fluid to eliminate evidence.

    Barrett was indicted on multiple counts, including conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, two substantive counts of Hobbs Act robbery (one involving Dafalla’s murder), and separate firearms offenses, including a murder charge under 18 U.S.C. § 924(j). He was convicted in 2014 and originally sentenced to 90 years in prison. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated one firearms conviction under the Supreme Court’s then-new decision in United States v. Davis. Barrett was resentenced to 50 years in 2021. After further appellate proceedings, the Second Circuit affirmed most of his convictions and sentence but vacated and remanded for resentencing in light of the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Lora v. United States, which held that § 924(j) does not require consecutive sentencing under § 924(c).

    Question

    Does the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment permit two sentences for an act that violates 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and (j)?

    ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    Supreme Court Oral ArgumentsBy scotusstats.com

    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8
    • 4.8

    4.8

    23 ratings


    More shows like Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    View all
    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

    3,485 Listeners

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    672 Listeners

    We the People by National Constitution Center

    We the People

    1,116 Listeners

    Pod Save America by Crooked Media

    Pod Save America

    87,203 Listeners

    The Daily by The New York Times

    The Daily

    112,362 Listeners

    Politically Georgia by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Politically Georgia

    339 Listeners

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat by New York Times Opinion

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

    7,042 Listeners

    Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

    Strict Scrutiny

    5,758 Listeners

    Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

    Advisory Opinions

    3,863 Listeners

    The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

    The Dispatch Podcast

    3,299 Listeners

    The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

    The Ezra Klein Show

    16,145 Listeners

    #SistersInLaw by Politicon

    #SistersInLaw

    10,448 Listeners

    Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

    Divided Argument

    737 Listeners

    The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart by Comedy Central

    The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart

    10,830 Listeners

    Main Justice by MSNBC

    Main Justice

    7,038 Listeners